Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1851 and 1871 census help please
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
supercrutch | Report | 20 Jul 2011 22:53 |
I have been looking for: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Janice | Report | 20 Jul 2011 22:57 |
1871 - I put a transcription error message on Ancestry |
|||
|
supercrutch | Report | 20 Jul 2011 23:06 |
Oh brilliant, thank you Janice, that's a great help. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Janice | Report | 20 Jul 2011 23:08 |
I found James Bird Bush (wonderful name!!) in 1851 but Charlotte isn't with him. |
|||
|
supercrutch | Report | 20 Jul 2011 23:16 |
Yes it's a great name...lol |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Janice | Report | 20 Jul 2011 23:24 |
1861 for reference |
|||
|
supercrutch | Report | 20 Jul 2011 23:29 |
Strange isn't it? I wonder if she left the family home because of the birth of first child out of wedlock. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Joy | Report | 20 Jul 2011 23:31 |
Frustrating! I can see various census and her baptism, and death registration, but cannot see her in 1851 :-( |
|||
|
supercrutch | Report | 20 Jul 2011 23:39 |
Because she gave her son the middle name Moore I did wonder if he was the Father and was perhaps using that name. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Janice | Report | 20 Jul 2011 23:43 |
I had that thought too but there's nothing showing - I even did a search with no surname! |
|||
|
chrissiex | Report | 20 Jul 2011 23:56 |
don't suppose there is any reason that Edwin would be called Thomas in 1851 ?? do you know who this Thomas is ? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
supercrutch | Report | 21 Jul 2011 00:04 |
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Janice | Report | 21 Jul 2011 00:06 |
If that is Edwin, it doesn't explain where Charlotte and Emma are. |
|||
|
Janice | Report | 21 Jul 2011 00:10 |
Well here's an interesting spanner in the works! Who is this? |
|||
|
chrissiex | Report | 21 Jul 2011 00:10 |
no ... but if Emma had a different papa Charlotte could have been somewhere with him and Emma :-) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
supercrutch | Report | 21 Jul 2011 00:14 |
Well the Edwin part fits, date pretty good. Is it a name change from Edwin Moore to Thomas Edwin? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Janice | Report | 21 Jul 2011 00:15 |
OK folks. Here he is in 1901 |
|||
|
Janice | Report | 21 Jul 2011 00:18 |
and in 1911 |
|||
|
supercrutch | Report | 21 Jul 2011 00:23 |
Now if we can find Thomas and Sarah's marriage and there is no named Father it might be conclusive :-D |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
chrissiex | Report | 21 Jul 2011 00:25 |
oh my goodness ! I was delayed a bit from posting that last and then looking for him further ... just had a message from a friend in Australia that his nan died this morning ( tonight ) ... so your events overtook me :-) |
|||
Researching: |