Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
JannieAnnie
|
Report
|
18 Jul 2012 13:46 |
Hi Everyone - just tying up loose ends before I mark this post as (exceptionally well) answered.
Such a lot of information to sort / file yesterday thanks to everyone’s hard work on my behalf.
Chris – I realised I did not respond to your question at 17:00 yesterday regarding the witnesses on the 1904 marriage – they were George Bister (lived at Reeves Road) and Elizabeth Jane Corderay or Cordery or Corderey (unable to find anything on her so far). I did find George Bister on a tree on GR a while back, sent a PM, but no response. The only other connection (so far) is he lived on Reeves Road. I have a question – I’ve noticed a couple of times that other GR members seem able to view details on Marriages which include the witnesses – you mentioned the image wasn’t clear yesterday for the witnesses on the1904 marriage – is it possible to view marriage certificate images online – I have FMP, but don’t think I can do it there - am I missing a source somewhere?
ChristineS - I found the 2nd marriage for William John Thomson to Isabella (Watson) in 1878 but couldn’t find the first marriage you mentioned yesterday in your post at 20:09? I did find that there were 3 children from his 2nd marriage to Isabella, one child died (1881-1883) and so did Isabella, his wife, in 1896. If you remember the name of the first marriage partner could you let me know please? The youngest child a girl, also Isabella, I have found through to 1911 (with the Watsons and then with her father), so all tidy there.
One final question – how obsessed should I be with my family history research? Oops – can answer that – too late – I am very obsessed!
Janet
|
|
ChristinaS
|
Report
|
18 Jul 2012 14:06 |
Hi Janet,
William's first marriage was in 1872 to Theresa Page. Ancestry has a lot of marriages on London Marriages and Banns. You can see the original records. So you can save yourself a fortune on certificates by looking there first. Also, the certificates are copies of the originals, unlike the ones you order from the GRO, which are sometimes mistranscribed.
I think I speak for many of the helpers on this site, when I say we started out with tracing our family trees as a hobby, which turned into an obsession. So much so, that when we come to a standstill with our own trees, we turn to helping others with theirs. It's also satisfying to help out.
|
|
Chris Ho :)
|
Report
|
18 Jul 2012 14:24 |
London, England, Births and Baptisms, 1813-1906 London, England, Marriages and Banns, 1754-1921 London, England, Deaths and Burials, 1813-1980 London, England, Baptisms, Marriages and Burials, 1538-1812
(just adding the above Janet, but not all Parishes are covered!. FMP has some Baptisms too, from Docklands Ancestors)
At least the witnesses weren't Smiths, lol, must be something on them about!.
Chris :)
|
|
JannieAnnie
|
Report
|
18 Jul 2012 14:42 |
Hi ChristinaS and Chris
Thank you again for the above - and the info on what Ancestry has - will have a look and think about subscribing - know they do a 'free 14 days trial', so might give it a go.
Thanks all
Janet
PS Just to let you know I will be tracking down some Smiths in the not too distant future - hope to meet you again on that thread!
|
|
JannieAnnie
|
Report
|
18 Jul 2012 14:42 |
Exceptionally well answered
Happy JannieAnnie
|
|
AnnCardiff
|
Report
|
31 Aug 2012 15:43 |
:-) :-) :-) :-)
|
|
JannieAnnie
|
Report
|
31 Aug 2012 15:46 |
Suggested that I put this on here as they are the same family:
Afternoon everyone
Does anyone have any suggestions on which way to go please?
Here is the (next) problem:
I am going backwards with Smiths (and those who married them). I have the birth certificate of Robert William Smith (1870) and his wife Eliza (nee Steele) and know about the children which are on this thread:
http://www.genesreunited.co.uk/boards/board/ancestors/thread/1304044
but I am now chasing after his mother! Jane McKenzie Nelson. So .....
I have got the birth certificate of Robert William Smith born 1870 - his father is shown as William Smith (but could be Robert William as shown on Robert 1870's marriage cert!!) Occupation: Marine and his mother is "Jane SMITH formerly McKENZIE NELSON".
According to the Census records, Jane (McKenzie Nelson) Smith was born in Glasgow in 1831/1832, had 3 sons Henry (1865), Robert William (1870) and Reuben (1873) and on the 1881 Census she was with them and her husband William (1830).
So is this their marriage? -
Civil registration event: Marriage
Name: SMITH, William Registration district: [?] Wandsworth County: London Year of registration: 1865 Quarter of registration: Oct-Nov-Dec Volume no: [?] 1D Page no: [?] 976 William Smith married one of the following people
MCKENZIE, Jane WHYMARK, Caroline
COTTERELL, George
If it is - where does the Nelson come into it? OR was she married before to someone called Nelson? So far I have been unable to find a McKenzie / Nelson marriage.
I have also (sort of) discounted that the McKenzie was a middle name – as if the marriage posted is correct it was used as her surname.
There are other strange things – she is on the 1871, 1881, 1891 (widow) but with her brother in law – William Smith aged 70 (born 1821). I cannot find her on the 1901 which might be explained by this death:
Name:SMITH, Jane Registration district: [?]Whitechapel County:London Year of registration:1901 Quarter of registration:Jan-Feb-Mar Age at death:70 Volume no:1C Page no:178
So any suggestions re any other marriages, census appearances – anything before I take the plunge and put the Wandsworth marriage cert on my list of 'must haves'?
Thank you
|
|
ChristinaS
|
Report
|
31 Aug 2012 18:47 |
Here are the details of the Wandsworth marriage. William Smith is a widower, and Jane is a widow.
William is a labourer.
Mmm - not looking great is it.
Name: William Smith Age: 46 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1819 Spouse Name: Jane Mc Kenzie Spouse Age: 39 Record Type: Marriage Event Date: 5 Nov 1865 Parish: Wandsworth All Saints Borough: Wandsworth Father Name: Thomas Smith Spouse Father Name: Joseph Bearman Register Type: Parish Register
|
|
ChristinaS
|
Report
|
31 Aug 2012 19:28 |
This looks to be your Robert William's baptism.
His father is still using the name William, but it must surely have been Robert William really, as he appears to have had a brother named William. (according to the 1891 census you found for Jane living with her brother-in-law).
Name: Robert William Smith Record Type: Baptism Estimated Birth Date: abt 1870 Baptism Date: 19 May 1870 Father's Name: William Robert Smith Mother's Name: Jane Smith Parish or Poor Law Union: Limehouse St Anne Borough: Tower Hamlets Register Type: Parish Registers
If you started a new thread I'm sure you'd get more helpers. Trouble is I think there's a rule that you can't have more than one thread on the same family.
It doesn't make sense in this case as the families don't overlap. Wouldn't want you to get into trouble though. And there's sure to be someone who will jump up to complain.
|
|
JannieAnnie
|
Report
|
31 Aug 2012 20:06 |
Hi ChristinaS
Thanks for your interest in my ongoing thread.
It is very helpful to see that William (or whatever) and Jane were married before - I thought it was a bit late for them to be getting married for the first time, but didn't want to be judgmental.... I did find a family - with a Jane (Nelson) and husband and children but discounted them - might see if I can tie them in - must have had a reason to ignore them before.
I did wonder about William Snr/the brother-in-law - and on the baptism it shows William Robert - but if he had an older brother also named William that seems very strange - it just occurred to me that maybe on the Census it was really him - but why would they lie? Or maybe a half-brother? Or he had a sister who married another William Smith!! Who knows!
It did seem logical to me to put it on a separate thread as I was going backwards in time looking for McKenzies and it seems Nelsons, and I put in the link so that helpers wouldn't waste time posting the going forward information - and I didn't want to contravene any rules. I suppose technically any threads about my relatives should be on one - as after all they are ALL my ancestors
|
|
ChristinaS
|
Report
|
31 Aug 2012 20:17 |
I'm not really happy about the 1865 marriage.
Wouldn't Jane's surname be Nelson, not McKenzie? And this one has a father with the surname Bearman.
Also, it has William as a labourer.
Haven't been able to find anything better though.
|
|
JannieAnnie
|
Report
|
31 Aug 2012 20:37 |
I know - that is why I posted the marriage and thought I would see if anyone else could see something I couldn't. I tried Robert /William / Smith/ McKenzie /Nelson combinations - came up with nothing more.
As far as I can see there isn't a pre-existing connection with Wandsworth, William (1830) was born in Woolwich it seems - and I have found two possible births - one called William and one called Robert. There was a connection in the Steele/Thompson lot on the death of a small Reuben with Woolwich, maybe Wandsworth was Jane's connection.
I would have thought that somehow Jane might have been recorded with both McKenzie and Nelson - and the Bearman does throw me a bit too.
William's job doesn't worry me - perhaps he married her as she was expecting, then regretted it and ran away to sea!
|
|
Mary
|
Report
|
31 Aug 2012 21:30 |
I don't think that marriage is correct as the birth cert for Robert William Smith 1870 would say mum Jane nee Bearman.
Maryb.
|
|
JannieAnnie
|
Report
|
31 Aug 2012 21:39 |
So maybe I am looking for a Smith/ Jane Nelson marriage (not apparent that there is one) and maybe the McKenzie is her middle name and Nelson the surname - but then surely the birth cert would just say formerly Nelson rather than McKenzie Nelson.
|
|
Mary
|
Report
|
31 Aug 2012 22:06 |
?? Jane Mckenzie married Robert Smith 9/2/1866 in Calton Glasgow Lanark Scotland.Info of Family search site(LDS)
Maryb.
|
|
JannieAnnie
|
Report
|
31 Aug 2012 22:33 |
Mmm that is interesting, and possible, - but the first child of the marriage Henry George was born in Limehouse, Middlesex 1865/1866, so is it feasible? If so, why McKenzie Nelson on the birth cert?
|
|
Potty
|
Report
|
1 Sep 2012 13:18 |
Just for info:
1881 England Census about Henry Smith Name: Henry Smith Age: 16 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1865 Relation: Son Father's Name: William Smith Mother's Name: Jane Smith Gender: Male Where born: Limehouse, Middlesex, England Civil parish: Poplar County/Island: London Country: England Street Address: 53 Market Street Education:
Employment status: View image Occupation: Laborer Registration district: Poplar Sub-registration district: Poplar ED, institution, or vessel: 8 Neighbors: View others on page Piece: 506 Folio: 47 Page Number: 17 Household Members: Name Age William Smith 51 mariner Jane Smith 49 b Glasgow, Tailoress Henry Smith 16 b Limehouse Robert Smith 11 b Limehouse Reuben Smith b Poplar
Henry's birth:
Births Mar 1865 Smith Henry George Stepney 1c 520
Jane's age doesn't tie up with the marriage in 1865.
|
|
JannieAnnie
|
Report
|
1 Sep 2012 21:41 |
Hi Potty
Thanks for posting the 1881. You are right - Jane's age at marriage does not tie up with the 1881- I hadn't checked that before and I have just got out my calculator (but still make it the same) also William's age does not tie up with the 1881 and the age gap does not agree when comparing their ages with the marriage and the 1881. Plus the Wandsworth William's age is more like the brother-in-law William's age. All very fishy.
So I have to conclude that the Wandsworth marriage is not the one for me - ChristinaS, Mary and you are all in agreement that it it doesn't 'fit' and for different reasons. At least I am sure of that now - but need to try to think about how else I can track her down - perhaps they didn't marry at all.
|
|
Potty
|
Report
|
2 Sep 2012 11:39 |
Jane in 1871 - there is quite a age gap between Henry and Robert. Possibly it was a second marriage for Henry:
1871 England Census about Henry Smith Name: Henry Smith Age: 6 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1865 Relation: Son Parent's Name: Jane Smith - married, laundress, b Glasgow Gender: Male Where born: Limehouse Civil parish: Poplar All Saints Ecclesiastical parish: All Saints County/Island: London Country: England Registration district: Poplar Sub-registration district: Poplar ED, institution, or vessel: 11 Household schedule number: 164 Piece: 582 Folio: 51 Page Number: 29 Household Members: Name Age Jane Smith 40 Henry Smith 6 Robert Smith 1
|
|
JannieAnnie
|
Report
|
2 Sep 2012 22:59 |
Yes, I think that it was quite likely a second marriage - for both William and Jane, as they were a bit older than I expected for a first marriage, which is why I had high hopes of the Wandsworth marriage (widower and widow), but I think I need to go back to William (1830) born in Woolwich and see if I can find anything more on him - but Smith is an awkward name to research - especially as they have frequently used first names!
William (1830) missing in 1871 - maybe a sea, perhaps that is why there was a 5/6 year gap between Henry and William (1870)
So far can only find an potentially appropriate Robert, but not a Woolwich William
Surname:Smith Forenames:Robert Baptism Year:1830 Baptism Month:FEB Baptism Day:21 Mother:Ann Father:William Birth Year: Birth Month: Birth Day: Place: Woolwich County:Kent Source:St.Mary Magdalen Woolwich 1813-1837 baptisms
As I have nothing / nobody else to attach him to then it is all guesswork - and too many Smiths by far
|