Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
taylor family
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
tia | Report | 12 Jul 2013 22:05 |
i do not know the answer to that question the information my nana sent my was |
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 12 Jul 2013 21:57 |
Just another thought if his father was Francis who died in 1913(possible death /will index info) then why would they record father as Frank in 1917 when Walter died |
|||
|
tia | Report | 12 Jul 2013 21:52 |
i think i know what you mean it a little confusing but i know i need Walters birth cert to find out his birth mother thank you very much for the information i have written it down just in case it reliant |
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 12 Jul 2013 21:48 |
Hi was just posting as I think the thought was that Francis may have been Frank with Martha in a 1901 census but as we see there was a Frank/Martha and Francis /Elizabeth in both 1891 and 1901 so 2 different families. |
|||
|
tia | Report | 12 Jul 2013 21:34 |
i know said this before but no Walter on this record either or am i reading wrong again it takes me a while to understand the records |
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 12 Jul 2013 21:29 |
1891 possible Frank and Martha |
|||
|
tia | Report | 12 Jul 2013 21:23 |
oh ok i miss read it i need to put my glasses on. |
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 12 Jul 2013 21:21 |
1901 Walter is not with them I have posted a possible 1901 census above he is a servant living in Yorkshire this of course may not be him as the year of birth is a couple of years out. Will look for other Walters |
|||
|
tia | Report | 12 Jul 2013 21:18 |
there is no walter taylor as there chid so i dont think this would be the right info |
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 12 Jul 2013 21:15 |
1901 |
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 12 Jul 2013 21:10 |
1901 |
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 12 Jul 2013 20:55 |
possible will index |
|||
|
tia | Report | 12 Jul 2013 20:54 |
ok i would like to thank you both for helping me and i will take down the information you have given me and ask my nana about it all thank you both very much for the information |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 12 Jul 2013 20:51 |
The info posted is for you to check. |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 12 Jul 2013 20:45 |
1851 |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 12 Jul 2013 20:44 |
I'm not happy with it to be honest. The 1891 census doesn't include Walter either. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
tia | Report | 12 Jul 2013 20:42 |
i can not see that they have got a son called walter so would this be the right people? |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 12 Jul 2013 20:39 |
There's this Frank Taylor with a Martha in 1901?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
tia | Report | 12 Jul 2013 20:38 |
i believe this is the information i was looking for although the information i have was that francis taylor was married to a martha but this is the same information that i kept getting and i couldnt find a martha that was married to a francis taylor |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 12 Jul 2013 20:35 |
1891 |