Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Clarky123
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2014 07:12 |
I am hoping someone can help me...i am wasting so much time and money researching the remaining one member of my family tree- who just won't be found. I've taken everyone else lines back to 1600s but this one seems determined to remain an enigma....
Ok so I have details from a living aunty who's mother this person was that she was from Manchester originally, problem being that she died when this person was about 5 so she doesn't have any other information.
The scenario is she's my mums grandmother (paternal) I have her wedding certificate (her second marriage cert) and her death cert-
I know she married william armin in 1912 in Grimsby. they had one daughter. Florence Alice May Armin but she was born in Poplar london for some reason. can only think the fact he was navy has something to do with it.
William died in 1915 (WWI) and she went on to marry Walter Lampey in 1918 in west Ham. which is odd as my grandfather (their son) was born in aug 1918 in Grimsby- yet they married in Dec 1918 in West Ham!? (I'm not convinced he is my real grandfather as they don't look alike, which would explain this anomaly but ill never know)
i know from the cert that her fathers name was George and he was a labourer/ gardener. though on the record for her first marriage her name is spelled Whitely.
she died in 1927 aged 34 according to the death cert- which makes her birth year 1893 which is consistent with the marriage cert which says she was 25 in 1918.
all certs i have indicate she was born between 1893. however i have been unsuccessful in finding her birth or any census information for her to trace siblings and her parents. there are no george whiteleys (tried all spellings) in manchester. I did find one document which was a baptism in manchester at St augustines parish which suggested the birthdate was 30 april 1892 but the baptism was 1893 which could be why all docs say 1893
that shows a mother called sarah
one of my sessions found a goerge whiteley marrying a sarah payne in bury in 1891 but now i can't even reproduce that search result so am unsure where i found it. an 'expert' i contacted found an entry in 1911 in grimsby for a florrie whiteley who is 19 and is a servant to an older lady in a street in grimsby a street away from where she had my grandfather. but thats is all we've collectively found
all efforts to find anything else are driving me nuts..
can anyone help me?
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2014 07:23 |
I'm just posting this as information and reference ...........
this is same name, birth date more-or-less correct, but parents wrong
Manchester, England, Non-Conformist Births and Baptisms, 1758-1912 about Florence May Whitley
Name: Florence May Whitley Gender: Female Birth Date: 10 Mar 1893 Birth Place: Manchester, England Baptism Date: 30 Apr 1893 Baptism Place: Manchester, Manchester, England Church: Central Hall (Oldham Street Wesleyan Methodist) Father Name: John Whitley Mother Name: Mary Whitley
this is the baptism for the one I think you found, father George, mother sarah
Manchester, England, Births and Baptisms, 1813-1915 about Florence Mary Whiteley
Name: Florence Mary Whiteley [Florence May Whiteley] Birth Date: 30 Apr 1892 Age: 1 Baptism Date: 19 Jul 1893 Parish: Newton Heath, St Augustine Parish as it Appears: S Angustine, Newton Heath Father's Name: George Whiteley Mother's name: Sarah Whiteley Reference Number: M140/4/3/2 Item Number: 3 Archive Roll: 828
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2014 07:28 |
???????????
mother wrong name, but father is a Gardener
1901 Census
Name: Florence Whitley Age: 8 Estimated birth year: abt 1893 Relation to Head: Daughter Gender: Female Father: George Whitley Mother: Fannie Whitley Birth Place: Manchester, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: South Manchester Ecclesiastical parish: St Stephen County/Island: Lancashire Country: England
Registration district: Chorlton Sub-registration district: Chorlton upon Medlock ED, institution, or vessel: 30
George Whitley 37 b.ca 1864, Peterborough, Northamptonshire, Gardener Fannie Whitley 26 b.ca 1875, Bruikill, Lincolnshire Florence Whitley 8
Address:- 23 Elton Street
|
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link!
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2014 07:43 |
What was your grandfather's name? Not seeing a birth that fits in 1918.
Do you have the first marriage cert? The address and witnesses might prove helpful in finding her in 1911.
Rose
|
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link!
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2014 08:13 |
So they only thing that doesn't fit is that George is listed as her father on her 2nd marriage.
The one that was a street away in 1911 was from Manchester. She is listed with John and Mary in 1901.
Might be worth getting that 1st marriage certificate.
Rose
|
|
Chris Ho :)
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2014 08:23 |
http://twgpp.org/information.php?id=3277760
http://www.naval-history.net/xDKCas1915-02Feb.htm
WW1 Naval Casualties Transcription (Find My Past) First name(s) William Last name Armin Birth year 1892 Birth day 24 Birth month May Birth town Durham Birth county County Durham Death year 1915 Death date 03/02/1915 Service number J.4036. (Ch) (J4936) Rating Ldg Smn Service R.N. Ship/unit Hms Clan Mcnaughton Cause of death Killed or died by means other than disease, accident or enemy action Cemetery Body not recovered for burial Location of grave Not recorded Relatives notified Wife:- Florence M. 64 Morant Street Poplar E.
(relating to William/Navy)
Chris :)
|
|
Jacqueline
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2014 08:47 |
These are the only Lampey births in Grimsby
Births Dec 1919 (>99%) Lampey William C Whiteley Grimsby 7a 1085 Scan available - click to view Births Mar 1922 (>99%) Lampey Dorothy L Whiteley Grimsby 7a 1114
Note that the boy was born one year later than your message says
This is the West Ham marriage
Marriages Dec 1918 (>99%) Armin Florence M Lampay W.Ham 4a 797 Scan available - click to view
Lampey Walter Armin W.Ham 4a 797
|
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link!
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2014 10:21 |
William died:
Deaths Sep 1920 (>99%) LAMPEY William C 1 Grimsby 7a 603
Here he is:
Births Sep 1918 Armin Walter Lampey Whitley Grimsby 7a 940
Rose
|
|
Kayak
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2014 11:31 |
THE MARRIAGE YOU FOUND WAS 1889 NOT 1891
Surname First name(s) District Vol Page Marriages Sep 1889 (>99%) Barlow William Bury 8c 630 PAYNE Sarah Ann Bury 8c 630 ,,<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< SIMPSON Martha Bury 8c 630 Whiteley George Bury 8c 630 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2014 11:47 |
BUT - on 'that' marriage Sarah PAYNE actually married William BARLOW !!
Lancs BMD 1889 : PAYNE Sarah Ann BARLOW William Bury, St.Thomas Bury CE10/1/372
Dea x
|
|
ChristinaS
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2014 12:19 |
Maybe Walter Lampey couldn't marry Florence before December 1918 because he was away at sea till then.
The 1911 census for Florrie the servant could be the correct one, as the Florence with parents with John and Mary is with her parents on the 1911 census.
The 1901 census posted above by SylviainCanada looks promising.
The father, George Whiteley a gardener, didn't marry Fanny (Watson) until 1901. He married as a widower (certificate is on Ancestry)
George's full name was George Friend Whiteley. I can't see any marriage for him before 1901, so perhaps he considered Sarah to be his wife, although they hadn't actually married.
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2014 12:38 |
Link to the marriage cert:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-267-12375-26014-38?cc=1788853&wc=M6FC-NT5:143838901,149318401,149366501
Dea x
|
|
Choccy
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2014 14:16 |
1911 England, Wales & Scotland Census
64 Rutland St Grimsby, Clee, Lincolnshire, England
Annie Rowston Wife Widow Female 52 1859 - Retford Benjamin Arnold Rowston Son Single Male 21 1890 Engine Cleaner Cleethorpes
William Rowston Son Single Male 17 1894 Box Maker Cleethorpes
Tom Rowston Son Single Male 15 1896 Errand Boy Cleethorpes
>>>>>>Fanny Whiteley Visitor Married Female 38 1873 - Marchapple
>>>>>>George Watson Whiteley Son Single Male 9 1902 - Manchester
>>>>>>Constance Ameila Whiteley Daughter - Female 0 1911 - Grimsby
|
|
ChristinaS
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2014 15:22 |
Pity Fanny wasn't with her husband. I can't find him anywhere. Can anyone else?
|
|
ChristinaS
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2014 16:02 |
64, Rutland Street (1911 above) touches onto Hildyard Street, where Florence is in 1911. So they definitely seem to be the correct family.
Only problem is that this Florence was born in 1892 but the poster's Florence was born in 1893.
|
|
Clarky123
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2014 16:05 |
Hi everyone and thanks for all your help so far- can't believe how quickly you all replied!! I was in work and desperate to answer some of the questions flying back..
sylviaincanadas first post- I don't believe I've seen that entry before but its weird that a few of the entries i have seen state the birthday as 30 april .. i don't know if its just me getting obsessed or if someone else in the records mixed up a load of florence mays too!! just to keep me on my toes!
I also went right through the entry with George and Fanny- i believe george is listed as a widower when he married fanny and it was just before the census which means she can't be FMWs Mum but may have married her Dad.- and i concocted all kinds of theories that FMWs Mum had died when she was young and her father married fanny who is originally from lincolshire which would explain the move- and they went on to have a boy i believe however there is no death of a sarah whiteley (or any female whiteley) if that second scenario (the george and sarah one) were true. in fact theres no marriage or death for a george whitely (whatever spelling). presuming in those days a couple married a few years before their first child there are no marriages around 1890-1893 for george. there are no deaths of a george whitely between FMW birth in 1893 and marriage in 1918 (the wedding cert i have shows that her father was deceased by this time)
I actually have the birth cert for the one you listed - the john and mary but discarded it. john was a horse keeper!? not sure...
Rose- thanks so much- i think i will have to get the first marriage cert eventually, my grandfather was her second child he to add to the confusion was given her first husbands surname for some reason though he can't possibly be his (he died in 1915 and my Gf was born in 1918.. he is walter lampey armin as you later found!!
rose - what did you mean by this 'The one that was a street away in 1911 was from Manchester. She is listed with John and Mary in 1901'? how did you know she belonged to john and mary?
Chris Ho- thanks for the info on william Armin
Jacqueline- which site do you use - i noticed it has scans available?
Jacqueline and Rose- that entry for william C- appears to be a child they had after my Gf who died before y great aunty Dorothy.
Chris- thanks so much for some reason i wrote 1891 on my fam tree... but Dea... oh no you just put an end to that theory ... arrgh so now i don't even know who he married pre FMWs birth
christinaS- I'm starting to think you're all correct- the George and Fannie option is looking more likely- shame i deleted all my research from my tree when someone i paid told me it wasn't her... though i guess Fannie would be a step Mum and im still no further forward with FMW real mum and lineage. I have previously had G friend whitely in my tree.. and hoped he'd be easier to find but that unusual middle name doesn't feature again. was it usual not to marry in those days?
Choccy- yes thats the wife and son i thought George may have gone on to have- had all of that in my tree and then deleted it.. typical isn't it
|
|
Clarky123
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2014 16:07 |
Christina- would it be feasible that the marriage cert and death cert are incorrect isn't there usually some leeway of a year or two?
|
|
Clarky123
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2014 16:13 |
choccy- very good.. i didn't ever see the constance amelia entry- where'd you find that?
|
|
Clarky123
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2014 16:41 |
Christina- you're good.. i hadn't noticed before that rultland crosses hildyard- thats way too much of a coincidence- that she was visiting someone that close to FMW!
|
|
Clarky123
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2014 16:43 |
Dea - does that therefore mean where did choccy find this?
urname First name(s) District Vol Page Marriages Sep 1889 (>99%) Barlow William Bury 8c 630 PAYNE Sarah Ann Bury 8c 630 SIMPSON Martha Bury 8c 630 Whiteley George Bury 8c 630
if sarah married william barlow- that george married martha simpson??????????????
|