Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Grandmother adopted 1919 help please
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
hayler | Report | 4 Feb 2017 11:06 |
Ok Austin that is great information thankyou, I must have the wrong kirby that died in 1920. Strange she is on electoral roll as Jamieson, but he puts her as Rosina Kirby, not sure if they did ever marry. Her death cert states Rosina Jamieson previous Kirby and widower of mr john Kirby. Did people use their partners name although they werent married ? Strange |
|||
|
hayler | Report | 4 Feb 2017 11:14 |
Austin very helpful thankyou but confusing why she is using his surname although not married which seems the case, great we have now got Jamieson first name, very helpful. The husband I had for her john kirby I have death being 1920. |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 4 Feb 2017 11:25 |
It is likely that she was still married when she was living with William in 1918, but just took on the Jamieson surname. Lots of people did it (including my Grandparents- my gran (also my Grandad's housekeeper) eventually took on his surname even though they weren't married. (They couldn't marry as his wife was still living) |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 4 Feb 2017 11:36 |
I'm not sure that 1920 death is correct- that is for a John W Kirby, but your John married with no initial. |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 4 Feb 2017 11:52 |
Your John is possibly the top birth- although you would need his marriage cert to confirm father's name & occupation: |
|||
|
hayler | Report | 4 Feb 2017 12:02 |
Ok so couples didnt have to be married then to adopt a baby ? |
|||
|
hayler | Report | 4 Feb 2017 12:05 |
I am trying to contact London Metropolitan Archives to find maternity records of Sarah Annie Baker , if I can get her birth date or age will be much more helpful. |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 4 Feb 2017 12:12 |
Adoption/ childcare did not run in the same way as today. |
|||
|
hayler | Report | 4 Feb 2017 13:29 |
Very interesting, so is it a possibility then that Sarah Annie Baker knew the Jamiesons ? |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 4 Feb 2017 15:15 |
Maybe she did as Rosina had daughter also with middle name Margaret. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 4 Feb 2017 15:31 |
KIRBY, ROSINA MARGARET BERYL mms SAMUELS |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
hayler | Report | 11 May 2017 10:34 |
Thank you to Kay??? I sent a request to see birth records to London Metropolitan Archives which have been received and the birth mother Sarah Annie Baker was 32 yrs at time of birth in 1919. this helps me move forward in hopefully finding any descendants. If anybody can help in finding anymore information on Sarah Annie Baker born 1886 I believe she maybe the daughter of John William Baker and Sarah E Coatsworth born in Thornaby on Tees. 1911 census living in Kensington as Servant. in 1919 when she gave birth she was living at 8 Macroom road London as a Domestic Servant. I am now looking for a possible marriage for her or where she lived from there on. thank you kind Regards Angela |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 11 May 2017 11:12 |
You have started another thread which really isn't fair on those who have helped on the same family on this thread |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
hayler | Report | 11 May 2017 12:13 |
Yes realised that after I had done it, hence why I then reposted in original thread |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 11 May 2017 12:31 |
Newer replies are on the other thread, so probably best to continue on there. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
greyghost | Report | 11 May 2017 12:32 |
You have again put wrong mmn (Stockton) on this thread, although corrected over on the other to Coatsworth. EDIT- now changed. |