Find Living Relatives
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Ethel Margaret Roberts
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
diane | Report | 13 Dec 2015 17:19 |
Thank you Kay i will chase this lead up tomorrow , im not 100% but i think i have tried this before as the address seems to ring a bell but i have so many prices of paper andnotepads etc at the moment ccan't confirm if I have , I will keep you posted |
|||
|
JoonieCloonie | Report | 13 Dec 2015 17:41 |
I don't really understand why we are discounting the Muriel Elizabeth Hall whose details I identified |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
diane | Report | 13 Dec 2015 18:01 |
Jooniecloonie |
|||
|
JoonieCloonie | Report | 13 Dec 2015 18:32 |
the thing is that if this Muriel Elizabeth Hall is the right one ... and I don't see how she could not be :-) ... she has no connection with any vicarage |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
diane | Report | 13 Dec 2015 18:53 |
I believe you are right what I meant by a connection to the church is that on Mums adoption order it states Murials address as Stoneleigh and just maybe she was a welfare officer working for them as I know that adoptions were also arranged through churches , the other thing on Mums adoption order was an address given as Farnhamhouse Farnham , the only Farnham house back in 1945 was also part of the Willey estate :-) |
|||
|
diane | Report | 13 Dec 2015 19:06 |
The answer to your question with reference to the houses is yes, they were built after 1945 they are simular to my house which was built in the 1950s :-) |
|||
|
diane | Report | 13 Dec 2015 19:09 |
Sorry not Willy but Moor Park estate ...just checked x |
|||
|
JoonieCloonie | Report | 13 Dec 2015 19:24 |
found 1949 and 1952 telephone listing at Ancestry |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 13 Dec 2015 19:24 |
You say you tried Farnham Court but what about Guildford? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
diane | Report | 13 Dec 2015 19:31 |
Hi Rose Farnham directed me to Guildford who e-mailed the Custodians who hold old records who I also contacted and later spoke with ..... Sadly no trace! :-( |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 13 Dec 2015 19:45 |
Hi, just had a look at the houses shown in the link. The terraced houses on the right look to be from the 1970's onwards. The style of the houses on the left seems to indicate that they were more recently built. |
|||
|
diane | Report | 13 Dec 2015 19:59 |
Thank you so much for your help I really do appreciate it :-) jooniecloonie you mentioned earlier that Muriels nephew is on here ? ....I can't find a tree with her name on it :-( |
|||
|
JoonieCloonie | Report | 13 Dec 2015 21:23 |
The thing is that there is absolutely no reason to think 'Stoneleigh' was connected with a church! the fact that a former vicar was living there when he died (and I still think it was an area, not a house) doesn't make it a vicarage :-) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
diane | Report | 13 Dec 2015 21:57 |
I managed to find her and have sent a message :-) fingers crossed, i think i have come to the conclusion that in some way Stoneleigh may be the name of a house, I know perhaps daft to think but my Grandparents (Mums adoptive parents) full address is on the adoption order also there house here had a name this was used when writing down there Andreas they never put down the number , maybe strange I don't know! |
|||
|
diane | Report | 13 Dec 2015 22:05 |
Just checked Mums adoption order , my Grandparents house in Farnham at the time of her adoption also had a name not number for the address so maybe quite common then (maybe clutching at straws again but iI'm hopeing I'm not) :-) |
|||
|
Kay???? | Report | 14 Dec 2015 07:59 |
Diane, |
|||
|
diane | Report | 14 Dec 2015 08:37 |
Hi Kay,I firstly got in touch with Farnham who the directed me to Guildford as it was Farnham Juvenile court where Mums adoption hearing was held , I spoke to Guildfordcourt then ee-mailed all information I had which I was able to get from the application and order (this was handed over to my Mum after my Grandfather died, (apparently he was not supposed to of had these 2 documents)this was how I was able to get a copy of Mums birth cert ! |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 15 Dec 2015 10:53 |
Although not relevant to your searches, houses in rural areas were frequently named rather than numbered. This was certainly still happening in the 1950s. All the properties on the 'new build' road we moved to were given names by their first owners, not numbers. Those names are on the Land Registry registered Deeds. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JoonieCloonie | Report | 14 May 2016 21:51 |
new thread |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
diane | Report | 4 Oct 2016 16:05 |
Hi ,sadly I have had no joy in my search so far but will never give up ,I do have a question ...on Mums birth cert it states that Ethel was working as a Clerical Officer for the GPO does anyone know where I can find information as I looked on GPO records and cannot find anything ,I have also been told that once married ladies couldn't work for the GPO ....is this true ...if so this confirms Ethel was single at the time of Mums birth ?? |