Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Samuel SMITH 1858 SOLVED
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Wendy | Report | 13 Apr 2010 12:36 |
With the help from the wonderful people here, I have traced so many relatives, but here's a prickly problem. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Wendy | Report | 13 Apr 2010 12:42 |
My thoughts are, why were Samuel's father and siblings all born in Birmingham, and he states elsewhere in the 1881 census. Immediately I would think wrong Samuel, but the 1891 census places him near the correct location, and with the exact same family members. Perhaps the secret lays with his father who I just cannot find relevant information on. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
cagsie | Report | 13 Apr 2010 12:42 |
1881 for ref: |
|||
|
Wendy | Report | 13 Apr 2010 12:43 |
TY Caqsie, that is the 1881 reference I have. Take a look at the 1891 census to see what I mean. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
cagsie | Report | 13 Apr 2010 12:48 |
do remember that the information is what the enumerator was told and recorded but is not necessarily accurate, it could be that he said he was born Ledbury but wasn't, or that however gave his info got it wrong |
|||
|
K | Report | 13 Apr 2010 12:51 |
Do you have his marriage cert with confirmation of his father's name and occupation? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
cagsie | Report | 13 Apr 2010 12:53 |
in 1891 there is a Samuel Smith born 1858 Birmingham living with parents William and Hannah - this would suggest the one you found (for 1871?) isn't your Samuel |
|||
|
Wendy | Report | 13 Apr 2010 13:02 |
No I don't have any certificates, only a couple mum gave me that my nan kept. I live in Australia, and have looked at prices to get a certificate sent...terribly expensive, particularly when I would be needing many to confirm a lot of relatives. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
cagsie | Report | 13 Apr 2010 13:09 |
where did you get the info that his parents were william and hannah? on an earlier census? |
|||
|
Wendy | Report | 13 Apr 2010 13:15 |
You're right Caqsie, I just found that census and took a look. The Samuel I have is living at Finchley in 1891. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
cagsie | Report | 13 Apr 2010 13:16 |
so Samuel has died by 1901 so that doesn't help |
|||
|
Wendy | Report | 13 Apr 2010 13:18 |
I think it was based on Samuel being born in Birmingham, and then matching up appropriate names and dates. This was before I was able to access more data. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Astra | Report | 13 Apr 2010 13:20 |
The Samuel Smith born to William and Hannah is still with his parents and single in 1891 so I think that discounts him. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
cagsie | Report | 13 Apr 2010 13:25 |
yes Astra, that's what I was trying to point out |
|||
|
Wendy | Report | 13 Apr 2010 13:29 |
Exactly. It would seem the Birmingham on his 1891 census threw me, but have to ask why??? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Astra | Report | 13 Apr 2010 13:38 |
It's actually Ledbury Herefordshire not Hertfordshire. Makes a big difference. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Wendy | Report | 13 Apr 2010 13:56 |
My Apologies, yes Heresfordshire, as I originally wrote. So many unfamiliar names. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Wendy | Report | 13 Apr 2010 14:11 |
I do have a possible alternative that removes Samuel all together. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
cagsie | Report | 13 Apr 2010 14:21 |
whoa, hang on !! |
|||
|
Wendy | Report | 13 Apr 2010 14:24 |
My alternative will fit if someone is able to acess the 1911 census. This should confirm the year of birth for Eliza. If I have been looking at the wrong one, then it would all fit in nicely. |
|||
Researching: |