Suggestions
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Poor transcription!!
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
chrissiex | Report | 16 Sep 2011 18:43 |
possibly it is not anyone who has amended the name ... where someone is shown as the child of another person in the household ( even if incorrectly ) Ancestry's program automatically adds the parent's surname as the name of the child and that name shows in [square brackets] as if someone had added it ... it is very annoying when not true but sometimes it helps identify a married daughter if you don't know her married surname :-) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 16 Sep 2011 18:26 |
I found a couple of sisters who are in my tree living with a family and they have been transcribed as daughters, when it clearly says" Serv" |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
InspectorGreenPen | Report | 16 Sep 2011 14:19 |
One of my ancestors relatives was called Georgiana. 'Helpful' people have managed to change this to Georgina because that is the spelling they expect to see. |
|||
|
DazedConfused | Report | 16 Sep 2011 13:01 |
Many who do transcribe for free do so in order that they can find their own ancestors. This is often the case with Parish Records. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
chrissiex | Report | 13 Sep 2011 23:15 |
I don't know why transcribers want to work for big corporations for free ... is that the case for this website ? ... but regardless the corporation is responsible for the quality of the data it sells, if it relies on unpaid insufficiently skilled labour maybe it should make better arrangements ... if my comment appeared to be a criticism of volunteer workers rather than of the corporations that sell the fruit of their labours that was unfortunate ... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 13 Sep 2011 19:36 |
hear, hear, PP |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
DazedConfused | Report | 13 Sep 2011 12:48 |
As most transcribers do so for free just be thankful that there are any records to be looked at! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 12 Sep 2011 23:34 |
But we ALL know that transcribers are under restrictions on all these genealogical sites |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
chrissiex | Report | 12 Sep 2011 22:54 |
I think Margaret knows what the KOSB is ........... and is complaining that whoever transcribed the records she pays for at this site did not have any idea what they were doing :-) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 11 Sep 2011 01:05 |
KOSB ....... possibly King's Own Scottish Borderers |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 11 Sep 2011 01:00 |
have you tried googling?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 11 Sep 2011 00:31 |
Which unit in WW1 was E.O.S.B. and the K.O.S.E. ??? I'm searching for my Grandfather Daniel Aitken, found four of this name and two were recorded with the above units? I'm not a historian but do you think they may have been with the K.O.S.B. :-S Maggi |