Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
The CORRECT GGGFather (maternal side)
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
WayneTracey | Report | 21 May 2010 21:00 |
Hi David |
|||
|
David | Report | 21 May 2010 21:19 |
It's at this stage my tree is a confusion, because I had Joseph as Father earlier without proof, then I found William in a census that seemed the more probable. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 21 May 2010 21:23 |
Ok, why did William seem more probable? |
|||
|
David | Report | 21 May 2010 21:28 |
Ive got 1867 but I don't recall the source of that info |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 21 May 2010 21:36 |
I would suggest you need to order this marriage cert... |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 21 May 2010 21:42 |
Ok the address on the 1861, 1871 and 1881 census are as follows. |
|||
|
David | Report | 21 May 2010 21:47 |
I will do that Tracey. My tree's pedigree was ok while there was certificates to prove the lineage. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 21 May 2010 21:50 |
I know, it's also a pity we never had the thought of mind to ask all the questions your gonna need earlier in life when the elders were around to answer them! |
|||
|
David | Report | 21 May 2010 21:58 |
I couldn't agree more Tracey |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 21 May 2010 22:04 |
Get that marriage cert and drop me a line with the answers.... and we can meet back here and persue it more. |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 21 May 2010 22:07 |
This on of Thomas's sisters? |
|||
|
Pam | Report | 21 May 2010 22:13 |
Not a great deal of help as fathers are not named. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 21 May 2010 22:18 |
This is whom i think your john is. |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 22 May 2010 10:22 |
If Ancestry was working last night i could of done this then!! |
|||
|
David | Report | 22 May 2010 10:28 |
You lot are good at this. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 22 May 2010 10:30 |
Yeah you should get the paper proof... |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 22 May 2010 10:45 |
I cannot currently find them on the 1851, i haven't given up yet! |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 22 May 2010 10:50 |
A possible for Joseph in 1841? |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 22 May 2010 11:08 |
Joseph and Alice are both listed as not being from the county, and Joseph is a Waterman, so these are def yours! |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 22 May 2010 11:14 |
As the 1841 rounded up or down by 5 years. i would suggest the following are all yours. |