Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Eleanor Priaulx & John Penfold married 1855
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Linda | Report | 11 Mar 2012 14:09 |
Did you notice that on the 1851 census Ellenor Blunden and her children are sharing the house with Mary Wood, widow, 47, shoe binding, born Lewes, and her son Alfred 20, shoemaker journeyman, born Brighton? I wonder if this is the connection with John Penfold same trade. In 1841 at Richmond Square, Brighton are Henry Bartlet 70, tailor, Mary Wood 37, Elenor 15, Sarah 12 and Alfred 10. So Ellener and her mother were both widowed very young. |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 11 Mar 2012 14:11 |
Forgot to say that of course this fits in with the Steyning marriage of James Blunden and Eleanor Wood. Wonder why they got married in Steyning? |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 11 Mar 2012 16:51 |
And the 1850 death has to be the right James Blunden - he can't have got married in 1848 if he died in 1847! So James junior is his son, not John Penfold's. It's all falling into place! :-) |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 11 Mar 2012 18:12 |
Linda |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 11 Mar 2012 20:43 |
Wow, you have been working hard while I've been asleep. |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 11 Mar 2012 23:02 |
Sylvia, thanks for that extra information - I didn't know that about presumed fathers. I'll see what certificates I can order. Once I've got them |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 11 Mar 2012 23:12 |
I'm assuming btw that Henry Bartlet, 70, in 1841 is probably Mary Wood's father. Can't find him in 1851 so I assume he died, which is a shame as I wanted to find his birthplace! FreeBMD gives a death of Henry Bartlett in Brighton in the March quarter 1851 so that's probably him. It also has death of an Ann Catherine Bartlett in Brighton in Sept quarter 1838 - wonder if she could be his wife? |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 11 Mar 2012 23:59 |
Ozi |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 12 Mar 2012 00:09 |
Just to help me get my head into this part of the family .................... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 12 Mar 2012 00:12 |
One possible death for Henry Bartlet(t) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 12 Mar 2012 00:18 |
Yes, great find. |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 12 Mar 2012 00:19 |
1851 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 12 Mar 2012 00:31 |
There are these: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 12 Mar 2012 00:59 |
I'm not getting anywhere. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 12 Mar 2012 01:50 |
Thank you! I'm off to bed now! Back tomorrow. |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 12 Mar 2012 15:25 |
I put in a request to the Sussex FHG marriage list and they came up with a marriage between Mary Bartlett and John Wood in Hove 19 Dec 1825. John Wood was buried at St Thomas's, Lewes 9 Jan 1833 aged 29. It all fits nicely - the youngest of their 3 children, Alfred, was born c1831 in Lewes. And it means that my assumtpion that Henry Bartlett was Mary's father is correct. Yay! :-) |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 12 Mar 2012 20:15 |
Great news, Linda. |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 13 Mar 2012 03:27 |
great news Linda. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 13 Mar 2012 03:36 |
This is the only marriage for a Henry Bartlett that shows up on familysearch.org/ |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 13 Mar 2012 04:41 |
Yes Sylvia, that's the one I found on 12 Mar 2012 00:18. It doesn't prove Henry is her father. He could've been an uncle or cousin. Linda needs to find some more proof. |