Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Thomas Ackley....Elizabeth Ann Wheeley
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
The Lady Marion | Report | 30 Nov 2009 08:20 |
I really need some help please with Thomas Ackley and Elizabeth Ann Wheeley who I believe could have been my Great Great Great Grandparents..I dont have a date or place of birth for either so any additional info would be much appreciated. My Great Great Grandmother was Harriett Ackley born about 1830. Birth place unknown but its does state on her Marriage Cert in 1852 that her Fathers name was Thomas Ackley profession Ware House Clerk. I did find another Baptism for Elizabeth Ann Ackley and it staes Father profession Ware House Man. Would anyone be able to find any other Baptisms or additional information on these two please. I,m sure the above are my 3 x Gt Grandparents but I,m not sure..I cant even find them on the Census. |
|||
|
BatMansDaughter | Report | 30 Nov 2009 09:16 |
Hi Marion, |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 30 Nov 2009 10:19 |
Hi, |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 30 Nov 2009 11:06 |
1841 |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 30 Nov 2009 11:13 |
This is the 1851 census....these are the people on the 1841 census that Harriett Ackley worked for........now look ..there is another Ackley |
|||
|
Choccy | Report | 30 Nov 2009 11:13 |
|
|||
|
Choccy | Report | 30 Nov 2009 11:18 |
|
|||
|
Vera | Report | 30 Nov 2009 11:22 |
Good Find Choccy...I wonder where she is in 1851....and 1861 when she was married to Robert. |
|||
|
Choccy | Report | 30 Nov 2009 12:10 |
|
|||
|
Vera | Report | 30 Nov 2009 17:20 |
Found this birth....same qtr and year as Harrietts death... |
|||
|
The Lady Marion | Report | 30 Nov 2009 18:49 |
Thanks for all your replies. Harriett did marry Robert McClelland in 1852 but I have never found her for 1851. From the marriage Cert her Father is down as Thomas Ware House Clerk. Thats all I know about my GG Grandmother.. Caroline and Agnes were her daughters and Ellen Carr was their step mother..Nothing has been found either for Mary Ann Ackley after the 1851 Census.. Any more help with Mary Ann would be most appreciated and Harriett for 1851.. Robert McClelland my GG Grandfather served in the Royal Artillery. |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 30 Nov 2009 19:19 |
Hi Marion, |
|||
|
The Lady Marion | Report | 30 Nov 2009 20:16 |
Hi Vera, |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 30 Nov 2009 20:34 |
1871: Robert is born Ireland, Harriet is born Aldershot. This looks like Robert snr was in the army. The family could've been in Ireland in 1861. |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 30 Nov 2009 20:53 |
Ah, so you already knew this. |
|||
|
The Lady Marion | Report | 30 Nov 2009 21:03 |
OZ Bird, Harriett had a son? Is this the baby she was trying to hide the birth of? Robert McClelland was not in England or Ireland in 1861 as he was aboard the Himalaya.. Later in 1861 when he landed back in Portsmouth his company did set off on a long march.. I have all the records of this march OZ Bird...I am so confused now about this baby. |
|||
|
The Lady Marion | Report | 30 Nov 2009 21:11 |
Sorry I cant get into Ancestry.. Can anyone shed some more light on this..OZ Bird was the son born Ieland but the trial in England? |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 30 Nov 2009 21:14 |
Many apologies, Marion, I was tripped up by Robert being transcribed as 14 in 1871. Should've been 41. Just what you need, a dyslexic transcriber! |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 30 Nov 2009 21:32 |
Have you followed this lot? The address is Female Asylum on one page and Gloucester Place Asylum on the next. It only has 25 inmates. The inmates are grouped into households of 3 or 4. Neither Mary nor Charlotte are born in county. Of course, it may just be coincidence that they are together. |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 30 Nov 2009 21:43 |
Here's Charlotte in 1851. The place is called Friendly Female Asylum, and the enumerator has been kind enough to add Alms Based, Gloucester Place. Again they seem to be in small households of 2-3. Ignore the "visitor" that's been mistranscribed from the following person, Frances. |