Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
puzzle???
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
ceri | Report | 8 Aug 2009 12:53 |
I cant make out the address on it well what i thought it said google came up with nothing, can someone please take a look for me i can email you original image? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jill 2011 (aka Warrior Princess of Cilla!) | Report | 8 Aug 2009 12:38 |
People may not have known where they were born. They may have moved at a very young age to an area and assumed that they were born there. I've come across a few instances of this happening. Talk about wild goose chases!! When you do eventually track them down as a child with their family they are usually living in the area where they think they were born but the place of birth is miles away!! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ceri | Report | 8 Aug 2009 12:28 |
I gave in and paid for the original image of the 1911 census for Lena and surprise surprise it shows me absolutely nothing, other than Alice is listed as a widow therefore presuming George had died. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ceri | Report | 8 Aug 2009 12:11 |
Deaths Sep 1909 (>99%) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 8 Aug 2009 00:45 |
1911 census has Lena born in London. You might want to look at the image. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ceri | Report | 8 Aug 2009 00:42 |
ok that counts that one out then, hahaha no george!! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 8 Aug 2009 00:40 |
This is probably the Kensington birth: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ceri | Report | 8 Aug 2009 00:29 |
In the 1901 census for Emma and the children there is another child listed to that on the 1891 census! born abt 1893 could he have been swapping and changing between the 2 women? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ceri | Report | 8 Aug 2009 00:20 |
After taking another look at the Emma to George marriage i not it was in Kensington in 1881, although Lena is listed as being born Brighton and my mother says she was born there i found this birth could this be her? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 8 Aug 2009 00:03 |
She probably did not know that she was not a Ratcliff/e and there was not official adoption then. She married in the name that she was known by. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ceri | Report | 8 Aug 2009 00:02 |
guess what guys i think i can confirm that George and Emma is my George!!! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ceri | Report | 7 Aug 2009 23:57 |
So how would i go about finding name change/adoption etc records? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ceri | Report | 7 Aug 2009 23:43 |
I think this is her death |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 7 Aug 2009 23:40 |
Rule out the Lena C Davis one as she is on 1901 census with mother. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ceri | Report | 7 Aug 2009 23:38 |
WOW.....apart from surname is Davis or Brandeath didnt see that at first glimpse!! So where would Davis or Brandeath come in? Alice's surname? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ceri | Report | 7 Aug 2009 23:35 |
She doesnt have a middle name on her marriage certificate and didnt as far as we are aware but thats the best match found so far!! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ceri | Report | 7 Aug 2009 23:34 |
Well it does happen even in these days.... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 7 Aug 2009 23:32 |
Births Jun 1891 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ceri | Report | 7 Aug 2009 23:31 |
So would you say its very likely that that is THE George in question in 1891 with Emma? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 7 Aug 2009 23:30 |
My great grandmother lied on the 1901 and 1911 census about being married - she actually married in 1914 - to the man she was with on those census.. Also lied on my grandmothers birth cert. |
|||
Researching: |