Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

tracing dependants of beatrice raisborough 1898

Page 2 + 1 of 3

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Unknown

Unknown Report 18 Feb 2013 07:45

hi kathleen bell yes u have correct family there, as grandad was disowned by family only basing info on others family trees from there, he never talked about his family in any way nor did my nan his children knew very little either however when my nan n grandad married they moved into his parents house for a while and that was definetly in northampton , as is on my nan n grandads birth certificate. as far as i know they never lived in london from research married a george stacey 1917, kids??? was only told by aunt she was told by her dad he had 6 siblings however guess this is always the problem when so little is known <3

Unknown

Unknown Report 18 Feb 2013 07:45

hi kathleen bell yes u have correct family there, as grandad was disowned by family only basing info on others family trees from there, he never talked about his family in any way nor did my nan his children knew very little either however when my nan n grandad married they moved into his parents house for a while and that was definetly in northampton , as is on my nan n grandads birth certificate. as far as i know they never lived in london from research married a george stacey 1917, kids??? was only told by aunt she was told by her dad he had 6 siblings however guess this is always the problem when so little is known <3

ErikaH

ErikaH Report 18 Feb 2013 09:24

So, no thanks to anyone for the help provided...........

And if you refuse to believe the printed evidence, you are never going to make any headway

There is not much point in asking for help, if you are going to dismiss out of hand the info provided

And NEVER rely on anyone else's tree(s)..............their 'research' could be flawed

Trailertrash

Yes, we're 'done' on here.........or at least I am!

trailertrash

trailertrash Report 18 Feb 2013 09:56

Hi Reggie,

I'm done too!!!

Unknown

Unknown Report 18 Feb 2013 10:58

hi all i do appreciate all the help given and am sorry if i led anyone to believe anything other i am looking into all the info so kindly provided by yourselves and hoping to link it all up soon, definetly wouldnt dismiss any links or possibilities out of hand as everything is very much a possibility when one knows so little of there family history have gathered family trees can be flawed being so knew to this is a bit of a minefield im sorry if any offence was caused as none was ever meant regards

KathleenBell

KathleenBell Report 18 Feb 2013 13:52

I think you need to buy at least one of the birth certificates for the possible half-siblings of Kitchener Raisborough (one of the London births) just to find out if the mother's name is the same as Kitchener's mother's name.

As said before, at that time during and after the war people did move around more than you would imagine. They may not have been in London for long. I'd be very surprised if these births were NOT half siblings of Kitchener.

Kath. x