Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Robert Arthur Skippon
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Andrea | Report | 16 Jan 2011 10:42 |
Wow! thanks for all that,so is Thomas and Sarah, Robert Arthur Skippons parents? Would they be my GGGrandparents? |
|||
|
mac | Report | 16 Jan 2011 10:47 |
Robert, mistranscribed on 1891 census with family: |
|||
|
Andrea | Report | 16 Jan 2011 10:48 |
Are Sarah and Thomas Skippon my GGGrandparents? |
|||
|
mac | Report | 16 Jan 2011 10:51 |
I would think so, it all fits. |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 16 Jan 2011 10:58 |
To sum up, I think the person with the Skippon/langham marriage has gone astray somewhere. Obviously a completely different person. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Andrea | Report | 16 Jan 2011 11:02 |
Thank you all very much, at least that clears things up and i know what direction im going in. |
|||
|
mac | Report | 16 Jan 2011 11:02 |
Can't see a marriage for the parents Sarah & Thomas - she may have been married before the stepson is Potter, but I can't see him on 1881 census or a birth for him in Wolverhampton. |
|||
|
Andrea | Report | 16 Jan 2011 11:25 |
Possibly born in Norfolk? they all seem to come from there! |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 16 Jan 2011 11:42 |
Thomas was born Norfolk! Sarah Wolverhampton though, so marriage likely to be there. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
mac | Report | 16 Jan 2011 12:03 |
Births Jun 1876 (>99%) |
|||
|
mac | Report | 16 Jan 2011 12:04 |
No, his is Thomas Potter on 1891, but William Potter in 1901! |
|||
|
mac | Report | 16 Jan 2011 12:10 |
This is pure speculation but: |
|||
|
mac | Report | 16 Jan 2011 12:11 |
Don't know what happened, but the birth I included for Sarah has not posted: |
|||
|
mac | Report | 16 Jan 2011 12:19 |
Think this is your family in 1881: |
|||
|
mac | Report | 16 Jan 2011 12:36 |
Can't see a death for Sarah's husband Henry Potter, nor can I find him on census. But that may explain why we can't find a marriage for Thomas to Sarah. |
|||
|
Andrea | Report | 16 Jan 2011 14:53 |
Just to get it straight in my head, Sarah poss my GGGrandmother was either watkiss or wathiss before she married Henry Potter. She had two children by Henry a william and Ellenor. She then is married to Thomas Sheppon ( do you think this is a written error as in 1911 sencus of robert and mary they are skippon) .There is no record of their marriage as yet. why do you think we cant find these marriages, do you think she never actually married Thomas? |
|||
|
mac | Report | 16 Jan 2011 15:20 |
Very possibly they were not married, if she was already married which is what it looks like. |
|||
|
mac | Report | 16 Jan 2011 15:40 |
I would think Sarah Watkiss is your gggrandmother, and William is the next generation up. |
|||
|
Andrea | Report | 16 Jan 2011 16:03 |
Thank you very very much, you have spent hours on this and i cant wait to tell my Dad. |
|||
|
mac | Report | 16 Jan 2011 16:17 |
And just think, you haven't even started on Mary Reynolds ancestry yet! |