Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
stupid pills on agombar
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Selena in South East London | Report | 29 Sep 2008 13:26 |
Just to say, my daughter knows a family with the Agombar surname and I believe they are decended from French Hugenots. |
|||
|
Langdon Lass | Report | 29 Sep 2008 12:44 |
The tree on Ancestry lists the following as children of James and Margaret. |
|||
|
Langdon Lass | Report | 29 Sep 2008 12:40 |
Just found this on Ancestry...looks like your James and his family. |
|||
|
Langdon Lass | Report | 29 Sep 2008 11:57 |
Michael, |
|||
|
Michael | Report | 29 Sep 2008 11:55 |
which site is this info on as i cant find where you are getting all this great info from. tried this one and the lds site and both come up with no results???? |
|||
|
Langdon Lass | Report | 29 Sep 2008 11:44 |
Ok, |
|||
|
Michael | Report | 29 Sep 2008 11:39 |
langdon lass thats a match on the dates of there children must be them!! i wish they had social sucrity numbers back then propley this would be a hell of a lot easyer especialy with last name spelling.and lewella thats also a match its deffinatly agombar on the actual record not as transcribed |
|||
|
Langdon Lass | Report | 29 Sep 2008 11:34 |
This looks like it could be a possibility for James and Margaret in 1861. The image is Agembar and not as transcribed. |
|||
|
Lewella | Report | 29 Sep 2008 11:33 |
??? |
|||
|
Michael | Report | 29 Sep 2008 11:21 |
james was born 04/02/1815 died 1873 he also married a sarah walker born in 1814 married her on 04/02/1847 died 1855 does that help in linking them as i said bit confused |
|||
|
Lewella | Report | 29 Sep 2008 11:10 |
It's possible that Agemlow is a mistranscription of Agombar, the same that Agoston is in 1901 |
|||
|
Michael | Report | 29 Sep 2008 11:06 |
lewella definatly not a match.im 100% that she married an agombar .but iam confussed in the 1901 census margaret is living with her daughter charlotte and listed as a widow so it must be the wrong james at the work house.the agombars did have many james´sthis could poss be another? |
|||
|
Lewella | Report | 29 Sep 2008 11:00 |
?? |
|||
|
Langdon Lass | Report | 29 Sep 2008 10:57 |
This is James and Margaret's marriage from the IGI. |
|||
|
its only me | Report | 29 Sep 2008 10:52 |
i have the 1881 census |
|||
|
Michael | Report | 29 Sep 2008 10:47 |
the others on the cert are they the witnesses? what ite did you find this on ? |
|||
|
Langdon Lass | Report | 29 Sep 2008 10:45 |
For reference - James and Margaret's marriage. |
|||
|
Michael | Report | 29 Sep 2008 10:41 |
the info i have says james agombar was born in 1815 and margaret was born in 1834 james was married before to a sarah walker but she died with out children togeter |
|||
|
Michael | Report | 29 Sep 2008 10:37 |
100% sure the 1901 cesus is a perfect match with what i have got |
|||
|
its only me | Report | 29 Sep 2008 10:36 |
are you sure of the spelling of Margarete. |