General Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
should we know?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Debbie | Report | 16 May 2004 16:47 |
So Sylvia are you saying that all Homosexuals are very dangerous, I dont think you really mean that do you. I would remove it pretty quick before anybody else reads it I think it is very insulting indeed. |
|||
|
Penny | Report | 16 May 2004 18:34 |
Although I had decided not to 'join in' this thread I have as I often do read through the GC members comments with interest as I'm sure many of you do. I found a certain members comments extremely rude and insulting and feel I should not 'stand by' and do nothing. Ihave reported it to the abuse manager. Hopefully either the member concerned will remove or if not hopefully GC will do soon. Perhaps if others feel the same they should use the abuse manager too. |
|||
|
Michelle | Report | 16 May 2004 20:38 |
I made a pact with myself a while ago not to make comments about anything 'SHE' had to say on any matter, but how can anyone stand by and let her get away with it. How can someone say they have worked with gay people and paedophiles, and make insulting comments like this, she would have respect and compassion, also, why would gay people and paedophiles be in the same group, absolute lies and rubbish. I would not find a problem sitting in a room with gays and lesbians, they are not the perverts, they are ordinary people like us, who live their lives (when they are allowed), who love and care for others, they don't deliberately go out to ruin young people's lives with abuse and lies. I am also going to report this person to the abuse manager, before I am drawn into one of her slanging matches again, and end up with certain people telling me I am in the wrong. M. |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 17 May 2004 19:56 |
can I just say - PLEASE - it was NOT ME who made the offensive remarks - several people saw the name SHE in caps and thought it was me who had done so. I have had a few rather cutting e-mails from people - not very pleasant for me to read after getting home from sitting at a hospital bed for the fifth day in a row. |
|||
|
Philip | Report | 17 May 2004 20:25 |
Hello Lisa, Now I've read through this thread, I understand why there was such strong reaction to Sylvia's remarks. I'm sorry to say, but sexual abuse seems to be part of the history of life down the ages. I know several people, relatives or friends, who have been abused in this way, and it is absolutely appalling! Anyone who has had to endure this kind of experience, often worsened by having to be concealed and never properly resolved, has my deep and heartfelt sympathy. I'm sure there's nothing new in human behaviour, the only difference in our lifetime is that modern communications, media etc enable us to know more speedily what is going on in other parts of the country. Also, new laws are intended to deter, prevent, discover and punish offenders. All we can hope is that the law and society will be able to change human behaviour at least a little, and meanwhile make sure that the people (usually men) who exploit and take advantage of other more vulnerable people for their own pleasure, are weeded out and dealt with properly. What the right penalty should be, I can only leave to each of you to decide for yourselves. Sadly, Philip |
|||
|
Michelle | Report | 17 May 2004 22:17 |
Sorry She if people thought my comments were aimed at you, they were not as you know. You were one of the kind people who supported me when I needed it. I never write your name in caps, only as above. But once again I apologise. I have sent you email She. M. |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 18 May 2004 03:25 |
Hi M - I know you didnt mean me - - its just that some people dont read things properly and make assumptions - and they were people I had never been in contact with - so they didnt know me at all. hugs - she |
|||
|
Crista | Report | 20 May 2004 01:30 |
Maz, Don't ask, you'll stir up the hornest's nest! The message has been removed now so there seems to be little point to keep discussing it. Crista |
|||
|
Judy | Report | 20 May 2004 03:56 |
In the States we have Megan's Law. It was passed by the New Jersey Legislature in 1994. The law was named after 7-year-old Megan Kanka, who was abducted, raped, and murdered by an ex-convict who had two prior convictions for sex crimes against young girls. All 50 states now have sex offender registration laws - which require some form of notification. All sex offenders are required to register with the sheriff of the county in which they reside within seven days of release from prison or moving to a new county. The law requires information about certain sexual offenders to be distributed to people who are potentially at risk. Upon sentencing, the trial judge places sex offenders into one of three categories - sexual predator, habitual sex offender, of sexually oriented offender. In the more serious circumstances, community notification is made. Among the entities that are to be notified are: school superintendents, police chiefs, neighbors (defined as those immediately adjacent to the offender's property, or in the case of apartment dwellers, neighbors sharing common hallway), as well as day care operators and others in the area. Offenders must provide the county sheriff with their name and address, declare their classification, declare the offense(s) for which they were convicted, and be finger-printed. A federal grant awarded in 1999 will create an electronic SORN network. Workstations will be provided to each county sheriff and Ohio prison to facilitate the registration and notification of sex offenders. Unfortunately it took the death of a 7 year old child to get the law passed.....perhaps something worth while to look into and initiating in your area. Judy |
|||
|
Maz (the Royal One) in the East End 9256 | Report | 20 May 2004 20:51 |
Hi Judy, you and other overseasers may not know that the family of Sarah Payne - a 7 year old abducted and murdered here I think 3 years ago by a repeat offender - are campaigning for a so-called 'Sarah's Law'. It would be the equivalent of your 'Megan's Law'. It would be interesting for us if you could tell us how it works in practice - there are some here in the UK who are against such a law on the grounds that it would increase vigilantism. Is this the case do you know? Anything you can tell us would be helpful. Maz. XX |