Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Scott family puzzle
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Ronald | Report | 23 Nov 2018 19:00 |
Good afternoon, |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 23 Nov 2018 19:16 |
3 of those children were born before Henry's marriage to Martha Charlotte Forbes. Could he have been previously married to a Wilkinson? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 23 Nov 2018 19:21 |
?????? Names switched round??? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
greyghost | Report | 23 Nov 2018 19:23 |
Is this the family in 1881 ? |
|||
|
Ronald | Report | 23 Nov 2018 19:23 |
Hi MargaretM, yes that's possible, but Joseph was born in 1881, 6 years after the marriage and the mother's maiden name was still Wilkinson. Also, Henry is shown as a bachelor, although I know people often lied about things. |
|||
|
Ronald | Report | 23 Nov 2018 19:29 |
Hi +++DetEcTive+++, I understand what you're saying but the address is identical in the birth and marriage certificates, despite mmn being different. |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 23 Nov 2018 19:30 |
Has anyone managed to find a birth registration for Charlotte Martha under either Wilkinson OR Forbes?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
greyghost | Report | 23 Nov 2018 19:33 |
This will be the Charlotte aged 2 on 1881 census |
|||
|
Ronald | Report | 23 Nov 2018 19:35 |
Yes, Greyghost, it is. |
|||
|
Ronald | Report | 23 Nov 2018 19:36 |
Hi SylviaInCanada, yes, it's the reference I put in my original post |
|||
|
greyghost | Report | 23 Nov 2018 19:41 |
Only Martha Charlotte I've found, so almost 10 years older than 1881 suggests, but born Surrey as per census, but not Bermondsey |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 23 Nov 2018 19:41 |
Ronald ............ I meant the MOTHER Martha Charlotte Forbes or Wilkinson |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ronald | Report | 23 Nov 2018 19:42 |
Now that's interesting Greyghost. I obtained Martha Charlotte mmn from the GRO site. I think the Charlotte in the 1881 is a different person, as she was born in 1879. Martha was 1875. However, the Forbes reference is intriguing. |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 23 Nov 2018 19:43 |
The usual reason for a couple not to marry until after several children are born include they don't want to, but usually back in those days it meant that one partner was already married. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
greyghost | Report | 23 Nov 2018 19:45 |
More Scott/Forbes births - after the marriage |
|||
|
greyghost | Report | 23 Nov 2018 20:00 |
the Scott/Wilkinson births if all to the same couple go on pre and post the marriage of Henry and Martha in 1875 |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 23 Nov 2018 20:01 |
Here's another version of the baptism found by TEC ,,,,,, only she was born much earlier |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ronald | Report | 23 Nov 2018 20:01 |
Sorry SylviaInCanada, misinterpreted your question. |
|||
|
greyghost | Report | 23 Nov 2018 20:10 |
Martha widowed by 1891, - so no idea of age for Henry as he wasn't shown on 1881 census either to look for him earlier |
|||
|
greyghost | Report | 23 Nov 2018 20:14 |
unless one of these is him - so born c 1830 / 1825 / 1825 which would make him older than Martha's declared age on census. But he could have died anywhere or Martha just says she's widowed |