Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Mary Cooper (1820 - 1882) Aberdeen

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

JaneyCanuck

JaneyCanuck Report 12 Aug 2009 14:29

You know, that too is an excellent thought.

I imagine that lawyers in Scotland who specialise in property law, for instance, still have to examine old documents from time to time, if a chain of title is in issue for some reason. Or of course someone who specialises in wills and estates.


Heh heh.

http://www.thewillexpert.co.uk/understanding-legal-jargon-scottish-wills.html

http://www.thewillexpert.co.uk/AskOurExpertsCategory.html

No harm trying!

You may not get a free opinion for a weirdo question like this, but you might get directions to someone who could help.


... or Thomas may know someone. ;)

DevonJon

DevonJon Report 12 Aug 2009 14:48

Could be. But I think not. Its notable that the will all full of legally binding terms as it is refers to her only as 'Mary Cromar or Chalmers or Gordon'. This is clearly to make no mistake as to whom they are referring.

It is only in the couple of places where its signed by her does it say:
' (signed) Mary Cromar The Donald. '

The will entries I have I guess are transcribed by clerks into their legal records rather than the original 'scroll' which would I imagine have all the original signatures.

Thus I conclude, m'lud' ;-) ! , that it is Mary's choice to sign her name as such and were it to be a legally binding name or have proof positive one would assume it would feature in the bulk of the legal text to identify her.

J

Helen

Helen Report 12 Aug 2009 15:12

I'm giving up and signing off on this query.

Ma heid's birlin' wi the in's an oot's o' 'The Donald'

Good luck.







JaneyCanuck

JaneyCanuck Report 12 Aug 2009 15:20

Ah, I hadn't cottoned on to "the Donald" being only in her own hand.

Delusions of grandeur? ;)

You know what happens if you google "the donald" -- which is why I wouldn't even try!

Val

Val Report 12 Aug 2009 15:49

U may find some of her relatives where married to Donald families as there was a few had Donald as last names who where linked to Chalmers or other famlies

DevonJon

DevonJon Report 12 Aug 2009 18:05

Cheers - Thats more what I was thinking but your the first to hint at 'cross polination' between Chalmers and Donald. Anything particular leading you to suggest that ?

J

Tombul

Tombul Report 12 Aug 2009 20:45

I have to say I am stumped with this. I checked all we have at work, and called the library, but they didn't know. One thing you could try is to Google for family history groups or societies in that district and ask if it is anything they have knowledge of.

DevonJon

DevonJon Report 13 Aug 2009 14:10

Thanks Thomas.

Not to worry. One day the truth may reveal itself. The nice thing is that my looking at this bit again found 2 siblings previous known to me , one of whom marries into my family name , gives a further 4 ancestors to track AND ol 'ma-in law' was finally discovered living with them (a nicely mistranscribed surname previous hid her) and bless her for passing on in 1855 and thus give a magic 'full fat' death cert ! Alls well that ends well for now.

J