Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Linda
|
Report
|
16 Dec 2010 02:22 |
I was thinking on the child Thomasina Goodall pyle 1907 Middlesbrough.
This is what I have;
Charles Tonkinson Pyle b1840 SUNDERLAND married Hannah Maria Goodall b1843 Scotland. they married 13 Jul 1862 NEW WORTLEY. LEEDS
They went on to have 8 girls including Thomasina 1874 and only one Boy called Charles Tonkinson Pyle who married Maryann Dodsworth in 1896 SUNDERLAND
kind regards Linda
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
16 Dec 2010 02:26 |
Check back to the end of p 1 -- I've been assembling info on Laura (not Louisa)!
(And I've added more -- remarriage and death.)
|
|
Linda
|
Report
|
16 Dec 2010 02:30 |
Girls are Frances ann 1863 Margaret Hannah 1865 winifred harriet 1867 Lillian 1870 Louisa 1872 Thomasina Goodall 1874 >>>>>>>>>>Charles T 1877 Ethel Maud 1881 Eva 1888
|
|
MaureeninNY
|
Report
|
16 Dec 2010 02:37 |
1911 census transcription details for: Spring Head Meltham RG14PN26206 RG78PN1515 RD495 SD2 ED5 SN291
Reg. District: Huddersfield Sub District: Honley Parish: Meltham Enum. District: 5 Address: Spring Head Meltham County: Yorkshire (West riding) Quite clearly Greenhough on image. GREENHALGH, William Head Married M 37 1874 Compositor In The Printing Trade Yorks Batley GREENHALGH, Laura Elizabeth Wife Married 15 years F 39 1872 Durham Sunderland GREENHALGH, Eda Daughter F 14 1897 Errand Girl At The Mill Yorks Leeds GREENHALGH, Ethel Daughter F 12 1899 School Part Time Spool Hand Tucketer Yorks Leeds GREENHALGH, Winnifred Cora Daughter F 8 1903 School Yorks Meltham
3 children = all living.
Maureen
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
16 Dec 2010 02:37 |
No, they aren't, Linda!
You're taking that from the 1881 census, apparently. See back on page 2. The two girls were LILIA JANE and LAURA ELIZABETH, and I've given their correct births.
And full names are good. That's why we have FreeBMD!
Births Mar 1877 PILE Charles Tonkinson Sunderland 10a 667
Marriages Sep 1896 Borrett William Sunderland 10a 825 Dodsworth Mary Ann Sunderland 10a 825 Jones Alice Jane Sunderland 10a 825 PYLE Charles Tonkinson Sunderland 10a 825
Births Sep 1897 Pyle Charles Tonkinson Sunderland 10a 629
Good chance Thomasina Jr is his it seems.
1911
PYLE CHARLES 1878 33 Sunderland Durham PYLE HARRY ANN 1878 33 [sic] PYLE CHARLES 1898 13 PYLE GLADYS EVA 1900 11 PYLE THOMAS 1902 9 PYLE HAROLD 1905 6 PYLE HENIA 1908 3 PYLE WINNIE 1910 1
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
16 Dec 2010 02:41 |
And now I'm zonked and starving and am going home to eat, watch Coronation Street, play with kittens and sleep. ;)
Linda -- I'd missed your note about the closure for Thomasina.
Yes -- but she did live a long life!
And it's still possible she was the mother of the other Thomasina.
That's one birth certificate I'd be interested in getting, if it were me. Not sure how close your connection with them is.
You can be surprised, though.
My famous (here at GR) gr-grf Ernest Augustus Hill who decided to be Ernest Augustus Monck emigrated temporarily to Australia in 1887. A few months later, a birth was registered in London: Erna Augusta Mouch. Then the child died in the next quarter as Erna Augusta Monch. Well, "Monch" nad "Mouch" are well-known mistranscriptions of Monck, among othes. So I was madly curious -- who had had this child named for my gr-grfather when he was in Australia? Had his sister, who had also changed her name to Monck before she married, and whom I'd lost sight of after 1883 (although her husband managed to go bankrupt and change his own name by 1891), possibly survived and had another child?? I sent off for the certificate, I waited 3 months (I'm in Canada, but 2 weeks is standard), I enquired, it had been lost in the mail, they sent it again ... and sure enough, she really was Erna Augusta Monch, daughter of European immigrants, nowt to do with my Ernest.
But that Thomasina, really, she's connected *somehow*!
|
|
jax
|
Report
|
16 Dec 2010 02:41 |
1911 census - household transcription Person: PYLE, Charles Address: 54 Northumberland St Sunderland
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PYLE, Charles Head Married M 33 1878 Window Cleaner Sunderland County Durham VIEW PYLE, Harry Ann Wife Married 15 years F 33 1878 Sunderland County Durham VIEW PYLE, Charles Son M 13 1898 Sunderland County Durham VIEW PYLE, Gladys Eva Daughter F 11 1900 Sunderland County Durham VIEW PYLE, Thomas Son M 9 1902 Sunderland County Durham VIEW PYLE, Harold Son M 6 1905 Sunderland County Durham VIEW PYLE, Henia Daughter F 3 1908 Sunderland County Durham VIEW PYLE, Winnie Daughter F 1 1910 Sunderland County Durham VIEW 6 children all living
|
|
Linda
|
Report
|
16 Dec 2010 02:51 |
Hello Jax I have all the info on 1911 census sent to me thanks. I checked the birth of Henia 1908 Sunderland and cannot find it I have never heard of that name.
Thank you Linda.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
16 Dec 2010 02:57 |
Look look!
Name: Thomasina Goodall Henry Birth Date: 7 Nov 1907 Death Registration Month/Year: Feb 2003 Age at death (estimated): 95 Registration district: Sunderland Inferred County: Durham Register number: E65E District and Subdistrict: 058/1E Entry number: 165
Name: Thomasina G Fairclough Spouse Surname: Kenry -- obviously Henry: James D Henry Date of Registration: Apr-May-Jun 1952 Registration district: Sunderland Registration county (inferred): Durham Volume Number: 1a Page Number: 1658
Haven't figured out where the Fairclough came from ...
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
16 Dec 2010 03:03 |
"Henia" has to be a mistranscription, Linda.
This is the only birth that fits:
Births Jun 1908 Pyle Emily Sunderland 10a 819
|
|
Linda
|
Report
|
16 Dec 2010 03:09 |
Janey
I cannot keep up with you!
I have amended the information on the two girls I am distantly related but so curious with them having Goodall as middle name even though I have no connections whatsoeverwith it.
Sunderland is Just over the river tyne from me so I will try and make that trek on friday to the library.
I will send you my Email. Linda.
|
|
jax
|
Report
|
16 Dec 2010 03:42 |
You may have the 1911 Linda but we dont and It makes it so much easier trying to find people if we have the facts in front of us. Yes I also looked at Henia and I dont think its Emily as I have found her with her parents.
jax
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
16 Dec 2010 14:19 |
Yeah, Henia = Emily is a bit of a stretch. ;)
I couldn't make much of tihs one in 1881, either:
Hethel M. Pile
I wouldn't say Hethel, but I don't know what I would say, from the image. I couldn't make it read Hester, for example.
Since they tended to name children after one another, I wonder whether Henia and Hethel are actually the same name ... whatever it might be!
|
|
MaureeninNY
|
Report
|
16 Dec 2010 15:14 |
Name: Henry J Faircolough Spouse Surname: Pyle Date of Registration: Apr-May-Jun 1928 Registration district: Sunderland Registration county (inferred): Durham Volume Number: 10a Page Number: 1328 Find Spouse: Find Spouse
Same yr and Qtr from FreeBMD Pyle Thomassina G Fairclouth Sunderland 10a 1329
Maureen
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
16 Dec 2010 15:18 |
Good grief, how many ways can one entry be *ed up!
And six births to that couple, 1928-1942.
Name: Henry J Fairclough Death Registration Month/Year: 1949 Age at death (estimated): 44 Registration district: Sunderland Inferred County: Northumberland Volume: 1a Page: 1131
|
|
MaureeninNY
|
Report
|
16 Dec 2010 15:32 |
You don't think Henia is some bizarre nickname for Thomasina,do you??
Hethel is obviously Ethel??? (My grandmother was forever sticking "hs" in where they didn't belong.)
Maureen
|
|
rootgatherer
|
Report
|
16 Dec 2010 17:57 |
In Scotland the usual abbreviation for Thomasina would be Ina. So going along the lines of Ethel being Hethel, it looks like someone had a habit of adding "H" when pronouncing a name begining with a vowel.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
16 Dec 2010 18:25 |
Oh! So Henia might be Enia / Ina -- Thomasina!
I was saying in another thread yesterday how we have to remember the Haitches in the case of Helen/Ellen/Eleanor, Anna/Hannah, Esther/Hester, all of which are interchangeable in records in the 19th century.
So this does make sense, as Henia matches Thomasina in the other ways.
The thing with Hethel M Pile is that he was actually ... a he. ;) According to the census. Which seems to be incorrect. Ah yes indeed, "he" is clearly entered in the female column on the original page, and Ancestry decided to ignore that. So yes, Ethel Maud Pile was registerd Q1 1881 in Leeds.
|
|
Cynthia
|
Report
|
16 Dec 2010 20:30 |
This has reminded me ....recently I saw an actually baptism entry from mid 1800's for an EFFEL! Someone obviously couldn't pronouce their 'th's'. Cx
|
|
Linda
|
Report
|
16 Dec 2010 20:47 |
Hello everyone
I recieved an answer off the GR member and this is what she said.
Sorry we dont have a match - thought Thomasina Pyle was quite a unique name but my Thomasina was the daughter of James Miller Pyle and Isabella Forster and she was born 1872 Bebside Northumberland
I went on and sent the Death of thomasina 1958 Northumberland to ask if that was her relative too waiting for a reply.
Mind you all work like little Bees haha.
Janey I hope you are fully refreshed from yesterday.??
Still very grateful for all your help
very much appreciated Linda
|