Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
12 Nov 2010 18:59 |
Looking for random candidates ... ruled out an Archie Mallow who I'd hoped might be Mallone on the image, but was Mutlow ... here's one (thinking outside the England box -- failing to do that was why I didn't find my own Wiltshire grx3 grfather in 1841 for three years, until another GR member found him marrying in Scotland in 1839, and there he was in Glasgow in 1841, I have no idea why) --
1901 Scotland
Name: Archibald Malone Age: 19 Estimated birth year: abt 1882 Relationship: Brother Where born: Ireland Occupation: Grocer Vanman
Civil Parish: Avondale Town: Strathaven County: Lanarkshire Address: 18 Todshill St
John R Malone 29 Annie Malone 33 Mary Malone 13 Maggie Malone 8 John Malone 5 Archibald Malone 19
and the only other apparent candidate in Scotland in 1901, less likely, I'd say:
Name: Archibald Malone Age: 21 Estimated birth year: abt 1880 Relationship: Son Father's name: Patrick Malone Where born: Cumbernauld, Dumbartonshire Occupation: Coal Miner
Civil Parish: Cumbernauld County: Dumbartonshire Address: 58 Auchenslary Row
Patrick Malone 49 Patrick Malone 25 Archibald Malone 21 Thomas Malone 19 Catherine Malone 15 Mary Malone 13
|
|
Sophie
|
Report
|
12 Nov 2010 19:21 |
no we knew nothing about her early childhood at all! we knew she has sisters but nothing else. She married within 6 months of coming back to England and my Grandmother was brought up as the new husbands daughter! it was only when she went to get her birth certificate to get a passport she found out her father was not on the cert and not the guy she thought he was!
she was told at that time he was from a farming family in canada. Was danish in heritage (Margaret was very dark as were all her family) My grandmother was the only blonde hair blue eyed child in the family so how she thought she was from the husband I don't know!
She said she was in touch with the Canadian family and when my grandmother assed her 11+ she asked for support to send the child to school. The family refused and said send the child!
How much of this is true now remains to be seen!
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
12 Nov 2010 19:25 |
This may be her in the Canadian Home Children database:
Surname: WILSON Given Name: Maggie Age: 10 Sex: F Ship: Dominion Year of Arrival: 1902 Departure PortL Liverpool Departure Date: 20 Feb 1902 Arrival Port: Portland Arrival Date: 04 Mar 1902 Party: Party of 51 from Louisa Birt"s Liverpool Sheltering Home. Destination: Knowlton, Quebec Source: Family History Library Reference: Family History Library, microfilm #1449398 Type of Record: Records of other organizations Group of Children Traveling Together
The year, age, place and ship match.
http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/databases/home-children/001015-100.01-e.php
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
12 Nov 2010 19:27 |
I don't get the Danish heritage bit at all. Archie Malony is not a Danish name. ;)
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
12 Nov 2010 19:31 |
So are you actually looking for info about Margaret too? Do you know her parents' names, where she was in 1901, anything about her sisters ...?
Just for interet -- 1901:
Name: Louisa C Birt Age: 60 Estimated birth year: abt 1841 Relation: Head Where born: Campsie, Scotland Civil Parish: Liverpool County/Island: Lancashire
with a load of staff and kids, address "Sheltering Home", Myrtle St. No Wilsons there in 1901.
|
|
Sophie
|
Report
|
12 Nov 2010 19:50 |
yes got loads on Margaret I'm really just interested in this archie maloney guy. Who he was? did he stay in canada? did he have anymore children?
I only obtained the barnardos records this week which gave me the name
The danish thing was the story Margaret told the family, which we now know isn't true.
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
12 Nov 2010 20:39 |
I'm a bl***y suspicious person
laying out facts as gathered from reading this thread ..................
she's a servant
she gets pregnant
the family send her to a home to have the baby
she maintains contact with the family after returning to England
when the child passes her exams, she asks the family for money
they say No, but send the child to Canada
My suspicious mind says ................
the W H Pratt is the father of that child
and Archie was a convenient fiction ........ if he existed, he became the fall guy
sylvia
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
12 Nov 2010 21:09 |
There's certainly that possibility, Sylvia; it happened. We do seem to have a serial-"fostering" family, and you never know.
I noted the Thomas Mullen in the household in 1911 too. Mullen, Maloney ...
Also, I don't get the reference to Archie being from a farming family in Canada. If that's the case, why are we looking for info about him on the other side of the ocean?
If there was communication with the family in Canada later, Archie would not seem to have left Canada. Which means he should be in the 1911 census. Which he isn't.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
12 Nov 2010 21:27 |
Hmm, one maybe interesting thing in 1911:
1911 / Ontario / Carleton / 21 Marlborough / page 10
Maloney James M Labourer Widowed 1856 55
in a Clark household.
The Pratts are at:
1911 / Ontario / Carleton / 22 Marlborough / page 2
So far I can't find that James in 1901 to see what family he might have.
The only James Maloney family I can find at either AG or Ancestry is a James Maloney in Hintonburgh (part of Ottawa) with daughters, but that's a different one.
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
12 Nov 2010 21:33 |
I am in Sylvias camp after reading this thread through. But it may have been one of the Pratts sons,if they had a son old enough to have fathered the child..
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
12 Nov 2010 21:40 |
No, they didn't -- that had actually been my very first thought (it having been what happened to my gr-grm, with my gr-aunt the result) -- but see the household in 1901 and 1911 on page 1 -- children were quite young, undoubtedly Margaret was a "mother's help" as it seems to be a farm, and the young men/boys they took in were farm labourers.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
12 Nov 2010 21:42 |
The thing is, though, that this seems to have been a tale told to Barnardo's (presumably so they would ship her back, the return policy apparently including "no unmarried girls and their offspring").
"The boy" Archie Maloney -- that's from the Barnard's file? -- must have referred to someone.
"another boy employed by Mrs Pratt, English and sent by the salvation army (I think hard to read)"
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
12 Nov 2010 21:48 |
http://retirees.uwaterloo.ca/~marj/genealogy/children/Organizations/salvation.html
The Salvation Army was helping people to emigrate to Canada late in the nineteenth century. Some young men were first trained on their farm and then assisted to Canada. The numbers grew substantially and by the turn of the century this organization was playing a major roll in the emigration of families and children.
In 1914, G. Bogue Smart, Chief Inspector of British Immigrant Children and Receiving Homes, wrote in his report:
During the past year the Salvation Army has inaugurated their work of juvenile emigration. At Indian Road West, Toronto, their Home for the reception of children is under efficient supervision. The children were found well cared for and comfortably settled.
Denis Crane in 1912 stated:
The Army, it should be added, every year emigrates a good many children for adoption. These are, of course, all under fourteen years of age, and some are as young as five or six. The demand, which is greater than the supply, is more for girls than for boys; which speaks well as to the motives of the adoptive parents. On the Army's side, the work is extremely well done. Children remain for a week or so in the Receiving Home, where they recuperate after their long journey and acquire good domestic habits, and then go on two months' trial before the legal documents are signed. (Denis Crane, John Bull's Surplus Children, London:1915, pp. 64-65).
=======================================
If Archie existed, and if he was transported by the Sally Ann, he might have come as an actual farm labourer, and not a child migrant.
That website has a request for info about any children brought here by the Salvation Army. I wonder whether he might have info to share?
http://www.salvationarmy.org/heritage.nsf/titles/Emigration
If you are searching for information regarding a person who you believe to have emigrated with the Army’s assistance, we need to know their name , and as much genealogical information as possible. If this type of information is not known, The Family Records Centre is a useful contact at 1 Myddleton Street, London EC1R 1UW.
As well as knowing the date the person travelled, it is also important that we know the age they were at that time, as different emigration schemes applied to different age groups.
|
|
Sophie
|
Report
|
14 Nov 2010 13:25 |
This is my suspicion as well! I can not find archie maloney anywhere! and interesting the Pratts refused to pay her expenses whilst she was in hospital!
|
|
Sophie
|
Report
|
14 Nov 2010 13:33 |
If archie maloney did exist and he was english he would have been on the births register in england which he isn't although there is one in hampshire? but as far as I can see he never went to canada.
Another thing which makes me think that wh pratt may be the father is that he only died in 1950. My father (who now has dementia) played football for Liverpool. He said years ago that his great Grandfather came over and watched him play. WH Pratts wife was dead by then so could it be that he was the father?
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
14 Nov 2010 20:42 |
That's interesting. Do you have some idea what year it might have been when that happened -- do you know when your father played? Incoming passenger lists to the UK might tell something.
On an exact search for William H Pratt entering the UK 1928-1948, I get:
William H Pratt age year date location Plymouth, England William H Pratt age year date location Southampton, England
but I can'ts see those details. Except he (or they) apparently wasn't travelling from Canada.
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
14 Nov 2010 21:34 |
When was William H Pratt born? 1865?
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
14 Nov 2010 21:36 |
1911 census transcript shows August 1865 for WHP.
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
14 Nov 2010 21:52 |
There is this one.
Name: William Pratt Birth Date: abt 1866 Age: 63 Port of Departure: Montréal, Québec, Canada Arrival Date: 10 Jul 1929 Port of Arrival: Southampton, England Ship Name: Montclare
Making for ..73 Benson Avenue,East Ham E6.
Just says he is retired.
All others that have the name William or William H or Wm so far are not farmers or are the wrong ages etc,so not him as far as I can see. Easier if we knew when he would have been coming in of course,and did he go back out ?as I can search passengers leaving England on FMP for him as well. But as he is of Irish ancestry he may have come into Ireland and just got on a ferry over here? Same going back to Canada,if he did return there.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
14 Nov 2010 22:20 |
Uh oh, I was doing it wrong. "My father" is the son of the girl born in Canada in 1908. So he's a generation later than I was calculating.
mgnv gave the gravestone pic:
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ ~snaylor/OntarioGraveMarkers/Rideau/Malakoff/P7100213.JPG
Edith died 1935, William died 1950.
Ruby was born 1908. 1950 - 1908 = 42. There's a slim window of opportunity for Sophie's dad to be playing football while William Pratt was still alive.
But wait, I am so confused.
Ruby born 1908 was Sophie's grandmother -- her father's mother? So her father was his grandfather, not great-grandfather.
From the gravestone, both Pratts were born 1865 more or less. William Henry Pratt and Edith A Hill married in Ontario, but I can't see when. For births in Carleton Cty with parents Pratt and Hill, we get only Lydia and Norman, no older children. I wonder whether the Pratt-Hill marriage was a second marriage?
Here they are in 1891:
Wm H Pratt Carleton, Ontario dob abt 1866
Edith A Hill Carleton, Ontario dob abt 1865
They both seem to be unmarried.
We don't know when Sophie's father was born / played football. Sophie -- ?? You should give the info to start with!
But if Ruby was Sophie's father's mother, wouldn't the person who visited have been his grandfather, i.e. Ruby's father?
|