Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Joseph Hudson 1808-1878 Cheshire
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
BurgessRae | Report | 31 Oct 2017 03:31 |
So far I have confirmed that there were 2 children - Jane Hudson born 1838 (married James Birchenall) and Joseph Hudson (born 1851). I cannot find any record of Hannah from the 1841 census and so I wonder if Jane might have also been known as Hannah. Still no luck with the Mum's maiden name. Looks like I'll order some certificates and see how I go. I'll let this feed know how I get on. |
|||
|
BurgessRae | Report | 31 Oct 2017 03:31 |
So far I have confirmed that there were 2 children - Jane Hudson born 1838 (married James Birchenall) and Joseph Hudson (born 1851). I cannot find any record of Hannah from the 1841 census and so I wonder if Jane might have also been known as Hannah. Still no luck with the Mum's maiden name. Looks like I'll order some certificates and see how I go. I'll let this feed know how I get on. |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 30 Oct 2017 14:56 |
That was my thinking Rootgatherer, as my gt gt had two wives named Annie, marrying between one census and the next, so the difference in age was the only thing giving the clue that they were not one and the same wife :-) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 30 Oct 2017 14:40 |
No problem Nyx. It is always best to be aware of ages given on census as it has been known for a second wife to have the same Christian name as the first. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 30 Oct 2017 14:16 |
My apologies, I was just dipping in and hadn't noticed that the age had been noticed and mentioned already. :-) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 30 Oct 2017 13:55 |
Joseph |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 30 Oct 2017 13:44 |
The 1861 census is the only way one that seems to give Hannah's birth year as 1836. I posted the census above and did say that on the image her age is entered as 25 years quite clearly. Jane is also on the census aged 25 years and the writing is quite clear. Perhaps the enumerator was dyslexic :-) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 30 Oct 2017 11:51 |
AAhhh but on the 1871 she was born 1810 / 11 ?? |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 30 Oct 2017 11:39 |
Just noticed the wife Hannah Hudson on the 1861 was born 1836, so 28 years younger than Joseph so definitely not Jane's mother. ( sorry if I'm stating what was obvious to everyone else lol). |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 30 Oct 2017 11:10 |
|
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 30 Oct 2017 10:37 |
Trees on Ancestry say that the Jane Hudson who married James Birchenall was the daughter of Joseph Hudson & Hannah Sweetman. This Joseph was a fruiterer & farmer. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 30 Oct 2017 09:09 |
The Joseph who married in 1834 was a Cordwainer (shoe maker): |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 30 Oct 2017 09:03 |
Jane |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 30 Oct 2017 08:46 |
You may already have this but posting it just because it came up in my search. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 30 Oct 2017 08:30 |
The age for Hannah in 1861 is quite clearly 25 years on the 1861 census image. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
BurgessRae | Report | 30 Oct 2017 07:06 |
Wondering if anyone has any other ideas. The children seem to have been born in Macclesfield so I'm not sure this is the right couple. Also, seems odd that daughter's Jane and Hannah were born in 1838 but the next child Joseph not born until 1852. I wonder if I'm accidently combining two families. |
|||
|
BurgessRae | Report | 30 Oct 2017 03:04 |
I've found a Joseph Hudson who married Hannah Jackson in 1834, but it's in Lancashire - no 100% convinced it is the right couple, but maybe. |
|||
|
BurgessRae | Report | 30 Oct 2017 01:22 |
Sorry if this is a silly question (I'm a bit of a beginner). Do you think this means the wife's maiden name is Jackson? ie we are looking for Hannah Jackson? |
|||
|
safc | Report | 30 Oct 2017 00:46 |
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
BurgessRae | Report | 30 Oct 2017 00:43 |
Thanks, yes, I think that may be the daughter Jane who marries into the Birchenall family and appears on later censuses. It's funny the 1841 census does not have her, but does have a daughter Hannah. |