Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
5 Aug 2016 21:00 |
It pays to always look at the image of a census ............... in the 1861 Census, Thomas Latta is living in the same house as Richard and Cetherine Leatherbarrow, with two sons
1861 Census
Name: Richard Leatherbarrow Age: 23 Estimated birth year: 1838 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Catherine Leatherbarrow Gender: Male Where born: Salford, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Salford Ecclesiastical parish: St Phillip Town: Salford County/Island: Lancashire Country: England
Registration district: Salford Sub-registration district: Regent Road ED, institution, or vessel: 12
Household schedule number: 57 Piece: 2921 Folio: 53 Page Number: 8
Richard Leatherbarrow 23 Boot Maker Catherine Leatherbarrow 25 b.ca 1836, Liverpool
Name: Thomas Latta Age: 55 Estimated birth year: 1806 Relation: Head Gender: Male Where born: Ireland Civil Parish: Salford Ecclesiastical parish: St Phillip Town: Salford County/Island: Lancashire Country: England
Registration district: Salford Sub-registration district: Regent Road ED, institution, or vessel: 12
Household schedule number: 58 Piece: 2921 Folio: 53 Page Number: 8
Thomas Latta 55 b.ca 1806, Ireland, Widower, Shoe Maker Frank Latta 17 b.ca 1844, Ireland, Baker Robert Latta 14 b.ca 1847, Ireland, Iron Moulder John Dabler 20 Lodger Samuel Whiteman 21 Lodger Alexander Nigbor 60
Address:- 25 Middlewood St
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
5 Aug 2016 20:24 |
Surely Dinah cannot be the daughter of Richard Leatherbarrow and Catherine Latta as Dinah's birth predates their marriage
The interesting thing about the 1851 Census for Catherine Latta is that she is the ONLY person shown as born in Liverpool ........ father (widower) and younger siblings are all shown as born in Ireland.
It raises the interesting question of whether father (and ?mother) moved to Liverpool where Catherine was born and then moved right back to iIeland to have the second and subsequent children.
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
5 Aug 2016 19:53 |
don't forget that "son-in-law" was a very common usage for "stepson" back in those days.
Granted the usage of that meaning of "son-in-law" had largely disappeared by the 1880s, but it could still have been an acceptable term.
So, it might not have been a "mistake" by the census taker, but the deliberate term used by whoever gave him the information.
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
5 Aug 2016 13:08 |
Just thinking aloud re the Leatherbarrows:
safc posted the 1871, when the YOB of both Richard and Catherine was given as 1817 (and the image clearly says they were aged 54) - and Catherine was born Ireland. Mary posted the 1881 (but called it 1891) , when their YOB was 1938, and Catherine was born Liverpool.
1861 agrees with 1881, with YOB a couple of years out.
Catherine Leatherbarrow in the 1861 England Census Name: Catherine Leatherbarrow Age: 25 Estimated birth year: 1836 Relation: Wife Spouse's Name: Richard Leatherbarrow Gender: Female Where born: Liverpool, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Salford Ecclesiastical parish: St Phillip Town: Salford County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Registration district: Salford Sub-registration district: Regent Road ED, institution, or vessel: 12 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 57 Piece: 2921 Folio: 53 Page Number: 8 Household Members: Name Age Richard Leatherbarrow 23 Catherine Leatherbarrow 25
As does 1851 when Richard is with his parents and siblings (also some visitors named Marsh whom I haven't copied):
Richard Letherbarrow in the 1851 England Census Name: Richard Letherbarrow Age: 13 Estimated birth year: abt 1838 Relation: Son Father's name: Thomas Letherbarrow Mother's name: Sarah Ann Letherbarrow Gender: Male Where born: Salford, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Manchester Ecclesiastical parish: Trinity Church Phillimore Ecclesiastical Parish Maps: View related Ecclesiastical Parish County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Registration district: Salford Sub-registration district: Regent Road ED, institution, or vessel: 01b Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 13 Piece: 2224 Folio: 33 Page Number: 3 Household Members: Name Age Thomas Letherbarrow 39 Sarah Ann Letherbarrow 34 Richard Letherbarrow 13 Ellen Letherbarrow 11 William Lethebarrow 7 Thomas Lethebarrow 1 Hannah Lethebarrow 3
Alice seems to have lived with the Leatherbarrows rather than her parents . In 1881 she's listed as "servant".
In 1871 it says James is son-in-law to Richard. Clearly not literally, if Dinah's surname was Smith. So it should mean he was Richard's step-son. But Catherine and Richard were both born c1838, so Catherine would be far too young for James to be her son, and Richard would also be far too young to have fathered him with someone else. They were only children themselves when James was born.
So I suspect that "son-in-law" re James in 1881 is another mistake by the census-taker, along with the wildly wrong ages for Richard and Catherine, and Catherine's wrong POB. Probably James and Dinah were just lodgers or visitors, and no relation at all.
|
|
Mary
|
Report
|
5 Aug 2016 10:16 |
1861 21,liverpool Street Regent Rd D24>4 Head David turner 1820 Salford James Atkinson 20 Salford Apprentice Bootmaker.
Maryb.
|
|
cane
|
Report
|
5 Aug 2016 09:56 |
Many thanks Chris Ho ....Its a lot to take in, Thank you to everyone... :-) :-) <3
|
|
cane
|
Report
|
5 Aug 2016 09:53 |
Mary thank you ..I was going to pack it in with this leatherbarrow lot but the info you have found is very interesting :-) and the confirmation of Alice ann :-)
|
|
cane
|
Report
|
5 Aug 2016 09:46 |
WOW :-) Sylvia thank you :-) I can't work the leatherbarrow's out. I know there is a james and Dinah and a one and a half year old daughter Alice ann (of whome I can't find anything with these parents). a marriage certificate would make it that much easier..it even got me thinking that james had been married before and Dinah was his second marriage after all there is a good ten yrs age gap between them both :-S :-S
|
|
Chris Ho :)
|
Report
|
4 Aug 2016 20:17 |
http://www.lattafamilyorigins.org/EngFemaleMarrs1837-1950.html
(according to above, Father of Catherine Latta, was Thomas)
Lancashire Marriage indexes for the years: 1859
LEATHERBARROW Richard LATTA Catherine Salford St Simon Salford C27/3/52
http://www.lancashirebmd.org.uk/index.php
Chris :)
(so Dinah is Sister of William, query below, would think less stressful to get a Birth Cert. and make sure you have correct Surname for Dinah!)
http://www.genesreunited.co.uk/boards/board/ancestors/thread/1355040
Chris :)
(reference from Mary above)
Lancashire Marriage indexes for the years: 1914
ATKINSON Alice A MOORE Ernest Hulme, St. Mark Manchester 5/7/442
Lancashire Death indexes for the years: 1893
ATKINSON Dinah 40 Chorlton-on-Medlock Archives+, Manchester Central Library CHO
Lancashire Birth indexes for the years: 1851
SMITH Dinah Elizabeth Hulme Archives+, Manchester Central Library
|
|
Mary
|
Report
|
4 Aug 2016 19:53 |
Alice Ann Atkinson born Salford Oct 1869. With parents 1871. and the leatherbarrow family
1881 4,Clowes Street Regent Road Salford. D1 >22 Richard leatherbarrow 43 Catherine 43 Liverpool. Nee Latta married 1859. Alice Ann Aarison 11 born Salford a servant view original and it says Atkinson
?? Alice Ann Atkinson spinster of 18,Edge street daughter of James a deceased shoemaker married Ernest Moore a widow 26/12/1914.
Maryb.
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
4 Aug 2016 19:20 |
I've found 4 other Atkinson baptisms on lancs opc ..... but no mmn :-(
Baptism: 16 Sep 1877 St Bartholomew, Salford, Lancashire, England William Atkinson - [Child] of James Atkinson & Dinah Elizabeth Born: 3 Mar 1877 Abode: 61 Melbourne Street Occupation: Shoemaker Baptised by: G. W. Petherick Source: LDS Film 1786460
Baptism: 2 Oct 1881 St Bartholomew, Salford, Lancashire, England Dinah Elizabeth Atkinson - [Child] of James Atkinson & Dinah Born: 21 Jun 1881 Abode: 24 Mary St. Phoebe Street Occupation: Shoe Maker Baptised by: Joseph Horrocks Register: Baptisms 1881 - 1884, Page 24, Entry 188 Source: LDS Film 1786460
Baptism: 19 Mar 1884 St Clement, Salford, Lancashire, England William Atkinson - [Child] of James Atkinson & Dinah Born: 21 Jul 1883 Abode: 28 Hyde Street Occupation: Shoemaker Notes: Chd. St B's. Aug. '83 Baptised by: C. V. Merriman Register: Baptisms 1883 - 1887, Page 18, Entry 1777 Source: LDS Film 1786422
Baptism: 26 Jan 1887 St Bartholomew, Salford, Lancashire, England Sarah Elizabeth Atkinson - [Child] of James Atkinson & Dinah Born: 20 Dec 1886 Abode: 104 Bigland St. Occupation: Shoe Maker Baptised by: G. W. Petherick Register: Baptisms 1886 - 1889, Page 54, Entry 593 Source: LDS Film 1786461
there don't seem to be any more baptisms for their children on that site.
another baptism on ancestry .........
England, Select Births and Christenings, 1538-1975
Name: Bertha Atkinson Gender: Female Baptism Date: 2 Sep 1885 Baptism Place: St. Bartholomew, Salford, Lancashire, England Father: James Atkinson Mother: Dinah FHL Film Number: 1786461 Reference ID: item 2 p 114
William born 1877 must have died as there is a second William baptised in 1884, but I cannot find a definitive burial record for him
|
|
cane
|
Report
|
4 Aug 2016 13:03 |
Thank you very much Sylvia, very much appreciated :-)
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
4 Aug 2016 01:18 |
George's baptism is on lancsopc ............. but doesn't give mmn
Baptism: 30 Mar 1879 St Bartholomew, Salford, Lancashire, England George Atkinson - [Child] of James Atkinson & Dinah Born: 7 Feb 1878 Abode: 38 Tamworth Street Occupation: Shoe Maker Baptised by: G. W. Petherick Source: LDS Film 1786460
|
|
cane
|
Report
|
3 Aug 2016 19:10 |
Thanks Pam
|
|
Pam
|
Report
|
3 Aug 2016 19:04 |
Births are listed on Lancashire BMD website but mother's name not included.
|
|
cane
|
Report
|
3 Aug 2016 18:39 |
AustinQ...im'e assuming that her maiden name is smith :-S
|
|
cane
|
Report
|
3 Aug 2016 18:34 |
Yes Malyon that 1861 census is what I have
|
|
cane
|
Report
|
3 Aug 2016 18:32 |
malyon yes I am thinking this is now a possibility Here's another Brick in the wall: John Smith married Elizabeth crook 27th june 1875 they state on the 1911 census that have five children Theses are the baptism's which I have found :john smith 1878 harpurhey.Ann smith 1880 Harpurhey.William smith 1882 harpurhey.Nellie 1883.Harpurhey.and May1894 .But on the 1891 census there is also a Elizabeth smith born 1890 and james henry smith born 1877 :-S :-S VERY BAFFLED
|
|
AustinQ
|
Report
|
3 Aug 2016 18:17 |
Do you have any birth certificates of Dinah's children to confirm her maiden name?
|
|
malyon
|
Report
|
3 Aug 2016 17:40 |
Dinah in 1861 census
Dinah E Smith England and Wales Census, 1861 Name Dinah E Smith County Lancashire Event Type Census Event Date 1861 Event Place Hulme, Lancashire, England Ecclesiastical Parish St Pauls Registration District Chorlton Residence Note Clayburn Street Gender Female Age 9 Marital Status Unmarried Relationship to Head of Household Daughter Birth Year (Estimated) 1852 Birthplace Manchester, Page Number 46 Registration Number RG09 Piece/Folio 2898 / 53 Affiliate Record Type Household
Household
Role
Gender
Age
Birthplace
Henry Smith Head M 37 Lepton Cromer, Yorkshire Ann Smith Wife F 37 Lepton Cromer, Yorkshire Dinah E Smith Daughter F 9 Manchester, John Smith Son M 7 Manchester, William Smith Son M 5 Manchester, James Smith Son M 2 Mancheste
|