Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Alice Howard 1857 London
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Christine | Report | 20 Feb 2011 17:48 |
Ok.. I'm confused on Dist 14 on how you use that part, I think I'm going to give up on this, you all seem to be trying so hard and like you say she may not have been registered at birth though it does seem strange to not find her in census 1861 and 1871 at least with a father named thomas. |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 20 Feb 2011 17:37 |
It doesn't help that dispite the house numbers being clearly on the enumeration sheets FMP have missed them off Grrrr |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 20 Feb 2011 17:34 |
I know Tracey - that seems to happen to me all the time! |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 20 Feb 2011 17:33 |
I cannot find that address on the 1871 census, the numbers stop at 112 for Enumeration Dist 14.... Grrr |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 20 Feb 2011 17:28 |
Just as a daft fact - Alice's address was 113 Wellington Row when she married. It sold for £465k in 2007. |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 20 Feb 2011 17:16 |
The other Alice... |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 20 Feb 2011 17:16 |
Have just realised that on the marriage record she's described as "full age" meaning 21 or over. |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 20 Feb 2011 17:14 |
Possibly the second witness.... |
|||
|
Christine | Report | 20 Feb 2011 17:14 |
Oooo which 1871 census would that be. |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 20 Feb 2011 17:08 |
The only way it'll have his name wrong is either if the vicar had a fit of memory loss (has been known) or the father didn't exist :( |
|||
|
Christine | Report | 20 Feb 2011 17:06 |
I have found the thomas howard census 1861, 1871, and 1881, I am starting to think we may not find her, I don't really want to order a birthcertificate 1857 B/G just incase it's not her, do you think the marriage certificate may have her fathers name wrong. |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 20 Feb 2011 16:49 |
1861? |
|||
|
Christine | Report | 20 Feb 2011 16:46 |
I just went on ancestry site and looked up for her death after 1911 and not one came up for a Alice Craig, there was a few different surnames though. |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 20 Feb 2011 16:40 |
Possibly father Thomas in 1871? |
|||
|
Christine | Report | 20 Feb 2011 16:40 |
No I do not know when she died, I've found the Alice Howard 1857 B/G, they is also a Shoreditch one, |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 20 Feb 2011 16:34 |
Do you know when she died? |
|||
|
Christine | Report | 20 Feb 2011 16:33 |
I just looked on Genes Reunited but I have also looked on Ancestry and found a several births for a Alice Howard, some of the dates varied from 1855 to 1857 also diff areas in london middx. |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 20 Feb 2011 16:28 |
Christine, which site are you searching on? |
|||
|
Christine | Report | 20 Feb 2011 16:26 |
I must be doing something wrong, just looked up birth - for the years 1857 and 1859 bethnal green and just london and came up with nothing. |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 20 Feb 2011 16:24 |
Baptism of another child. |