Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
ELEANOR (NELLIE) COOLEY (update 17th dec on pg 11)
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Debbie K | Report | 11 Dec 2010 11:15 |
Received death cert today (11/12/10) |
|||
|
tempest | Report | 11 Dec 2010 13:09 |
1891 census - address transcription |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Debbie K | Report | 11 Dec 2010 22:02 |
Thanks Tempest for your time in looking that up |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 12 Dec 2010 00:01 |
Moody Blue posted the 1891 census for 103 Globe Road, on page 9 of the thread. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Debbie K | Report | 12 Dec 2010 00:09 |
This one Janey on Page 9 |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 12 Dec 2010 00:30 |
And the answer is ... oh lord, District 16, Mile End Old Town Eastern, starts at #95 for the odd numbers ... No, it jumps oddly around. Page 54 of 75, at Ancestry. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
CelticShiv | Report | 12 Dec 2010 00:34 |
I think you still need an electoral register look up of 103 globe rd in 1884, sometimes people didn't reside at an address for long, so just because their is a family with the surname Finn there in 1891, doesnt meant they were they 6 years earlier in 1884. I think if she was born at that address in 1884, then there has got to hopefully be some clues by an electoral lookup for that year. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 12 Dec 2010 00:41 |
I agree, the Finns quite likely weren't there in 1884 -- for one thing, they were quite young ... and they married in 1890. ;) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Debbie K | Report | 12 Dec 2010 00:44 |
Janey and Sib |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 12 Dec 2010 00:49 |
I get it re 138 Ernest -- a relation of Elizabeth (Downes) Bilbrough -- yes, the Downes household (pages 41-42 of 75 at Ancestry). |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Debbie K | Report | 12 Dec 2010 00:51 |
Dont Start Janey |
|||
|
Debbie K | Report | 12 Dec 2010 13:29 |
Thanks Choccy for your time in looking that up |
|||
|
CelticShiv | Report | 13 Dec 2010 14:50 |
I think Debbie means the 1891 census we are having trouble locating her Alice, she has he 1881 and 1901 census details. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 13 Dec 2010 15:17 |
I do wish people would read the thread. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Debbie K | Report | 13 Dec 2010 17:18 |
Sorry Barbara |
|||
|
CelticShiv | Report | 13 Dec 2010 21:19 |
lol Debbie, you said 1901 census again, you mean 1891. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 13 Dec 2010 21:58 |
Maybe we could all just delete our posts after Deb's that starts out |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 14 Dec 2010 04:53 |
taken off the 1891 that is not needed |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 14 Dec 2010 04:59 |
I'm pretty sure that 1891 must be here in the thread somewhere too ... it just doesn't tell us anything we don't already know. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Debbie K | Report | 17 Dec 2010 18:35 |
Hi recieved this email today from LMA not good news (mind you what's new) :) |