Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
stuck
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Suzi | Report | 8 Dec 2009 20:30 |
mel going to look into your last post! suzi |
|||
|
Suzi | Report | 8 Dec 2009 20:27 |
thanks for everyones help :O) |
|||
|
Mel Fairy Godmother | Report | 8 Dec 2009 19:16 |
Just thinking Joseph Lark's first son was Joseph about 1841 and there is a marriage in 1863 of a Joseph Lark and then there's a death of a Joseph Lark in 1865. Now there are three womens name on the marriage but we don't know which one he might have married. |
|||
|
ChristineinPortugal | Report | 8 Dec 2009 19:12 |
It's very strange isn't it? |
|||
|
Mel Fairy Godmother | Report | 8 Dec 2009 19:02 |
Joseph's marriage |
|||
|
Mel Fairy Godmother | Report | 8 Dec 2009 19:00 |
I have now gone through the 35 pages of the 1871 census where Joseph and family are. there is only one Elizabeth possibly Read and she is old and a widow. Joseph seems to be the only Lark on there. |
|||
|
Mel Fairy Godmother | Report | 8 Dec 2009 18:29 |
I looked through 42 pages of a census this morning for Yarmouth because I saw a Sarh Lark but it was all Market Square and St Nicholas rd. Now I have seen Christines post Joseph Lark 1814 is on the 1861 census with a lot of his children but no Frederick. I wonder if he was the love begot child of one of his daughters??? |
|||
|
Suzi | Report | 8 Dec 2009 14:51 |
yes it is the same address, 139 row yarmouth, thanks will take a look, suzi |
|||
|
ChristineinPortugal | Report | 8 Dec 2009 14:46 |
Is 139 Row the address on the birth cert you have for Frederick? |
|||
|
Suzi | Report | 8 Dec 2009 14:10 |
thankyou ruth, i will look into this one.... |
|||
|
Ruth | Report | 8 Dec 2009 13:40 |
Hi Suzi |
|||
|
Mel Fairy Godmother | Report | 8 Dec 2009 10:57 |
Morning Suzi. So we are still looking for Frederick Larke/Lark on the 1871 census where he will be about 5 or 6?? |
|||
|
Suzi | Report | 8 Dec 2009 08:10 |
thanks michele i have this census, its placing him before 1891 i am very stuck on????? i can understand maybe in the 1881 census he is out at sea, but in the 1871 census he will only be of a young age???? regards suzi. |
|||
|
Suzi | Report | 8 Dec 2009 08:05 |
thanks mel, you have been great, this is very confusing, frederick has to be aroung somewhere?????????????/ and thanks to everyone who has helped, right!!! now for more searching, regards suzi. |
|||
|
Mel Fairy Godmother | Report | 7 Dec 2009 23:18 |
Will have another look tomorrow as I need my bed!! |
|||
|
Mel Fairy Godmother | Report | 7 Dec 2009 23:04 |
Well we seem to be able to follow Elizabeth Smith but not her Frederick but if he was a fisherman then he could have been at sea on the other census too but not when he was tiny!!!!!! |
|||
|
Mel Fairy Godmother | Report | 7 Dec 2009 23:02 |
AMELIA SMITH Pedigree |
|||
|
Mel Fairy Godmother | Report | 7 Dec 2009 23:00 |
Then we have to be on the right track!!!! Hooray.............. |
|||
|
Mel Fairy Godmother | Report | 7 Dec 2009 22:40 |
Not an Extracted record but this is from IGI |
|||
|
Suzi | Report | 7 Dec 2009 22:38 |
thankyou |