Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Chevaun
|
Report
|
8 Nov 2010 12:26 |
Thanks Kucinta and Ozibird. The time and effort you have both put into researching George and family on my behalf and also explaining to me your findings is very much appreciated.
|
|
Ozibird
|
Report
|
8 Nov 2010 12:10 |
Thanks, Kucinta.
Chevaun, this is so second-nature to me now that I forget new researchers can't follow what I'm doing. Kucinta explained it perfectly.
The capital letters for an index name on the freebmd website means that entry has been double checked by two different transcribers, therefore likely to be exact. That doesn't mean the others are not right. They just haven't been double-checked yet.
Ozi
|
|
Kucinta
|
Report
|
8 Nov 2010 11:50 |
Glad to have been of help.
If you look at the possble marriage for Sarah Otway that Ozibird posted, it looks like she decided between the two possible bridegrooms by looking for children with their surnames and a mother maiden name Otway, and came up with Walter Smith rather than Walter Jackson as the likely husband.
Sometimes the only way to find out is to send for the actual marriage cert, but Ozibird has admirably demonstrated how a little cross-referencing with other sources can sort it out without having to resort to that.
|
|
Chevaun
|
Report
|
8 Nov 2010 11:32 |
Thanks for that Kucinta, that explains things a lot clearer. When I was trying to do my own searches and info like this was coming up, I was dismissing it 'cos I was thinking it was the wrong person... it's just taking me so long to get the hang of all of this!
|
|
Kucinta
|
Report
|
8 Nov 2010 11:16 |
Marriages Jun 1908 NEEDHAM Samuel Bradford 9b 195 Otway Annie Elizabeth Bradford 9b 195 Parker Bertha Lydia Bradford 9b 195 Uttley Fred Bradford 9b 195
These are just the two marriages listed on that particular register page. You can't tell by looking at it which bride married which groom, but can always try crossreferencing with the next census.
Annie Otway in theory could have married either Needham or Uttley, but the later census info supported Uttley.
AS far as I know there is no significance in some surnames being capitalised, It's just a FBMD quirk, unless someone else knows otherwise, in which case I wll stand corrected.
|
|
Chevaun
|
Report
|
8 Nov 2010 11:10 |
Hi, Thanks for all the information.
Yes, Ozibird I did mean no mention of Annie and Sarah on the 1911, when the family were back with the grandma. From the info that you have provided it would appear that Annie and Sarah married. I find the breakdown of all of this information so confusing, I hope this researching will get easier with time! Can you tell me if this breakdown is the log of the marriage to Uttley? Sorry if this is a stupid question, I just can't understand why Needham is the predominant name (in capitals)??? Marriages Jun 1908 NEEDHAM Samuel Bradford 9b 195 Otway Annie Elizabeth Bradford 9b 195 Parker Bertha Lydia Bradford 9b 195 Uttley Fred Bradford 9b 195 Any explanation would be greatly appreciated.
|
|
Ozibird
|
Report
|
8 Nov 2010 02:53 |
Sorry, I deleted the above by mistake.
I think this is Annie.
Births Jun 1887 Otway Annie Elizabeth Bradford, Y. 9b 166 1891: Ann E Otway Geo, Annie abt 1887 Bradford, Yorkshire, England Daughter Bradford, Yorkshire
Marriages Jun 1908 NEEDHAM Samuel Bradford 9b 195 Otway Annie Elizabeth Bradford 9b 195 Parker Bertha Lydia Bradford 9b 195 Uttley Fred Bradford 9b 195
1911: UTTLEY FREDERICK M 1882 29 Bradford Yorkshire West Riding UTTLEY ANNIE ELIZBTH F 1887 24 Bradford Yorkshire West Riding UTTLEY EMILY F 1907 4 Bradford Yorkshire West Riding UTTLEY ALICE F 1908 3 Bradford Yorkshire West Riding
Births Dec 1911 Uttley George F Otway Bradford 9b 218 Births Mar 1913 Uttley Sarah Otway Bradford 9b 264 Births Dec 1914 Uttley Mary E Otway Bradford 9b 282 Births Sep 1917 Uttley Arthur Otway Bradford 9b 200
|
|
Ozibird
|
Report
|
8 Nov 2010 02:33 |
Sorry, Chevaun. Things are a bit topsy-turvey with me being in Australia. So I'm pleased Madmeg was able to fill you in.
Did you mean that there was no mention of Annie & Sarah in 1911?
???? Marriages Sep 1908 HARTLEY Emma Bradford 9b 51 JACKSON Walter Bradford 9b 51 OTAWAY Sarah Bradford 9b 51 SMITH Walter Bradford 9b 51
Births Dec 1912 Smith Walter Otway Bradford 9b 211 Births Dec 1913 Smith Lillian Otway Bradford 9b 213
Deaths Jun 1915 ???? Young Walter. Smith Walter 3 Bradford 9b 198
Births Sep 1915 A second son named Walter????? Smith Walter Otway Bradford 9b 204
Perhaps? Marriages Mar 1919 Harvey James W Pratt Bradford 9b 263 Otway Annie Western Bradford 9b 263 Pratt Catherine Harvey Bradford 9b 263 Western George E Otway Bradford 9b 263 Western George _ Otway Bradford 9b 263
There are 4 Western/Otway births.
|
|
Madmeg
|
Report
|
8 Nov 2010 01:07 |
Sarah is in the children's home with the others in 1901. Annie is with her grandma.
|
|
Madmeg
|
Report
|
8 Nov 2010 01:03 |
Daughter Annie in 1901?
OTWAY, Sarah Head Widow F 63 1838 Charwoman London VIEW OTWAY, Annie L Grand Daughter F 14 1887 Worsted Doffer Spinner Bradford Yorkshire VIEW ROBINSON, Mary Lodger Single F 39 1862 Charwoman Crowland Lincolnshire VIEW RG13 Piece: 4148 Folio: 10 Page: 11 Bradford Sub District: Bradford East Enumeration District: 1 Ecclesiastical Parish: Bradford St Luke Civil Parish: Bradford Municipal Borough: Address: 72, Chandos Street, Bradford County: Yorkshire (West riding)
EDIT Already posted.
|
|
Madmeg
|
Report
|
8 Nov 2010 00:53 |
He would go there either cos he had no money to pay his rent, or he might have been ill, cos Workhouses were the only places to go for medical care. He could have been depressed (I doubt that, cos they would have called him an imbecile or similar) or simply nowhere to live. Chucked out by the landlord with no female relatives to look after the kids. He probably did the best he could at the time. Times were hard, back then. Our rellies did their best. Seems to me that your George did what he could for his kids. They may only have been in he Workhouse/School for a short time and back to granny.
Workhouses were very different across the country. By 1901 some were quite reasonable places, relatively clean and disease-free, some were like shit (Excuse me).
But people just did what they could. The fact that George is back with his mum and 3 kids in 1911 tells me that he was a good man who took his responsibilities seriously.
|
|
Chevaun
|
Report
|
8 Nov 2010 00:46 |
No mention of the daughters there though - Annie and Sarah.
|
|
Madmeg
|
Report
|
8 Nov 2010 00:41 |
They're all back with grandma in 1911, as already posted: OTWAY, Sarah Head Widow F 75 1836 Surrey London VIEW OTWAY, George Son Widower M 47 1864 Labourer Surrey London VIEW OTWAY, Robert Grandson Single M 17 1894 Machine Minder Bradford Yorks VIEW OTWAY, Herbert Grandson Single M 14 1897 Errand Boy Bradford Yorks VIEW OTWAY, Percy Grandson Single M 13 1898 Jobber Bradford Yorks VIEW RG14 Piece: 26732 Reference: RG14PN26732 RG78PN1540 RD498 SD2 ED13 SN68 Bradford Central Enumeration District: 13 Parish: Bradford Address: 72 Chandos St Bradford County: Yorkshire (West riding) 1901 seems to have "the year" for people in Workhouses. I haven't worked out why.
|
|
Chevaun
|
Report
|
8 Nov 2010 00:37 |
I'll look up Workhouses on Google, I don't know a lot about them. Would he have had to go there as he had no money? Sorry if that is a stupid question, I just have no idea!
|
|
Chevaun
|
Report
|
8 Nov 2010 00:34 |
Thanks Madmeg for the info. So Annie died, the children were put into a home and George went to a workhouse... Do you know if there would be any way for me to find out Annies cause of death?
|
|
Madmeg
|
Report
|
8 Nov 2010 00:34 |
There were about 1,000 inmates in the District Bradford Workhouse. You might find some information about it on the Workhouses website. Google Workhouses cos I can't remember the address. That was a large workhouse and probably wasn't much fun for the inmates.
|
|
Chevaun
|
Report
|
8 Nov 2010 00:28 |
Oh good, I got a bit worried there... I thought I was going to unearth something awful!
|
|
Madmeg
|
Report
|
8 Nov 2010 00:22 |
The father was in a Workhouse, not a jail. He's a wagon driver carman born London, Middlesex.
Maybe they're on the 1911 - I'll take a look.
The children are in a children's home, not a workhouse, maybe things were better in such a place. A young man (age 29) was the Master, and there were only about 30 children, so not the norm for a large workhouse.
|
|
Chevaun
|
Report
|
8 Nov 2010 00:13 |
Thank you to Flick, Kucinta and Ozibird who took the time to respond to my request for information regarding George Otway. Ozibird, the information that you have provided me with is comprehensive and not previously known by myself. With regards to your last post, can you advise what your feeling is relating to the mother being dead, children in care and husband in jail?
|
|
Ozibird
|
Report
|
6 Nov 2010 00:07 |
This looks sad: Deaths Sep 1899 Otway Annie 34 Bradford, Y. 9b 87
They're in a Children's Home but the name isn't given. There is a long list of other inmates but I didn't bother with those. 1901 England Census Name: Percy Otway Age: 5 Estimated birth year: abt 1896 Relation: Inmate Gender: Male Where born: Bradford, Yorkshire, England Civil Parish: Bradford Ecclesiastical parish: Horton All Saints County/Island: Yorkshire Country: England Street address: 85-93 Park Road
Occupation:
Registration district: Bradford Sub-registration district: Horton Household Members: Name Age Sarah Otway 15 Fred Otway 9 Robert Otway 8 Albert Otway 7 Percy Otway 5
1901: District Bradford Union George Otway abt 1866 London, England Inmate of House (Inmate) Bradford, Yorkshire
1901 England Census Name: Sarah Otway Age: 63 Estimated birth year: abt 1838 Relation: Head Gender: Female Where born: London, England Civil Parish: Bradford Ecclesiastical parish: Bradford St Luke County/Island: Yorkshire Country: England Street address:
Occupation:
Registration district: Bradford Sub-registration district: Bradford East Household Members: Name Age Sarah Otway 63 Annie L Otway 14 Mary Robinson 39
|