Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Dea
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2014 10:10 |
Could be this one??
1871 England Census about William Tarner Name: William Tarner [William Turner] Age: 10 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1861 Relation: Son Father's Name: William Turner Mother's name: Hephzibah Tarner Gender: Male Where born: Croydon, Surrey, England Civil Parish: Hammersmith Ecclesiastical parish: St John County/Island: London Country: England Registration district: Kensington Sub-registration district: St Paul Hammersmith ED, institution, or vessel: 17 Household schedule number: 155 Piece: 63 Folio: 44 Page Number: 34 Household Members: Name Age William Turner 44 Carpenter Hephzibah Tarner 44 George Tarner 21 Julia Tarner 17 Abraham Tarner 14 John Tarner 10 William Tarner 10 Matilda Tarner 9 Emma Tarner 4 Frederich Tarner 2 Risa Bushard 73
Source Citation: Class: RG10; Piece: 63; Folio: 44; Page: 34; GSU roll: 824575.
Marriages Dec 1848 (>99%) BUSH Caroline Halstead 12 237 Scan available - click to view BYFLEET John Halstead 12 237 Scan available - click to view Daines Mary Halstead 12 237 Scan available - click to view LAVER Elizabeth Halstead 12 237 Scan available - click to view PANNELL Hephzibah Halstead 12 237 Scan available - click to view Pannell Hepzibah Halstead 12 237 Smith John Halstead 12 237 Scan available - click to view Turner William Halstead 12 237 Scan available - click to view Wilks Robert Halstead 12 237 Scan available - click to view
Have to rush out just now but will follow it properly when I get back,
Dea x
|
|
Ru
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2014 10:54 |
Hello Susan,
Just off to bed, but yes I do have the death cert. for William 15/12/1903, his occupation was Licensed Victuallers "footman"(?). No parents names on this only address 288 Tabard Street. and his wife was the informant Amy Turner. Tabard Street Newington.
Hope this helps.
Thanks
|
|
Ru
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2014 10:56 |
Thanks Dea,
Will get back on this. JUust off to bed now. Catch you all in the morning.
Thank you all so much.
Sappho
|
|
Ru
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2014 11:48 |
Hello Dea,
Just had another look at this one you added.
thank you for this and I was a bit excited, but the Tarner family are in the 1891 CEnsus and are a family with th name Tarner and not Turner despite the encouragement of your 1861 Census listing.
Good try though.
I am needing to do this by address I think. But JoonieCloonie is right - doubtful there will be answers via the address. I was just hoping that Wiliam and Amy may have had a relative like father. etc living with them, but guess not.
Still will wait for the certificate to seed if we can shed light on William's father.
Thanks again. :-)
|
|
JoonieCloonie
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2014 13:27 |
I'm confused again :-)
the marriage record for that couple is in the name Turner, and someone has corrected the surname at Ancestry to Turner from Tarner (without giving the least explanation of course)
the image is really quite clearly Turner I think, and in 1881 that is what Ancestry transcribes it as (Hephzybah Turner 1827)
the image for the 1891 couple in St Geo the Martyr that Ancestry links to (William 30, Amelia 28) is also clearly Turner
Tarner does seem to be a name, but a rather unusual one, and at Ancestry it is definitely more often a mistranscription than a real name
(similar to Barner, most of Ancestry's Barner-s being misread Barnes-s, etc)
heavens, in 1901 Ancestry has the family as Turnex !
can you post some details of the 1891 census for this family? as I can't locate them in that year
This isn't to say they are your Turners, just not to rule them out, out of hand :-)
|
|
Chris Ho :)
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2014 13:49 |
http://www.genesreunited.co.uk/boards/board/ancestors/thread/1326659?d=asc
(reference)
(would it be Potman on 1903 Death Cert., notice same for occ. on 1901 Marriage TC Povey/Johannah)
(apologies, above Census I posted is 1901!) (now deleted)
Chris :)
|
|
Chris Ho :)
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2014 14:08 |
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it Report 12 Oct 2012 22:29
Thomas on the 1891 census
1891 census transcription details for: 17, Clarendon Street, St George The Martyr Southwark, Southwark
Print Close National Archive Reference: RG number: RG12 Piece: 344 Folio: 137 Page: 5 Reg. District: St Saviour Southwark Sub District: Kent Road Parish: St George the Martyr Southwark Enum. District: 6 Ecclesiastical District: St Stephens City/Municipal Borough: Southwark Address: 17, Clarendon Street, St George The Martyr Southwark, Southwark County: London Name Relation Condition Sex Age Birth Year Occupation , Disability Where Born TURNER, William Head Married M 30 1861 Labourer London TURNER, Amelia Wife Married F 28 1863 London TURNER, Hannah Daughter F 10 1881 Scholar St George Southwark TURNER, Thomas Son M 6 1885 Scholar St George Southwark TURNER, Louise Daughter F 0 (8M) 1891 St George Southwark
1901 that you have already seen 1901 census transcription details for: 3, Hunter Buildings B Block, Little Hunter Street, St George The Martyr Southwark
Print Close National Archive Reference: RG number: RG13 Piece: 364 Folio: 33 Page: 19 Reg. District: St Saviour Southwark Sub District: Kent Road Parish: St George the Martyr Southwark Enum. District: 8 Ecclesiastical District: St Stephens Southwark City/Municipal Borough: Address: 3, Hunter Buildings B Block, Little Hunter Street, St George The Martyr Southwark County: London Name Relation Condition Sex Age Birth Year Occupation , Disability Where Born TURNER, William Head Married M 41 1860 Labourer Brick Seth Borough TURNER, Amy Wife Married F 40 1861 Borough TURNER, Jemima Daughter Single F 20 1881 Paper Sorter Borough TURNER, Thomas Son Single M 16 1885 Labourer Brick Seth Borough TURNER, William Son Single M 8 1893 Borough TURNER, Amy Daughter Single F 6 1895 Borough
both William and Thomas are labourers in a Brick Yard
************************************************************** (ah!, was it above 1891, from below)
http://www.genesreunited.co.nz/boards/board/living_relatives/thread/1274755?d=asc&page=2
Chris :)
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2014 14:12 |
Joonie - I think this is the family I was looking at in 1891 - William Snr. seems to have a new wife but as William Jnr has reappeared with the family (he was missing in 1881), then it looks like this family is not the correct one, even though the occupation for Wm Snr did match !!! .......dratt!! :-(
1891 England, Wales & Scotland Census Transcription Conningham Road, Hammersmith, Fulham, London, England Print transcription View image Household Members First name(s) Last name Relationship Marital status Gender Age Birth year Occupation Birth place William Turner Head Married Male 64 1827 Carpenter Southend Transcription Elizabeth Turner Wife Married Female 64 1827 - Southend Transcription William Turner Son Single Male 31 1860 Bricklayer Hammersmith, Middlesex, England Transcription Florence Turner Daughter Single Female 28 1863 - Bromley Transcription Abraham Turner Son Married Male 34 1857 Barman Hammersmith, Middlesex, England Transcription Minnie Turner Daughter In Law Married Female 25 1866 - Kent, England Transcription Florence Turner Daughter - Female 10 1881 Scholar Hammersmith, Middlesex, England Transcription Herbert Turner Son - Male 8 1883 Scholar Hammersmith, Middlesex, England
NB Their widowed daughter Julia Parker is living at the same adress with her son Albert (mentioned in 1881)
Source Citation: Class: RG12; Piece: 40; Folio: 141; Page: 15; GSU Roll: 6095150.
Dea x
|
|
Ru
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2014 17:00 |
Firstly thanks everyone for all the information.
ChrisHo has the right connection from previous research when I was seeking information on Amy Turner who we established married George Smith.
Sorry, but did try to avoid all the information I had already collected as I thought I would search addresses to establish just one part of the family - namely William Turner b 1860/1 - his father - William (James?) Turner.
It is so confusing and as I said it was not going to be easy with all those Turners.
I did not get involved in changing Turner to Tarner and was only aware of this through Dea's 'detective'work. I always think there is a danger in getting information changed without the correct proof by way of certificates.
Thank you again Dea, but the above may be realted, but not my direct line of Turners.
I am still seeking previous information for the family on 1891 census.
Back soon.
Sappho
|
|
Ru
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2014 17:10 |
Chris Ho,
Your last Census listing is correct with Jemima being incorrect as it should be Johanna (h) - my grandmother. This is definitely my family. William who died aged 13 must have been working from a young age, but that is the family without doubt. I have all the certificates for the relevant births, marriages and deaths.
The relative in London trying to go back one step further to get William's father William has prompted me to check via the address which is a chance search, but appears not the way to go. I wish they'd had the foresight to use different names for their children as it certainly is confusing.
Thanks so much for sharing your research thoughts and findings. We shall see what my London relative comes up with by way of William's (b1860/1) Biorth certificate. I could not confirm exactly which birth reference was for my William Turner so did not send - satisfied myself with the marriage certificate being correct mainly due to the names and the witness names - Jane Noble being Amy's sister confirmed.
Again many, many thanks, what great people you are.
Kind regards, Sappho
|
|
Chris Ho :)
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2014 17:18 |
Births Dec 1860 (>99%) ---------------------------------------------------------- TURNER William James Kensington 1a 4
(do you mean above for Birth Cert. ordered?)
Still not sure which address you was looking for...
Chris :)
edits
(1891 found by Shirley, from another query!, google brings it up when looking for Turner Clarendon Street)
|
|
Ru
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2014 17:23 |
Chris Ho,
The previous thread on the Kybert information you found for me is the relative coming forward who is now in touch with me and seeking the father of my William Turner (b1860/1). I had given up going further back - too confusing.
Maybe the birth cert will give us a lead - not sure though as it may be more confusing.
Will come back. Cert due to be sent to my relative approx 27th October. :-S
|
|
Ru
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2014 17:26 |
the 1891 Census is the one above added by Chris Ho - Johannah becomes Hannah for some reason. Why they do this I do not know, but they cannot imagine that years ahead they cause their decendants a problem!!! :-D
|