Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
possible census look ups please
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 24 Feb 2013 12:51 |
Another baptism: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 24 Feb 2013 12:54 |
London, England, Births and Baptisms, 1813-1906 |
|||
Marked as Answered | |||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 24 Feb 2013 12:57 |
This one wasn't on your list: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 24 Feb 2013 13:00 |
London, England, Births and Baptisms, 1813-1906 |
|||
|
PricklyHolly | Report | 24 Feb 2013 13:00 |
London, England, Marriages and Banns, 1754-1921 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 24 Feb 2013 13:02 |
London, England, Births and Baptisms, 1813-1906 |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 24 Feb 2013 13:05 |
Mary Ann's baptism - there is another one in 1830 but Charles on this is a Watch maker: |
|||
|
David | Report | 24 Feb 2013 13:22 |
potty is it poss for you to trace charles tisdales c 1798 marr i have him married to mary ann but no maiden name for her i believed they married around 1820 / 1822 |
|||
|
David | Report | 24 Feb 2013 13:41 |
do you think susannah evans that marr charles william petchey is my susan evans ??? i do |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 24 Feb 2013 13:57 |
David, on the original image of that marriage for Susannah the address for both bride and groom was 29 Morgan Street. |
|||
|
David | Report | 24 Feb 2013 14:07 |
thank you |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 24 Feb 2013 14:20 |
David, re your PM , I wouldn't worry too much about Susan/ah's name being different on the census and on the baptism/marriage records. She was probably named Susanah at birth but always called Susan by the family. This looks like her birth reg: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 24 Feb 2013 14:23 |
Quite agree Potty, and the baptism I posted clearly shows her as Susannah. The children's middle names (as shown on baptisms) weren't recorded on the 1871 so they obviously just listed them as they referred to them. |
|||
|
David | Report | 24 Feb 2013 14:57 |
thank you both |