Military Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Chelsea Pensioner

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Kucinta

Kucinta Report 24 May 2015 22:47

Census 1911, including little Edward 1904, baptised as son of James Cornelius and Harriet Charlotte as posted earlier:


1911 England, Wales & Scotland Census

55 Somerford Bethnal Green, Bethnal Green, London, England

James Leary Head Married Male 53 1858 Stepney Printers Labourer
Harriet Leary Wife Married Female 50 1861 Stepney -
George Leary Son Single Male 20 1891 Limehouse Rubber Works Rubber Boot Maker
Ada Leary Daughter Single Female 16 1895 Bethnal Green Leather Bag Work
Albert Leary Son - Male 14 1897 Bethnal Green Errand
Alfred Leary Son - Male 13 1898 Bethnal Green School
Nellie Leary Daughter - Female 11 1900 Bethnal Green School
Edward Leary Son - Male 7 1904 Bethnal Green School

Kucinta

Kucinta Report 25 May 2015 03:01

???

Was this another child for James William and Bridget?

Name ALBERT LEARY
Date of Birth 19 March 1913
Group Registration ID 1226507
SR District/Reg Area Dublin
Sex Male
Mother's Birth Surname MALONE <<<<<

Birth of George:

Name GEORGE LEARY
Date of Birth 07 August 1910
Group Registration ID 738103
SR District/Reg Area Dublin
Sex Male
Mother's Birth Surname MALONE

This is the date that son James was recorded as born on the military record, but mother's maiden name is different :-S

Name JAMES LEARY
Date of Birth 13 January 1904<<<<<<
Group Registration ID 4661250
SR District/Reg Area Dublin
Sex N/R
Mother's Birth Surname WALSH

Anthony

Anthony Report 29 May 2015 21:30

:-) Hello Kucinta.
Many thanks for all your Invaluable Information on the History of the Leary Family. the Victorian /Edwardian Nineteen hundreds and onwards . The Question you asked .
Ref to James Gerald Leary born 13th January 1904. As I am the Historian and keeper of my Ancestry and Family History . I can Answer that . This Is my Dear father .................
I am In receipt of 2 x photocopies of his Irish Birth Certificate . Which has an Anomaly !!!!!!!!!! As you pointed out . For some reason which I have never found out , and as you have rightly highlighted . His Mother ( My Grandmother Bridget Elizabeth Malone) .
Is wrongly stated as Surname as Walsh ? Also another strange thing on the copies . On Category 3 . My fathers name does not appear to be Inserted. Only an X with four dots around it !!!!!!!!!!. It was corrected In 1981 by my Mother Mary Christina Leary . My Mum had my dads name Inserted . The year before my dad died 1982 . Hope this helps
Regards
Anthony Leary :-)

Anthony

Anthony Report 29 May 2015 21:46

F.Y.I
Hello Kucinta.
The Other person In the Family ,not mentioned .
was .
My Dear Aunt .

Born to James William and Bridget Elizabeth Malone..

Bridget Elizabeth Leary . 14th December 1914 . At 11 half . South King Street . South Dublin .
Regards .
Anthony Leary

Kucinta

Kucinta Report 29 May 2015 22:54

Hi, that was because I didn't find an online record with exact birthdate and Bridget's mother's maiden name - so I couldn't distinguish her from other Leary births as a member of the family of James and Bridget.

only this more general record type:

Name: Bridget Elizabeth Leary
Date of Registration: Oct-Nov-Dec 1914
Registration district: Dublin South
Volume: 2
Page: 643
FHL Film Number: 101075


I think it's because the record is around the 100 yr mark, so exact date and mmn being withheld so the information can't be seen as a violation of date protection etc. Site probably a bit slow to add the extra info as the 100 year limit on births passes.