Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Violet Clark/e born 5 Feb 1898
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Susan | Report | 24 Feb 2010 14:55 |
IN THE VAGUE HOPE YOU MAY BE ABLE TO HELP ME. |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 24 Feb 2010 15:45 |
I don't see a 1901 birth for Charles only this one |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 24 Feb 2010 15:49 |
This seems to be the above Charles in 1901 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 24 Feb 2010 16:04 |
have looked at Violets born 1898 leeds this is the only Clark (e) ? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 24 Feb 2010 16:08 |
Births Jun 1901 (>99%) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Choccy | Report | 24 Feb 2010 16:13 |
|
|||
|
Artbeat | Report | 24 Feb 2010 16:18 |
just in case. |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 24 Feb 2010 16:21 |
For additional info, brother Charles's death? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 24 Feb 2010 16:28 |
On a bit of a limb here...can't find a Violet Clarke in 1901...but as her middle name (if that's the right birth) may be Scott....considering this???? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 24 Feb 2010 16:28 |
I would certainly get those birth certificates. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 24 Feb 2010 16:29 |
That's exactly the one I was looking at as I typed the above post, Rose! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 24 Feb 2010 16:31 |
Edit + delete! |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 24 Feb 2010 16:40 |
well I'd certainly risk £14 on those birth certs in the hope that they have same mother :) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 24 Feb 2010 16:52 |
Tuts at self for not noticing immediately that the Bowers are on the 1911 lol. as posted by Choccy |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 24 Feb 2010 16:54 |
I can't believe you didn't notice that Rose - that is why I was so excited !! - It obviously connects! |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 24 Feb 2010 16:56 |
lol Dea , because i am dodging between freebmd ancestry and here i only saw the second bit of 1911 ...I have changed my font size to much larger because of the GR change and have to keep scrolling :) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 24 Feb 2010 17:01 |
Please excuse us having a little 'aside' here on your thread Sue but what GR change has caused you to have to do that Rose? - I haven't had that problem?? |
|||
|
Artbeat | Report | 24 Feb 2010 17:02 |
Strange, so i thought i had better post this. |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 24 Feb 2010 17:03 |
Problem is -- I don't think those Bowers *are* in the Furness household in 1911. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 24 Feb 2010 17:05 |
Dea the text size had gone smaller so being short sited i have gone to next size up, it is better but don't get as much on screen in one go . |
|||
Researching: |