Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Marriage look up please
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Vera | Report | 24 Oct 2010 09:52 |
1891 |
|||
|
Jane | Report | 24 Oct 2010 09:54 |
Yes thats them on the 1881 and 1891. THanks |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 24 Oct 2010 09:55 |
Christine in Portugal just realised you have already found this family in 1891. |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 24 Oct 2010 09:57 |
Hi Jane, |
|||
|
ChristineinPortugal | Report | 24 Oct 2010 10:00 |
She was on the 1891 census as 7 months old so don't think that will be her death Vera. |
|||
|
Jane | Report | 24 Oct 2010 10:02 |
Mary Edith was the only child born in 1890 in Glanford brigg. So I guess that is her name. |
|||
|
Jane | Report | 24 Oct 2010 10:06 |
Hi Christine |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 24 Oct 2010 10:09 |
Hi Christine, |
|||
|
Jane | Report | 24 Oct 2010 10:11 |
I dont have Elizabeth Rhodes nee Gray |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 24 Oct 2010 10:14 |
????????? |
|||
|
ChristineinPortugal | Report | 24 Oct 2010 10:14 |
Jane, she was Mary Ethel not Mary Edith according to the birth reg I found. |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 24 Oct 2010 10:17 |
??? |
|||
|
Jane | Report | 24 Oct 2010 10:26 |
Yes Christine you are right it was Mary Ethal. I'm getting Mary and her sister Edith mixed up. |
|||
|
Jane | Report | 24 Oct 2010 10:36 |
There is a JOhn Richard Beckitt married to a mary on the 1911 census so it could be her. I would have to ask someone to have a proper look at it to see if it was her or not. I,m not on ancestry. |
|||
|
Jane | Report | 24 Oct 2010 10:45 |
I have to pop out now for a while but I will look in later. |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 24 Oct 2010 10:57 |
Can't seem to find a John Richard Beckitt/Beckett married to a Mary..... there is a John married to a Mary, but they are too old. ( 1911) |
|||
|
Jane | Report | 24 Oct 2010 11:48 |
Sorry Vera I just checked and i missed the Dodson off the end. I'm not very good at this. |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 24 Oct 2010 12:37 |
No problem........just checking is his name John Richard Beckitt Dodson |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 24 Oct 2010 12:40 |
Marriages Jun 1908 (>99%) |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 24 Oct 2010 12:49 |
Jane, I see what you are doing...but cannot find him on the 1911... |