Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
having a breakdown!!!!!
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Marguerita | Report | 6 Jan 2010 12:11 |
many thanks mgnv, will look online first then when weather clears try the council itself.... have noticed a few anomilies with census reports for the family will double check info then list the definates. it does look like my great-grandmother listed herself as chambers and not jones on the 1881 census ,even though married. i know this is the correct listing i have been given as william chambers goes in another direction and becomes related on the other side of my family.???? many thanks again |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 6 Jan 2010 01:24 |
If you live in the area, maybe you can check the marriage at a local library or archive: |
|||
|
Marguerita | Report | 5 Jan 2010 23:42 |
thanks to everyone for their help with this it is greatly appreciated. it does look like i will have to get the marriage cert for john jones and elizabeth chambers when the funds are available, lets just hope i have the right dates for that,. my only concern is that i cant find a john jones born in cardiff in 1855,(he states cardiff on grannys birth cert) and it looks like 1855 the year he was born, but will check other things at home as well, the only thing that has thrown me is the children born between marriage? and sarahs birth , we only ever knew of the 3 sisters. anyway thanks once again marguerita |
|||
|
Marguerita | Report | 5 Jan 2010 23:37 |
sorry madmeg i dont know why i said sara was 17 in 1891 when indeed she was only 7, i think i meant the 1901 index. |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 5 Jan 2010 23:20 |
ARe we now convinced that John Jones was born 1855 not 1865, and Elizabeth Chamber born 1857 not 1867? That would fit in which a marriage in 1880, and children born c 1884, 1888 and 1891. |
|||
|
FannyByGaslight | Report | 5 Jan 2010 23:11 |
They certainly dont Ozi. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 5 Jan 2010 23:00 |
Yes, Viv. Looking at the image I can see the 1 in 18 is a bit fuzzy. |
|||
|
FannyByGaslight | Report | 5 Jan 2010 22:12 |
Im thinking that is Elizabeth on 1881 census with brother Joseph and that she hasnt told anyone she is married? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
FannyByGaslight | Report | 5 Jan 2010 22:04 |
FMP have margaret as 8 on 1901,and after blowing up the image it is 8 and what looks like a 1 rubbed out in front of it,the domestic servant may be was put on the wrong line and should have been against Lily or Elizabeth. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 5 Jan 2010 21:55 |
This could be John's death which would make 1901 a greater possibility, but still totally confused about Margaret. |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 5 Jan 2010 21:38 |
1871 England Census |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 5 Jan 2010 21:22 |
It looks like it. I'm not so sure about 1901. I can't find them on 1881, but they were married by then seemingly. I'm trying to track down Elizabeth through Joseph who is with them in 1891. There is this. |
|||
|
FannyByGaslight | Report | 5 Jan 2010 21:11 |
So 1891 census is correct for sure. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 5 Jan 2010 21:08 |
No Margaret Jones in Jun reg quarter so I expect they registered her a couple of weeks after her birth. This would fall into Sept quarter. |
|||
|
Marguerita | Report | 5 Jan 2010 21:04 |
ozi, granny was born on jume 15th 1891 living at 7 georges street jarrow father listed as shipyard laborer, dont know if sept registration date thanks |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 5 Jan 2010 21:02 |
What is her father's occupation? |
|||
|
FannyByGaslight | Report | 5 Jan 2010 21:01 |
She isnt down as 9 in 1901,shes down as 18,born in 1883! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Marguerita | Report | 5 Jan 2010 20:59 |
yes its strange granny would have been classed as 9 in the 1901 census I do have her birth cert so hers is accurate, the rest my mum told me about her older sisters, but i have noticed the errors on listings after all it says Sarah 7 and she the oldest at 17 |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 5 Jan 2010 20:57 |
Births Mar 1881 |
|||
|
FannyByGaslight | Report | 5 Jan 2010 20:52 |
If granny Margaret was born 1891 how can this be her in 1901?Am I missing something? |
|||
Researching: |