Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
juju
|
Report
|
5 Jan 2016 20:21 |
So how would I trace him after this, their bigamist marriage or his death? I wouldn't have a clue...... what now to put into a search marriage or death cert?
|
|
juju
|
Report
|
5 Jan 2016 20:15 |
Thank you both I'm thinking the puzzle has been solved now, can't thank you enough Sylvia I believe your theory of :John Buchanan and Rose moved in together, said they were married on the 1911, but the children are Rose's Wonder what happened to cause his paralysis? probably tripped when he was legging it ha ha!!
;-)
|
|
lancashireAnn
|
Report
|
3 Jan 2016 15:27 |
re the other 3 Sarah Jane's
both Thomas Edwin & Sarah Jane Williams are on cheshirebmd subdistrict Chester Castle whereas the other 3 Sarah are not
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
3 Jan 2016 00:49 |
well,
I'm now using both ancestry and FindMyPast ............ haven't had a sub to FMP for longer than a month before, but OH bought it for me for Christmas (and I got a deal for him :-D )
I'm finding FMP has quite a lot of records that ancestry doesn't have .............
but really wouldn't want to sway you.
I find ancestry easier to use, even after the latest updates ................. I've been using it since 2004, so I think I must know my way around.
FMP doesn't seem as easy to use to me.
|
|
juju
|
Report
|
3 Jan 2016 00:11 |
Thanks, very well could be the case with him That's what I thought as I was reading it. the reasons he probably wasn't spoken of are becoming increasingly clear..... I've found someone who disappeared as a child then reappeared later listed as her biological mothers younger sister, it's amazing how things are covered up and over in families I need to get ancestry again such a good site ??
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
2 Jan 2016 22:44 |
I cannot find Thomas Edw*n Williams or Sarah Jane Williams with parents Samuel and Rose on the 1911 ............... though I might be missing something :-)
Theory ..................
John Buchanan and Rose moved in together, said they were married on the 1911, but the children are Rose's
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
2 Jan 2016 22:38 |
Take this as you will ..................
this might be the baptism of Thomas Edwin born September quarter 1904, from FMP ...............
Diocese of Chester parish registers of baptisms c1538-1910
First name(s) Thomas Edwin Last name Williams Gender Male Birth year 1904 Birth date 07 Aug 1904 Baptism year 1904 Baptism date 09 Sep 1904 Place Chester, St John County Cheshire Country England Father's first name(s) Samuel Father's last name Williams Mother's first name(s) Rose Record set Cheshire Diocese of Chester parish baptisms 1538-1911 Category Life Events (BDMs) Subcategory Births & baptisms Collections from United Kingdom
from image:-
Born Aug 7 1904 Address:- 17 Leadworks Lane Father occupation:- Soldier
Diocese of Chester parish registers of baptisms c1538-1910
First name(s) Sarah Jane Last name Williams Gender Female Birth year 1906 Birth date 09 Jun 1906 Baptism year 1906 Baptism date 29 Jul 1906 Place Chester, St John County Cheshire Country England Father's first name(s) Samuel Father's last name Williams Mother's first name(s) Rose Record set Cheshire Diocese of Chester parish baptisms 1538-1911 Category Life Events (BDMs) Subcategory Births & baptisms Collections from United Kingdom
from image:-
Born:- June 9 1906 Address:- 17 Leadworks Lane Father occupation:- Labourer
now to see if there is a Samuel and Rose Williams on the 1911 Census :-)
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
2 Jan 2016 22:27 |
can't see any births for Buchanan with those names ..........
??????? assuming that "born in Chester" on the 1911 meant the births were registered in Chester
Births Sep 1904 (>99%) WILLIAMS Thomas Edwin Chester 8a 382
Births Jun 1906 (>99%) Williams Sarah Jane Chester 8a 397
although there are also these registrations in Chester for Sarah Jane's
Births Mar 1907 (>99%) GAWTHORPE Sarah Jane Chester 8a 377 YOUDE Sarah Jane Chester 8a 356
Births Mar 1908 (>99%) Roberts Sarah Jane Chester 8a 376
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
2 Jan 2016 22:08 |
Oh ................
just noticed that there is an entry in the Infirmity column for John .................. right side paralyzed
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
2 Jan 2016 22:07 |
well done!!!
here's the ancestry version ...............
1911 Wales Census
Name: John Buchanan Age in 1911: 35 Estimated birth year: abt 1876 Relation to Head: Head Gender: Male Civil Parish: Wrexham Regis Search Photos: Search for 'Wrexham Regis' in the UK City, Town and Village Photos collection County/Island: Denbighshire Country: Wales Street address: 4 McDermotts Court York St Wrexham Marital Status: Married Years Married: 9 Estimated Marriage Year: 1902 Occupation: Pedlar Registration district: Wrexham Registration District Number: 621 Sub-registration district: Wrexham ED, institution, or vessel: 38 Household schedule number: 15 Piece: 34065
John Buchanan 35 Rose Buchanan 28 b.ca 1883, Thomas Edwen Buchanan 6 b.ca 1905 Sarah Jane Buchanan 4 b.ca 1907
Image for birthplace of both John and Rose is Whitchurch, Salop, and the children were born in Chester
I'll try to add that information, if I can
Interesting that he says he and Rose married in 1902, and the first child was born in 1905 ??????
|
|
juju
|
Report
|
2 Jan 2016 20:14 |
I think today is the day I could have found him...... Although I haven't seen all of the household for this census, year & place of birth, year of marriage are the same and the proximity of Whitchurch to Wrexham roughly 16 miles
1911 England, Wales & Scotland Census First Name John Last Name Buchanan Birth Year 1876 Age 35 Where Born Whitchurch Salop Relationship To Head of Household Head Gender Male Condition Married Year Of Marriage 1902 Years Of Marriage 9 Occupation Pedlar Military Info Address 4 Mc Dermotts Court York Street Wrexham Parish Wrexham Regis County Denbighshire Country Wales Ecclesiastical District Enumeration District 38 Registration District Wrexham Registration District Number 621 SubDistrict Number 3 Category Census, Land & Surveys Record set 1911 Census for England & Wales Collections from Great Britain Census Reference RG14PN34065 RG78PN1965 RD621 SD3 ED38 SN15 Archive Reference RG14 Folio Page Piece Number 34065
|
|
juju
|
Report
|
2 Jan 2016 01:41 |
Wow Thanks!! <3 Yes theres no reason really if its transcribed....... just LOOK. I found on one of mine where it had been changed from the paternal side of Diggle to Walkers wife's maiden name of Mann including their children glad I realised too....... Well 01.39am time fly's doing this eh? So sorry...... haven't wished you All A Very Happy New Year
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
2 Jan 2016 01:18 |
How would you like Hayhurst transcribed as Porst????????????
that was one of OH's ancestors
It was the modern-day transcriber who made the error in both your Buchanan and my Hayhurst :-)
The image on yours clearly showed Buchanan ............... if you'd only looked a bit more closely at it!
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
2 Jan 2016 01:15 |
Someone had submitted a name correction for Samuel on that census, I added the change for the rest of the family earlier today :-)
|
|
juju
|
Report
|
2 Jan 2016 00:50 |
Ha! I've just found these on Family search just adding them all :-) Just shows how on the census spellings are so phonetic I can almost hear their Irish brogue in the pronounced " Buckanna" V Buchanan
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
2 Jan 2016 00:12 |
1871 Census
Name: Samuel Buchanan Age: 32 Estimated birth year: abt 1839 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Susanna Buchanan Gender: Male Where born: Mayo, Ireland Civil Parish: Newcastle under Lyme Ecclesiastical parish: St George County/Island: Staffordshire Country: England Registration district: Newcastle Under Lyme Sub-registration district: Newcastle under Lyme ED, institution, or vessel: 14 Household schedule number: 63 Piece: 2833 Folio: 85 Page Number: 13
Samuel Buchanan 32 Labourer Susanna Buchanan 25 b.ca 1846, Mayo, Ireland James Buchanan 5 Samuel Buchanan 3 Martha Buchanan 9 Months
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
2 Jan 2016 00:08 |
You're probably correct about Ireland ...............
1881 Census
Name: Samuel Buchanan Age: 43 Estimated birth year: abt 1838 Relationship to Head: Head Spouse: Susannah Buchanan Gender: Male Where born: Ireland Civil Parish: Whitchurch County/Island: Shropshire Country: England Street address: Folly Lane Marital Status: Married
Occupation: Farm Labourer Registration district: Whitchurch ED, institution, or vessel: 4
Piece: 2670 Folio: 76 Page Number: 15
Samuel Buchanan 43 Susannah Buchanan 33 b.ca 1848, Ireland James Buchanan 14 b.ca 1867, Newcastle, Staffordshire Samuel Buchanan 12 Martha Buchanan 10 Mary Ann Buchanan 8 John Buchanan 6 Robert Buchanan 2
1891 Census
Name: Samuel Buckanna [Samuel Buchanan] Age: 52 Estimated birth year: abt 1839 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Susannah Buckanna Gender: Male Where born: Ireland Civil Parish: Whitchurch Ecclesiastical parish: Whitchurch Town: Broughall County/Island: Shropshire Country: England
Registration district: Whitchurch ED, institution, or vessel: 11
Piece: 2125 Folio: 147 Page Number: 4
Samuel Buckanna 52 Susannah Buckanna 42 b.ca 1849, Ireland James Buckanna 24 Mary A Buckanna 18 John Buckanna 15 Robert Buckanna 11 William Buckanna 6 Eliza J Buckanna 3
|
|
juju
|
Report
|
1 Jan 2016 23:31 |
Yes Sylvia Susannah was his mothers name, I'm sure they were from Mayo Ireland
|
|
juju
|
Report
|
1 Jan 2016 23:27 |
I'm inclined to agree on the scarper idea, ( Genetic trait) ;-) But surely he couldn't get away with being incognito for the rest of his life, however that was? Im at a loss, hope he's having a good laugh, bless him...
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
1 Jan 2016 23:03 |
the "intrigue" sort of indicates that he may have scarpered!!
That would not be all that unusual ................. marriages did break down then just as much, if not more, as they do now, but divorce was all but impossible to obtain and extremely expensive. So spouses separated, both may have stayed in the same town or one may have moved elsewhere. It was not unusual for the woman to say she was still married or to tell people she was widowed.
Nor was it unusual for the separated spouses to marry bigamously, although most do seem to wait until the other spouse has died even though they may have taken on another partner and have more children.
it does seem that your John was the one born in Shropshire, with the father Samuel ............ although Samuel is an Ag Lab on the 2 censuses that I found not a Gardener. However, elevation of parent's job is also not unusual :-)
|