Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Cynthia
|
Report
|
15 May 2010 19:26 |
Hi Lynne 2! You could also try putting your family's names into the search box above to see if anyone else on this site has them in their tree. If you find a connection, you can contact the tree owner.
Why not start a thread of your own, telling us what/who you are looking for and what info you already have and I am sure someone will help you. Regards. Cx.
|
|
Lindsey*
|
Report
|
14 May 2010 15:19 |
Just in case Lynne isn't reading this, try clicking on her name and sending a message direct [pm]
|
|
Lynne
|
Report
|
14 May 2010 14:50 |
hi i have a john coppock in my tree born 1826father william and mother mary jackson, william was a gardener in dunham woodhouse, all my coppocks seem to come from around hale bowdon and timperley and a loy married at manchester cathedral. my names lynne too i noticed another lynne was answering some of youe questions
|
|
Merlynne
|
Report
|
24 Apr 2009 17:27 |
Thank you Margaret, but I don't think either of these is mine.
Reasoning:John and Mary's children were called Sarah, Mary, James and Pheobe (Phoebe).
Following standard naming traditions of that time: 1700 - 1850 The standard naming pattern was commonly used in england and the americas
first son father's father first daughter father's mother second son mother's father second daughter mother or mother's mother third son father's name third daughter mother or mother's mother fourth son father's eldest brother fourth daughter mother's eldest sister fifth son father's second oldest brother or mother's eldest brother fifth daughter mothers second eldest sister or fathers eldest sister
1st girl, Sarah was probably named after John's mother. 2nd girl, Mary was named after her mother. 1st boy, James named after John's father 3rd girl, Phoebe named after Mary's mother
So as there are no Margaret's or Amy's in the children, I think Phoebe was probably the name of Mary's mother.
I hope all that makes sense!! I got the naming traditions from a magazine article some time ago - it's been quite useful - but I can't remember which magazine.....
Thanks for your interest
Lynne x
|
|
MargaretM
|
Report
|
24 Apr 2009 15:42 |
BVRI has these two:
COPPOCK, Mary Christening Gender: Female Christening Date: 11 Aug 1816 Recorded in: Stockport, Cheshire, England Father: Edward COPPOCK Mother: Amy Source: FHL Film 1751716 Dates: 1813 - 1816
COPPOCK, Mary Christening Gender: Female Christening Date: 12 Sep 1819 Recorded in: Stockport, Cheshire, England Father: John COPPOCK Mother: Margaret COPPOCK Source: FHL Film 1751718 Dates: 1819 - 1822
|
|
Merlynne
|
Report
|
24 Apr 2009 15:15 |
Hi Evie Beavie et al
Sorry, couldn't get back to this last night.
Anyway, Evie, to answer your question, the Dukinfield comes from the 1861 census under where born
ref: RG9/1928/12/17
and in 1871 - under the name of EATON on transcription, but definitely ECTOR on actual page:
ref: RG10/2851/60/14.
By 1881 Mary had died, and John Ector was living with his daughter Pheobe and her husband (I have details of census etc)
I'll take a look at Coppocks etc that you found - may well be same family.
Thanks
Lynne x
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
23 Apr 2009 19:22 |
In 1851, we have some Copp*s *in* Dukinfield:
Name: William Coppock Age: 41 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1810 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Elizabeth Where born: Stockport, Cheshire, England Civil Parish: Dukinfield
- in 1841 they were in Manchester.
Name: Betty Coppock Age: 50 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1801 Relation: Sister - unmarried Where born: Matlock, Derbyshire, England Civil Parish: Dukinfield
so her sister would be a Coppock too:
Name: Mary Rotheram Age: 54 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1797 Relation: Head - widow Where born: Matlock, Derbyshire, England Civil Parish: Dukinfield
Ah, finally -- where to find Dukinfield in 1841:
Name: Betty Coppock Age: 37 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1804 Civil Parish: Stockport County/Island: Cheshire Registration district: Ashton under Lyne > Sub registration district: Dukinfield
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
23 Apr 2009 19:11 |
Where in the censuses does it say Mary was born in Dukinfield?
Could you reproduce them? I can't find her, except in 1851 when it says she was born in Manchester, if that's the right one I had earlier:
Name: Mary Hector Age: 30 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1821 Relation: Lodger (with husband John and two kids) Where born: Manchester, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Burslem
There doesn't seem to be a single COPP* in the censuses born in Dukinfield. The Mary daughter of John and Phoebe is the only Coppock born in Dukinfield in the IGI:
C076442 C076441 C109531* C076451
and the IGI has no other children of John and Phoebe, and just the submitted John Coppock + Phebe Rollinson marriage, 1814 in Bowdon.
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
23 Apr 2009 18:58 |
Since she married in Manchester in 1844, do you think this might be her in 1841?
Name: Mary Coppeck Age: 20 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1821 > not born in county Civil Parish: Manchester Hundred: Salford County/Island: Lancashire
Do we know where John H/Ector was in 1841?
|
|
Merlynne
|
Report
|
23 Apr 2009 16:43 |
Thanks for all the help ladies.
Have to go now - grandchildren coming for tea! Hopefully back later.
Lynne
|
|
Merlynne
|
Report
|
23 Apr 2009 16:34 |
Hi Evie!!
I think I'd prefer a gardener to an Ag Lab (even if they spelt it Gardner on the marriage cert). I have another gardener on another branch of the tree (no pun intended) - and if I have gardening genes, then why do all my plants die so quickly??? My family always joke that I can kill plastic daffodils.......
Enough tomfoolery!! (lovely word, that) Get back to your digging, Lynne, unearth those ancestors!!
Lynne x
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
23 Apr 2009 16:22 |
Re gardener / ag lab --
I have two Devon christenings, 1819 and 1822, with the same parents. In 1819 the father is gardener, in 1822 he is ag lab.
It may be that the person was actually a gardener, and whoever was doing the recording (remember the person himself would have been illiterate) generalized it to ag lab in some instances. A gardener may have been a wee step up, someone with less seasonal / more secure employment for a particular employer, say?
|
|
Merlynne
|
Report
|
23 Apr 2009 16:14 |
Hi Lindsey
"My" Phebe was only a Coppock by marriage - this could be a relation of some sort, maybe niece to John or something.
Just had a quick look in the 1841 census - you wouldn't believe how many people have the surname Coppock in Lancashire and Cheshire!!
Also looks like a lot of them were Quaker families (I googled) and emigrated to America. As mine were married in St Mary's Parish Church, Manchester, I doubt if they were Quakers.
Need to buy a bigger spade - for all my digging!
Lynne x
|
|
Lindsey*
|
Report
|
23 Apr 2009 16:01 |
a propos of nothing found this\. England & Wales Christening Records, 1530-1906 about Phebe Coppock Name: Phebe Coppock Gender: Female Christening Date: 31 May 1801 Christening Place: Capesthorne, Cheshire, England Mother's Name: Sarah Coppock
|
|
Merlynne
|
Report
|
23 Apr 2009 15:39 |
Hi Dee
Just looked for the John/Charlotte parentage - there is one, but it's in Mollington, which is near Chester. As far as I can remember (long time since I lived oop north) Dukinfield is more over towards the west of Manchester.
On the censuses, Mary definitely says Dukinfield - so I reckon the John and Phoebe marriage is probably the best bet.
Incidentally, love the spelling of PHEBE - I also have another on a different branch - PHEOBE. And I think you are right about the Ag Lab - maybe he'd been cutting flowers for the wedding that morning, so she made him a gardener (LOL)!!
Lynne x
|
|
BatMansDaughter
|
Report
|
23 Apr 2009 15:34 |
Well done Lynne,
How about this for their marriage???
JOHN COOPOCK Pedigree Male Family
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Event(s): Birth: Christening: Death: Burial:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marriages: Spouse: PHEBE ROLLINSON Family Marriage: 14 JUL 1814 Bowdon, Cheshire, England
Dee xx
|
|
Merlynne
|
Report
|
23 Apr 2009 15:31 |
Thanks Dee - Postings crossed!! I'll see if I can find a birth for Mary Coppack with John and Charlotte as parents - but it would have to be in Dukinfield!!
Lynne x
|
|
Merlynne
|
Report
|
23 Apr 2009 15:29 |
Think I've now found Mary's birth as well:
MARY COPPOCK Pedigree Female Event(s): Birth: Christening: 23 MAR 1822 Providence Independent, Dukinfield, Cheshire, England Death: Burial: Parents: Father: JOHN COPPOCK Family Mother: PHOEBE Messages: Extracted birth or christening record for the locality listed in the record.
Only one I can find in Dukinfield. Any one find anything else, please let me know!
Lynne
|
|
BatMansDaughter
|
Report
|
23 Apr 2009 15:24 |
Hi Lynne,
Any good???
1841 England Census about Mary Coppack Name: Mary Coppack Age: 20 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1821 Gender: Female Where born: Cheshire, England Civil Parish: Backford Hundred: Wirrall (Higher Division) County/Island: Cheshire Country: England Street address:
Occupation: View Image Registration district: Great Boughton Sub registration district: Cathedral Division Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age John Coppack 44 Charlotte Coppack 44 Ann Coppack 22 Mary Coppack 20 Thomas Coppack 18 Martha Coppack 14 Charlotte Coppack 11 John Coppack 9 George Coppack 5 Emma Coppack 2 Ann Shallcroft 83 John is an Ag Lab though.............. maybe Gardener was a posh term she used?????
Dee xx
|
|
Merlynne
|
Report
|
23 Apr 2009 15:06 |
UPDATE:
Just got the marriage cert for John Ector and Mary, and also birth cert for one of their childen - Sarah Ector.
The marriage cert:
15 October 1844 St Mary's Church Manchester
John Ector full age Joiner Father James Ector Butcher Mary Coppoth full age Father John Coppoth Gardener
BUT
on the birth cert:
17/2/1847 Salford
Sarah Father: John HECTOR Mother: Mary Hector formerly COPPOCK
So now I'm looking for her in the 1841 -sorry EvieBeavie, doesn't look like the one you found for me is the right one - wrong father's name. I'll carry on looking!
Thanks for all the help, ladies.
Lynne x
|