Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Spiral
|
Report
|
13 Jun 2008 22:04 |
Elouise
I wish the Good Lord would offer a bit of help on this one!
I have a photo of this couple and sit talking to it (you see this family tree lark drives you potty!). asking what the hell went on...... surprisingly I haven't got anywhere, except my husband asking if I want a nice comfy white jacket and a lie down in dark room!
Cheryl
|
|
Spiral
|
Report
|
13 Jun 2008 22:11 |
Elouise
Yes I suppose he could have had two names? its certainly a line to follow.
Cheryl
|
|
Spiral
|
Report
|
13 Jun 2008 22:14 |
Elouise I don't normally drink either, but this is enough to drive you straight onto the hard stuff!
I have been at this for months, and just can't seem to get anywhere, like I said the more I look, the more questions that are left unanswered, and the more headache tablets I have to take!.
Chery
|
|
Spiral
|
Report
|
13 Jun 2008 22:41 |
Elouise
I can't blame you, I am searching through all possibilities while the thread is running, and my typing is going up the swanny. Hubby has already gone to bed in disgust!
Thanks ever so much for all your help, I really do appreciate it. Sorry to have given you such a headache.
Please don't do what I tend to do and wake up at silly o'clock in the morning with a sudden flash of inspiration.
Good Night and Thanks again
Cheryl
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
16 Jun 2008 14:02 |
What about this marriage instead of the one to George??
Marriages Sep 1854 BRINDLEY Louisa Stoke T. 6b 252 ***Cooper Edward Stoke T 6b 252 Humphryes Joseph Stoke T 6b 252 ***Woodissa Jemima Stoke T 6b 252
Havn't been able to follow it back yet though but worth a little explore?
Dea x
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
16 Jun 2008 14:22 |
Does Harriet's marriage cert give an occupation for Edward??
Dea x
P.S. There seems to be a family name of 'Woodisse' in the area at that time?
Dea x
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
16 Jun 2008 18:06 |
Nudge for more help please
Dea x
|
|
Spiral
|
Report
|
17 Jun 2008 09:59 |
Dea Thanks for taking a look, Sorry I never got chance to even turn the PC ON yesterday never mind think about the Coopers.
The marriage looks very promising I must admit, I wonder if good old Jemima married three times, to Edward, George and Abraham . The only birth I can find of a Harriet Cooper involving a Jemima says she was married to George Cooper not Edward, maybe I will have to dig lots further.
This will keep me busy all day now.
Thanks ever so much for taking a look, will let you know how I get on.
I can see the credit card getting a bit of a bashing again!
Cheryl
|
|
Spiral
|
Report
|
17 Jun 2008 10:57 |
Dea Sorry forgot to add that on the cert ( if this is the right one) it gives Harriet's father as Edward and his occupation is unfortunatley "labourer".
Still trying to track them through the Cenus. I can find a Jemima & Edward Cooper together on the 1881 census Edward 40 a Puddler Jemima 36 William 14 Alfred 10 Sarah 12 Mary E 6 Emma 4 Alice 1
I don't think this is right one though as Harriet would have been 22 ish at this time and neither Edward or Jemima appear to be old enough to have a 22 year old daughter, and certainly not old enough to have married in 1852.
This one gets harder the more I look at it! Cheryl
|
|
Spiral
|
Report
|
17 Jun 2008 11:32 |
Dea
Had a bit of a re think, tried the 1859 births instead of the 1858, Damn!, there are 3 Harriet Cooper's born in the latter part of 1859!.
I can't find IGI records for any of them. Nor can I find a death of Edward between 1852 and 1861.
I was hoping that IF I could find a death, this would then explain the remarriage to Abraham Bates.
To be honest I am losing the will to live on this one, these people just don't want to be found I think.
Cheryl
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
17 Jun 2008 12:23 |
I am working on it as we speak!
Dea x
|
|
Spiral
|
Report
|
17 Jun 2008 12:33 |
Dea
I have had a wander through the death registers for 1854-1860, what a surprise there are 3 of them! one 4th quarter 1860 and two 4th quarter 1859.
It is looking more likely that the census of 1861 is wrong and that Jemima was a widow rather than unmarried, or do you think I am pushing the bounds of logic a bit too far.
So far I have a change of name in the census from Harriet Cooper to Harriet Bates,due to the possible remarriage of her mother Jemima to Abraham Bates.
Then a marriage cert of Harriet Cooper to Edward Giles not Joynes. If this cert is to be believed, Harriets' father is Edward, who appears to have died when Harriet was 1.
There appears to be no other children of the marriage between Jemima and Edward for me to check.
I do wonder if I have gone a bit far?
Cheryl
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
17 Jun 2008 13:23 |
I am trying to follow Ann (Jemima's mother on 1861.)
She DOES appear to be her mother (rather than m-i-law, which I also suspected) according to 1851 census but that doesn't rule this Jemima out.
I am trying to locate mother Ann on 1841 but having no luck at the moment - I will keep looking
Dea x
|
|
Spiral
|
Report
|
17 Jun 2008 13:47 |
Dea
Thanks agian for your time and patience.
I am trying to track down the Jemima Woodissa (e) that married an Edward Cooper in 1854, no luck there either.
If a child was illegitamate, but the father was known would the father's name appear on the birth cert?. I am just wondering if Harriet was illegitamate after all (I originally suspected this). When Jemima marries Abraham in 1864, she uses the name Cooper, not another name, and if the census is to be believed, she was unmarried in 1861.
More stones to throw in the pot and muddy the waters!!!
Cheryl
|
|
Spiral
|
Report
|
17 Jun 2008 14:35 |
Dea Just a thought
IGI have a baptism of a Jemima Cooper in 1837 (which if the census reports are to be believed is the right year)
Bapt 19 March 1837 Ettingshall, Staffs Mother Anne Father EDWARD Cooper
I do wonder if a little bit of truth bending went on and that Harriet was illegitamate after all.
Cheryl
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
17 Jun 2008 14:53 |
I have that also - I think she probably WAS illegitimate - daughter of Harriet (mother Ann)
We just REALLY need to find Ann + Harriet on 1841.
I am struggling !
Dea x
|
|
Spiral
|
Report
|
17 Jun 2008 15:08 |
Dea
Do you think its possible that Jemima could have been transcribed as Dina???????? I have found a Edward and Anne Cooper in Birmingham area in 1841 HO 107/983/ 7, with a daughter Dina. What do you think? Cheryl
|
|
Spiral
|
Report
|
17 Jun 2008 15:21 |
Dea
Or Going off on a tangent again
The 1861 census describes Harriet as being 1 and the daughter of Anne.
She is a bit old to be having a child but it is possible I suppose, then Harriet's father would indeed be Edward.
This is giving me a headache!!!!!
Cheryl
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
17 Jun 2008 16:07 |
Cheryl,
I'm on the brandy - get yourself a glass of something !!
On 1861 - I read that Harriet is 1 - the daughter of Jemima who is the daughter of Anne ??????????
Dea x
OOOpps - it DOES say she is daughter to Anne - I think I was blinded by the fact that you had her mother as Jemima so just assumed she was hers ! (she probably is though, but NEVER asume!! - golden rule in this game!)
Dea x
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
17 Jun 2008 16:20 |
Have you got Jemima's marriage cert to Abraham?
I think I have lost track here.
Dea x
|