Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Florence Jacques Robson
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
AustinQ | Report | 13 Apr 2018 12:39 |
I have scanned my photos (front and back)- I keep them on a stick. Many of them were getting quite fragile and unless you store them correctly they are likely to deteriorate more over time. |
|||
|
AKayeLibrarian | Report | 13 Apr 2018 14:17 |
Ooh, thanks, I had no idea that World War I records gad been destroyed. |
|||
|
AKayeLibrarian | Report | 13 Apr 2018 14:39 |
The postcards are wonderful. Yes they have dates, names and addresses so it’s easy to see who they’re from. He sends postcards of buildings he’s stationed near and tells her whether they have been destroyed or damaged. I love them. |
|||
|
AKayeLibrarian | Report | 13 Apr 2018 19:43 |
Austin Q - coming back to the text (pasted below) which you found, I wondered whether Elizabeth's mother might be the mother of Tom Daley? I think his mother is Bridget Daley, born Bridget Carroll in Glasgow in 1869. This would mean she would have been around 15 when she had Elizabeth to Luke Jacques, if this was true. However, I can't seem to link Bridget with Elizabeth either. Can't seem to find Bridget in the 1891 or 1901 censuses and by 1911 Elizabeth certainly isn't living with her. |
|||
|
AKayeLibrarian | Report | 13 Apr 2018 19:44 |
Austin Q - coming back to the text (pasted below) which you found, I wondered whether Elizabeth's mother might be the mother of Tom Daley? I think his mother is Bridget Daley, born Bridget Carroll in Glasgow in 1869. This would mean she would have been around 15 when she had Elizabeth to Luke Jacques, if this was true. However, I can't seem to link Bridget with Elizabeth either. Can't seem to find Bridget in the 1891 or 1901 censuses and by 1911 Elizabeth certainly isn't living with her. |
|||
|
AKayeLibrarian | Report | 13 Apr 2018 19:44 |
Austin Q - coming back to the text (pasted below) which you found, I wondered whether Elizabeth's mother might be the mother of Tom Daley? I think his mother is Bridget Daley, born Bridget Carroll in Glasgow in 1869. This would mean she would have been around 15 when she had Elizabeth to Luke Jacques, if this was true. However, I can't seem to link Bridget with Elizabeth either. Can't seem to find Bridget in the 1891 or 1901 censuses and by 1911 Elizabeth certainly isn't living with her. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 13 Apr 2018 21:22 |
Just listing a couple of births, as a long shot , in case Elizabeth was Bridget's daughter: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 13 Apr 2018 21:33 |
Just for the record - not sure if already posted. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 13 Apr 2018 22:00 |
The family in 1901: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 13 Apr 2018 22:11 |
Bridget in 1891 ?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
AKayeLibrarian | Report | 13 Apr 2018 22:17 |
Hmm, no Elizabeth then. Thanks for this. Maybe one of Thomas' sisters marries one of the Marshalls and lives in Tyne Street rather than it being our Elizabeth. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 13 Apr 2018 22:29 |
Marriages Jun 1912 (>99%) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 13 Apr 2018 22:36 |
Deaths Sep 1959 (>99%) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 13 Apr 2018 22:40 |
Births Jun 1913 (>99%) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 13 Apr 2018 22:55 |
Sadly, the death of the son Edward: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Chris Ho :) | Report | 14 Apr 2018 06:15 |
(was looking last night, saw below) |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 14 Apr 2018 08:17 |
I wasn't sure if the articles were connected. I don't think they were as William and Elizabeth got married in Tynemouth. AG found the correct 36 Tyne Street in 1911 (the Longstaff residence). |
|||
|
Chris Ho :) | Report | 14 Apr 2018 08:23 |
(apologies AQ, think I got muddled then, lol) |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 14 Apr 2018 08:27 |
I don't think I helped!! I should've made my mistake clear when AG found the Tyne Street in Tynemouth |
|||
|
AKayeLibrarian | Report | 14 Apr 2018 08:51 |
Not to worry. I should have worked that out for myself! I obviously wasn't being systematic enough with my research. I should know better :-) |