Find Living Relatives
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Elizabeth Mary Climo b.1955
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Penny | Report | 6 Apr 2012 07:26 |
So which is the one that the poster seeks? |
|||
|
Stephen | Report | 6 Apr 2012 10:10 |
Hi, it is ELIZABETH M CLIMO we are searching for, we have been led to believe the d.o.b was 1952, but it is always possible that this is wrong. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Penny | Report | 6 Apr 2012 12:19 |
must be the 1956 one then. registered first qtr so born xmas eve 1955 is quite possible |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 6 Apr 2012 13:53 |
Unless this person was adopted, the birth date etc should NOT be on this board |
|||
|
Stephen | Report | 6 Apr 2012 15:49 |
Elizabeth Mary Climo WAS adopted, as far as I know any information posted here regarding birthdates is from publicly available index records . The "1952 birth info" applies to Elizabeth Mary Climo who as previously stated more than once WAS adopted. I hope this clarifies things for you Reggie !!!!!!! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Joy | Report | 6 Apr 2012 17:08 |
Perhaps, as this site is totally public, Stephen, it could be tactful to remove the exact date of birth and change it to just the year? Just a gentle, polite suggestion. |
|||
|
Stephen | Report | 6 Apr 2012 18:02 |
Well....it seems even although Elizabeth was adopted posting the birhdate continues to cause concern, so to allay any fears I have edited this to just leave the birth year ! I hope that will keep everyone happy ! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Penny | Report | 6 Apr 2012 19:21 |
Crazy! She was given for adoption, could be called Anasatia Philomena Diddlewiddle -twiddlewiddle now, and that is if she hasn't married. |
|||
|
Penny | Report | 7 Apr 2012 18:42 |
nudge to join near other thread |
|||
|
jax | Report | 7 Apr 2012 21:23 |
So the one born in 1952 is nothing to do with you? plus it was no where near christmas time anyway so really the date of birth that was mentioned meant nothing as the year is obviously wrong |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Penny | Report | 7 Apr 2012 21:40 |
So, to tied your two threads together, how are Beryl and Hilda related? or aren't they? |
|||
|
Stephen | Report | 7 Apr 2012 22:46 |
Jax....the 1952 birth date was my wifes half sisters believed date of birth, however there are no living relatives who could confirm this, but it now seems that the birth date could have been 1955(registerd 1956). This was a birth to an unmarried mother who was secreted in an establishment in Cornwall called Rosemundy House, these things were not talked about and remained hidden for many years, so as you will understand details are sparse !!! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 7 Apr 2012 23:35 |
Yes I know that was the date of birth you thought was hers.....but it obviously was not. The only part that was possibly correct was the day and month. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Sean | Report | 8 Apr 2012 01:46 |
hi stephen |
|||
|
Sad_Mushroom | Report | 8 Apr 2012 06:31 |
RR me for a birth in 1952 but keep checking and following a birth in 1956?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Penny | Report | 8 Apr 2012 07:14 |
Kellie - She quite possibly is, but was given for adoption, so the name means sweet fanny adams to anyone! |
|||
|
Stephen | Report | 8 Apr 2012 09:58 |
Jax .... if the 1952 date was wong for the name given then the name and date dont exist as as one entity....there will be no such person....so I cant see the problem ! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 8 Apr 2012 13:59 |
I dont know why you are having a go at me Stephen, I was only agreeing the birth details for 1952 posted by Kellie should be removed, but someone rr'd it anyway. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Stephen | Report | 8 Apr 2012 14:14 |
Thanks Jax, it was not my intention to "have a go" at you....sorry if I misunderstood you., I have pm'd you. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Stephen | Report | 16 Apr 2012 14:56 |
Quick update..we now have a birth certificate confirming the date of birth which was indeed 1955...the search continues :) |
|||
Researching: |