Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Wilkes Herbert
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Madmeg | Report | 9 Aug 2009 21:30 |
Hi all |
|||
|
AnnCardiff | Report | 9 Aug 2009 21:46 |
not wht you are looking for I know, but a connection I would think!!! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Gwyn in Kent | Report | 9 Aug 2009 21:49 |
Does the occupation of Wilkes found in 1841 match with the marriage certificate? |
|||
|
AnnCardiff | Report | 9 Aug 2009 21:49 |
1881 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
AnnCardiff | Report | 9 Aug 2009 21:55 |
Sarah Ann Turner Pedigree |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Selena in South East London | Report | 9 Aug 2009 21:59 |
Is this the marriage mistranscribed as Cocker? |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 10 Aug 2009 00:27 |
Yes you are all right. Sarah Coukham is Sarah Cocker (actually looks like Couker), on marriage to Wilkes Herbert. Got the marriage cert. It is a hotchpotch. Father William Cokeham, bride's signature Sarah Cokerhem, witness James Coukham, assumed her brother. |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 10 Aug 2009 00:37 |
Where can we see the record of their marraige? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 10 Aug 2009 00:42 |
And then there's Sarah Ann, who wasn't born in 1848? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 10 Aug 2009 00:45 |
For looking for people in census, birth details are crucial. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 10 Aug 2009 01:02 |
Looking ... not finding. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
AnnCardiff | Report | 10 Aug 2009 01:02 |
useless bit of info!! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 10 Aug 2009 01:17 |
dob 1826 in 1841 means only that he was aged 15 to 19. He could have been almost 20. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 10 Aug 2009 01:23 |
Well I have two friends who used to share a London rooftop with Donovan! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 10 Aug 2009 01:30 |
Sorry Janey, 1847 is fine. Didn't think it would affect anything. |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 10 Aug 2009 01:42 |
Well, William Turner's still extant in 1891 and 1901. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
AnnCardiff | Report | 10 Aug 2009 01:46 |
just watch it Janey - OK!!!!!!!!!! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 10 Aug 2009 01:46 |
Well, it's probably unlikely that Wilkes died, at least before 1861. Sarah and William would have married. -- Unless William Turner was himself married, of course. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 10 Aug 2009 01:50 |
I'm not averse to a bit of chit-chat. I do remember Koo Stark. I am old enough to remember Donovan too, have actually met him, and a lot of other old stars, but I can't see why you think it necessary to make remarks about Joe Cocker not knowing who Wilkes Herbert is. |
|||
|
Battenburg | Report | 10 Aug 2009 01:57 |
Margaret lighten up. Janey was tongue in cheek about Joe Cocker knowing where Wilkes was. |