Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Birth Look Up Please
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 11 Mar 2011 01:19 |
You don't want to be sending me PMs ... makes me irritable. ;) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Nannylicious | Report | 11 Mar 2011 00:58 |
I too have found discrepancies with the spelling of Nixon (a common surname) e.g.Nixen. It makes life difficult but oh so rewarding when you find someone. |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 11 Mar 2011 00:53 |
I should have mentioned they're all unrelated boarders except for Anton and Emily, who I assumed was Ethel's grandmother. ;) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Nannylicious | Report | 11 Mar 2011 00:50 |
JaneyCanuck, This is interesting. Emily Nixon b.1833 was Ethel Lingwood's grandmother. I don't recognise any of the other names but I will certainly investigate Anton Prince. Emily had Susan (Ethel's mother), Sarah J. (who never married) and another daughter called Elizabeth who was a general servant living away from home in 1881 (aged 20). Perhaps she is the daughter who married Herr Prince. I will certainly investigate that line of enquiry. Thank you. |
|||
|
Nannylicious | Report | 11 Mar 2011 00:36 |
I have found them in 1901 thank you, living in Edmonton. Unfortunately, there are a couple of transcription errors but I have cross referenced all the names listed and other information that I have confirms the correct address for the family. One of the errors is that Charles Henry's wife was Susan and not Sarah as transcribed. |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 11 Mar 2011 00:32 |
Well fine, Mike. ;) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 11 Mar 2011 00:24 |
Still need to find the family in 1901 |
|||
|
Nannylicious | Report | 11 Mar 2011 00:13 |
Oooer! Now you're getting scary. I didn't mean to start a cyber war of words over my request. |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 9 Mar 2011 22:12 |
To Bruce: if you have something to say to me, perhaps you would send me a PM. I don't really give a flying * how things "seem" to you, whoever you might be (I don't recall seeing you helping on anything in nearly four years on these boards, while Mike, Jax and I and the rest work together daily, including on this thread that you seem to have made no contribution to). I strongly suggest that you refrain from this kind of negative personal commentary about other members, and I recommend that you delete that post or edit it to remove that commentary, or I shall ask that it be done for you. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 9 Mar 2011 21:33 |
The best ones are conversations, for sure. And most of us have suspicious minds after so much of this -- children born to unmarried parents (I lose track of them in my tree, although my own direct ancestors seem to have waited for the marriage to be born), people with fake names for a variety of reasons (I have two of them just in my own recent tree, my dad's father and my mother's grandfather) -- that we know just where to start looking, and what for. ;) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Nannylicious | Report | 9 Mar 2011 21:19 |
Thanks to you too JaneyCanuck. I realise now that there was a "conversation" going on between you and the other contributors. I certainly didn't intend to leave you out of the thank you acknowledgements and hope I didn't cause offence. |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 9 Mar 2011 01:19 |
It's called teamwork, Pamela .................... you didn't give us the necessary information about the parents' marriage, so I went and found it ...................... Mike matched a birth to that information before I had a chance to come at it from the other end and search for an Ethel Violet birth that matched up with one of the possible brides .................. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Nannylicious | Report | 9 Mar 2011 01:11 |
Thank you so much Jax. This all ties up. Pam |
|||
|
jax | Report | 9 Mar 2011 00:40 |
1891 census - household transcription |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Nannylicious | Report | 9 Mar 2011 00:33 |
Jax |
|||
|
Lindsey* | Report | 9 Mar 2011 00:29 |
BTW there is a tree on ancestry with her photo plus more details. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Nannylicious | Report | 9 Mar 2011 00:24 |
Sorry Lindsey but you have the wrong family. Susan Nixon married Charles Henry Lingwood not Charles William. Thanks anyway |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 9 Mar 2011 00:22 |
You're welcome |
|||
|
Nannylicious | Report | 9 Mar 2011 00:19 |
Thanks everyone especially Mike who has hit the nail on the head! Her mother was Susan Nixon from Staines who married Charles Henry Lingwood in December 1885. I presume that as her surname is Nixon, the father's name wasn't stated on the birth certificate. Thanks again. |
|||
|
Lindsey* | Report | 9 Mar 2011 00:18 |
guess they had her baptised again |
|||
Researching: |