Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Looking for Annie Macey
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Wendy | Report | 22 May 2009 09:53 |
Hi, my granmother was born in Dec 1897, registered in Jan q 1898 as Anne/Annie Macey, reg Eastry 2a 989. I've been looking in the 1901 census to see if I can find her parents, but there is no trace. I don't have access to 1911 census, and wondered if anyone could help me to find her family? My mum says that she did have a couple of sisters, one called Margaret (possibly) and another whose name I don't know. As she used surname Macey later and had birth reg as Macey it seems strange she isn't in 1901 census, |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 22 May 2009 10:00 |
you can access the1911 census its free to search but you have to buy units to view any results. She isnt coming up on the 1901 census as yet but is this her marriage. If you buy her birth cert it will give her parenst names and the marriage will give her fathers name. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Gritty | Report | 22 May 2009 10:01 |
This could be her on the 1911- It looks like there maybe a couple of Macey families in Eastry, so can't tell who is living with her, without buying credits. |
|||
|
sablon | Report | 22 May 2009 10:07 |
HOUSEHOLD MACEY ANNIE F 1897 14 Eastry Kent |
|||
|
Wendy | Report | 22 May 2009 10:08 |
Thanks, yes, her first marriage was to George T Bennett in 1919. And that does look like her in 1911. |
|||
|
Gritty | Report | 22 May 2009 10:13 |
These are all the Macey's that could be living with Annie- once you have parents names we can narrow it down further. |
|||
|
Wendy | Report | 22 May 2009 10:17 |
It could be that william and elizabeth are her parents. My duaghter is Elizabeth and I recall mum saying that she thought her grandmother had been called Elizabeth. Thank you so much! |
|||
|
Gritty | Report | 22 May 2009 10:58 |
Possible marriage for William and Elizabeth: |
|||
|
Gritty | Report | 22 May 2009 11:05 |
this appears to be them in 1891- living in Walmer, Eastry, Kent: |
|||
|
GillianMac | Report | 22 May 2009 12:00 |
Elizabeth Esther Macey shown as 1mth old in 1891 is clearly still alive as she married in eastry 1912 mar Q to a Mr Busby, but cant find her 1901 |
|||
|
Wendy | Report | 22 May 2009 12:17 |
Thanks Helen and Gillian. I just misread Helen's scond post and thought she had found the missing 1901 census details, when I re-read it I saw it was the 1891 details. It does look hopeful that William and Elizabeth were Annie's parents, and Gillian that could well be Esther Annie's sister as I recall mum saying she had cousins in the Oxford area called Busby. I'll try to follow up Esther too now. . |
|||
|
Gritty | Report | 22 May 2009 12:32 |
This looks like possible births, for the possible parents! :) |
|||
|
GillianMac | Report | 22 May 2009 12:37 |
The 1901census is complete in the sense thateverything the enumerators found is on there but inevitably some people slip through the net .Even if they were in the workhouse their names and places of birth were usually accurate. |
|||
|
Gritty | Report | 22 May 2009 12:42 |
the mother-in-law 1911: |
|||
|
GillianMac | Report | 22 May 2009 12:57 |
Just a note of caution about that 1868 Dec birth -ther is a corresponding death of a William john Macey in 1869MarQ showing his birth "about 1869" |
|||
|
Wendy | Report | 22 May 2009 13:11 |
There seem to have been two william Macey's in Kent in the late 1800s. One was about 10 years older than the other was. Still that doesn't explain why they disappeared in 1901. When the census has been transcribed, did they only do it by head's of households, or including each line of entry? |
|||
|
Wendy | Report | 22 May 2009 13:34 |
Hi Gillian, |
|||
|
MaureeninNY | Report | 22 May 2009 14:06 |
A good chunk of Deal/Walmer is missing on the 1901,so that's likely why you can't find them. |
|||
|
GillianMac | Report | 22 May 2009 15:35 |
Just put 1911 census in your search engine -the site is run by Find My Past and they have monopoly on this census -it is not available on Ancestry where all the other censuses are -the min cost is £6 for 30 units -it costs 10 units to see transcription and 30 to see the actual page Which you need if you want place of birth and occupation and relationships |
|||
|
GillianMac | Report | 22 May 2009 16:18 |
I think Maureen has got the answer and you may never |