Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Trying to trace William Peatman b1840 Lincoln
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Julie | Report | 4 Jan 2015 09:44 |
ArgyllGran, having had a look at the 1841 census entries, they relate to locations in the fenland area of the county i.e. South East, rather than North West where Long Bennington is situated, so I don't think they are related. It struck me that if Maria was the mother, William might have been with her parents in 1841, but I have yet to trace who they were. I do have a William & Maria at Halloughton where Maria was supposedly born, but have found them on the 1841 census simply as a couple. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 4 Jan 2015 09:10 |
Chris/Astra, the William in the 1853 death is the son of Jesse, who is in fact from the Long Bennington Peatmans. Likewise the 1856 death is another William, this time an older adult male, is also a member from the same Peatmans. Many of the Peatmans lived in the Newark registration district although they were in Lincolnshire. |
|||
|
Chris Ho :) | Report | 4 Jan 2015 08:26 |
Burial |
|||
|
Astra | Report | 4 Jan 2015 06:44 |
I think you also have to consider the two William Peatman deaths in Newark Registration district in 1853 and 1856 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 3 Jan 2015 20:50 |
Thanks for the additional info, which I will follow up. I think William may indeed have gone to Canada. His uncle was already in Montreal & I have traced some other census entries in that city consistent with him. If correct he went to Canada in 1852, which although he would only have been 12 is possible, given that his uncle was there. I haven't attempted to trace anyone in Canada before so I am feeling my way round to find sources of info. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 3 Jan 2015 18:47 |
I should have said the ages were usually rounded down in 1841! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
malyon | Report | 3 Jan 2015 18:23 |
hi |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 2 Jan 2015 18:35 |
ArgyllGran, thanks for the clarification about the age mistranscription, I have come across 1841 census data with adult ages not rounded. I have located a John & Mary Coulson at North Carlton, given as place of birth for Ann, by way of some baptisms at the local parish church, no Ann, but the non-conformist bapt you found at Market Rasen could relate. The couple could have also migrated into Lincoln by 1841. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 2 Jan 2015 18:21 |
Ages were rounded down to the nearest 5 years, so Mary could have been anything up to 44 in 1841. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 2 Jan 2015 18:03 |
ArgyllGran - census data consistently indicates Ann was born 1818, so this may be her parents, albeit Mary would have been quite young when she conceived. As you say it still doesn't locate William in 1841. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 2 Jan 2015 17:53 |
As William was christened in the church of St Nicholas in Newport, Lincoln, I would hazard a guess that these might be Ann's parents in 1841 - in which case he's not with them, either: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 2 Jan 2015 17:36 |
Chris, yes the marriage of Ann followng the death of John does fit. The burial in 1846 is actually John's sister Ann rather than his wife. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 2 Jan 2015 17:33 |
Thanks ArgyllGran, I had just found the marriage on the Lincs Marriages database myself & started looking for John. For some reason I had the marriage as being at Long Bennington when it clearly was not. This perhaps makes the baptism in Lincoln a bit more credible as a child of John & Ann, but still doesn'ty explain where William was in 1841. |
|||
|
Chris Ho :) | Report | 2 Jan 2015 17:30 |
County Lincolnshire |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 2 Jan 2015 17:25 |
This one's a possibility: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 2 Jan 2015 17:20 |
Ann's father's name was John: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 2 Jan 2015 17:11 |
Some of you were posting whilst I was putting the last reply together. I haven't looked for William with his other grandparents, in fact I don't even have parents for Ann yet. I did think about the birth cert, but if John & Ann were prepared to pass themselves off as parents for the baptism, they may well have also reg'd the birth on that basis. The Quebec census entry is interesting as an earlier Peatman was in Montreal for many years & I note that Elizabeth daughter of Joseph & Maria is shown as born in Canada. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 2 Jan 2015 17:03 |
Thanks all, some of the information about John & Ann, & Joseph & Maria, is detail I hadn't turned up yet so will be useful. William does seem to be a bit of a mystery. |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 2 Jan 2015 16:59 |
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Astra | Report | 2 Jan 2015 16:58 |
Maybe he too went to Montreal |
|||
Researching: |