Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Yvonne
|
Report
|
14 Mar 2019 18:31 |
Yes, it gives father as James Brock, Gamekeeper, and one of the witnesses is Ann Isabella Brock.. Residence at time of marriage is shown as Rufford.
Guess we can take this as a definite eh?
Thanks.
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
13 Mar 2019 23:24 |
And does it show that she is the right person - ie - James Brock's daughter?
|
|
Yvonne
|
Report
|
13 Mar 2019 21:48 |
Just for the record, I got the marriage certificate for 'Benjamina' - not easy to read but it looks like 'Beennay Brock' on the certificate. She married Charles Hamblin on 14 Feb 1849.
|
|
Yvonne
|
Report
|
6 Feb 2019 23:08 |
Duh … why didn't I think of that. I guess this family is just doing my head in.
Thanks, will do.
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
6 Feb 2019 23:00 |
Personally, I think it's a definite!
But a copy of the marriage cert would confirm it - or not.
|
|
Yvonne
|
Report
|
6 Feb 2019 22:03 |
Thanks AG … this family is driving me nuts!
It looks like you're onto something there. The Bunny/Benjamina/Benny in the various census have him/her born in Scotland which is where the birth was. It's not a 'for sure' but it does look like a 'more than likely'. What a mess … great job, thanks.
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
6 Feb 2019 19:41 |
In 1881 and 1891 she's called Benjamina:
Benjamina Hamblin in the 1891 England Census Name: Benjamina Hamblin Gender: Female Age: 64 Relationship: Wife Birth Year: 1827 Spouse: Charles Hamblin Child: Clara Hamblin Charles Hamblin Birth Place: Scotland Civil Parish: Great Badminton Residence Place: Great Badminton, Great Badminton, Gloucestershire, England Sub registration district: Hawkesbury ED, Institution or Vessel: 7 Neighbors: Piece: 1996 Folio: 66 Household Members: Name Age Charles Hamblin 66 Benjamina Hamblin 64 Clara Hamblin 24 Charles Hamblin 22 Mabel Fuller 14
But in all the other censuses it's shortened to Benny or Benney:
Benney Hamblen in the 1901 England Census Name: Benney Hamblen Age: 75 Estimated birth year: abt 1826 Relation to Head: Head Gender: Female Birth Place: Scotland Civil Parish: Tetbury Upton Ecclesiastical parish: Tetbury St Mary County/Island: Gloucestershire Country: England Registration district: Tetbury Sub-registration district: Tetbury ED, institution, or vessel: 6 Neighbors: Piece: 2445 Folio: 30 Page Number: 9 Household schedule number: 55 Household Members: Name Age Benney Hamblen 75 Charles Hamblen 32
And in 1871 on Ancestry, it's mistranscribed as Bumery !
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
6 Feb 2019 19:39 |
Benjamin Hamblin of North Tetbury, Gloucestershire, >>>>> WIDOW, <<<<< died 24 October 1906. Probate London 14 December to Robert Hamblin, gentleman. Effects £698 11s 10d.
Benjamin Hamblin in the England & Wales, National Probate Calendar (Index of Wills and Administrations), 1858-1966, 1973-1995 Name: Benjamin Hamblin Death Date: 24 Oct 1906 Death Place: Gloucestershire, England Probate Date: 14 Dec 1906 Registry: London, England
Benjamin Hamblin in the Gloucestershire, England, Church of England Burials, 1813-1988 Name: Benjamin Hamblin (widow of Charles Hamblin) <<<<<<<<<< Age: 81 Birth Year: abt 1825 Burial Date: 29 Oct 1906 Burial Place: Tetbury, St Mary, Gloucestershire, England Parish as it Appears: Tetbury
Benjamin Hamblin in the England & Wales, Civil Registration Death Index, 1837-1915 Name: Benjamin Hamblin Estimated birth year: abt 1825 Registration Year: 1906 Registration Quarter: Oct-Nov-Dec Age at Death: 81 Registration district: Tetbury Inferred County: Gloucestershire Volume: 6a Page: 249
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
6 Feb 2019 19:30 |
Benjaman (sic) is listed as male on the 1841 census (already posted on page 2)
The mistake could be in either the baptism record or the census! Hard to know.
I've heard of Benjamina as a girl's name.
Benjaman/Banjamin isn't with his/her parents in 1851, 1861, or 1871.
As some of the other siblings seem to have married in Southwell reg district, I'm wondering about this one:
Marriages Mar 1849 (>99%) Brock Bunney Southwell 15 835 ; Hamblin Charles Southwell 15 835
Benny Hamblin in the 1861 England Census Name: Benny Hamblin Age: 35 Estimated birth year: 1826 Relation: Wife Spouse's name: Charles Hamblin Where born: Scotland <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Civil Parish: Ordsall County/Island: Nottinghamshire Country: England Registration district: East Retford Sub-registration district: East Retford ED, institution, or vessel: 16 Neighbors: Household schedule number: 37 Piece: 2416 Folio: 111 Page Number: 7 Household Members: Name Age Charles Hamblin 36 Benny Hamblin 35 Fanny Hamblin 12 Isabella Hamblin 10 Ann Hamblin 8 Robert Hamblin 6 Harriett Hamblin 4 Lucy Hamblin 2 Eliza Ann Hamblin 9/12
|
|
Yvonne
|
Report
|
6 Feb 2019 17:45 |
Here's another one for you. I've just looked at the birth of another sibling to Mary on ScotlandsPeople, this one for 'Benjamin' and I quote:
Banjamin daughter to James Brock and Isabella Embelton his wife born at High Belchristen?? 2 Dec 1825 and baptised 23 January 1826.
Have you ever heard of Banjamin being a girl's name or is this yet another item wrongly recorded?
|
|
Yvonne
|
Report
|
6 Feb 2019 17:24 |
I tend to agree with you AQ and AG that it's Mary's entry that is wrongly recorded. I think we can safely assume she was born in 1821 or 1822. Phew, glad it wasn't a miracle birth!
Thanks.
|
|
AustinQ
|
Report
|
6 Feb 2019 13:01 |
Good work AG- I suspected as much. More than a year between Mary's christening and Hanah's birth- so not a miracle birth!
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
6 Feb 2019 12:35 |
It has definitely been written wrongly in the parish record.
It was bugging me, so I had a look myself .
The christening date was 16 March 1823, so the birth must have been Dec 1822 (or even some earlier year - going by all the census records, I would guess 1821).
It's a mistake by whoever wrote the record.
We'll never know her actual DOB for sure.
|
|
AustinQ
|
Report
|
6 Feb 2019 08:15 |
Does it give a date for Mary's Christening? It would be unusual for the date of entry to be the same as the birth date.
As you say, as birth dates they are not possible. I still suspect that it is Mary's entry that is recorded wrongly.
|
|
Yvonne
|
Report
|
5 Feb 2019 23:24 |
Interesting … I splashed out and bought credits on ScotlandsPeople. The entry for Mary Brock says:
Mary daughter to James Brock and Isabella Embleton his wife born at High Belchristen?? 22 Dec 1823.
It turns out that Hanah and Ann Isabella are twins and the entry for them is dated 3 May 1824 and says:
Hanah and Anna Isabella twin daughters to James and Isabella Embleton his wife born at High Belchristen 21 March and certified this day.
This must be the shortest full term pregnancy ever!!!
I honestly don't know where to go from here.
|
|
AustinQ
|
Report
|
5 Feb 2019 11:09 |
Looking at the census info, I think it's likely that Mary was born before Dec 1823:
1851: Name: Mary Herod Age: 28 Estimated birth year: abt 1823 Relation: Head Gender: Female Where born: Scotland Civil Parish: Rufford ------------------------
1861: Name: Mary Herod Age: 39 Estimated birth year: 1822 Relation: Wife Spouse's name: Samuel Herod Gender: Female Where born: Scotland Civil Parish: Rufford -------------------
1871: Name: Mary Herod Age: 51 Estimated birth year: abt 1820 Relation: Wife Spouse's name: Samuel Herod Gender: Female Where born: Scotland Civil Parish: Rufford -----------------------------
1881: Name: Mary Herrod [Mary Herod] Age: 60 Estimated birth year: abt 1821 Relationship to Head: Wife Spouse: Samuel Herrod Gender: Female Where born: Scotland Civil Parish: Rufford ------------------------
1891: Name: Mary Herod Gender: Female Age: 70 Relationship: Wife Birth Year: 1821 Spouse: Samuel Herod Child: Mary Herod Birth Place: Ayrshire, Scotland Civil Parish: Rufford -------------------
1901: Name: Mary Herod Age: 79 Estimated birth year: abt 1822 Relation to Head: Wife Gender: Female Spouse: Samuel Herod Birth Place: Scotland Civil Parish: Rufford ------------------------
Death: Name: Mary Herod Estimated birth year: abt 1821 Registration Year: 1911 Registration Quarter: Jan-Feb-Mar Age at Death: 90 Registration district: Southwell Inferred County: Nottinghamshire Volume: 7b Page: 263
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
5 Feb 2019 09:20 |
Perhaps one date is a mistranscription.
As AQ says - best to look at the original.
Bear in mind that these are church records, and so some dates transcribed may be christening dates rather than actual birth dates, even if the transcription says birth date.
|
|
AustinQ
|
Report
|
5 Feb 2019 08:55 |
It might wise to check to original images on Scotlandspeople:
BROCK ANN ISOBELLA Parents: JAMES BROCK/ISABELLA EMBLETON date: 21/03/1824 Kirkoswald
BROCK HANAH Parents: JAMES BROCK/ISABELLA EMBLETON Date: 21/03/1824 Kirkoswald
BROCK MARY Parents: JAMES BROCK/ISABELLE EMBLETON Date: 22/12/1823 Kirkoswald ----------------------------
Name: Frederick Edward Brock Gender: Male Birth Date: 15 Sep 1818 Baptism Date: 6 Jun 1819 Baptism Place: Ancroft,Northumberland,England Father: James Brock Mother: Isabella FHL Film Number: 252562
|
|
Yvonne
|
Report
|
4 Feb 2019 23:57 |
I'm adding to this post because I don't want to have to go through it all again.
I've been looking at James Brock snr., married to Isabella Embleton and their children. The first child I found was Mary Brock and on familysearch the birth was given as 22 Dec 1823 in Kirkoswald, Ayrshire, parents James Brock and Isabella Embleton. The second child was Ann Isabella and her date of birth was given as 21 Mar 1824.
How can this be?
|
|
Yvonne
|
Report
|
30 Jan 2019 18:43 |
Thanks AG ... he was definitely quite a lad.
|