General Chat

all 10 came back as not guilty. he's a free man, name tarnished for life, greed get's the better of people. i dare'nt say more incase i get linched as well!!

I'm with Pat and Dave. He certainly needs some form of counselling and mental help - can't spell phsychiactric (!) but I don't think he is a child abuser. Debby

On what evidence as he been proved to be a perv only the press have condemmed him to that?The press are very good at that and it is easy to make a accusation from here,I did till today, the evidence as proved him not guilty so that is what he is. He is a sad man probaly mentally ill but not a perv. Dave

I said it before on another thread a while ago and I will say it here we were not privy to the evidence that the Jury had before them, we do not know anymore than anyone else. Personally I think people are innocent until proven guilty what is wrong with that what is wrong with trying to find the good in people and why do people always want to see the bad? OK I believe Michael is an unstable sad character Like Dave said, but I also believe he has never grown up mentally and he obviously never will he made mistakes, paying the first case off Jordy I think the name was, he also made the fatal mistake of sharing his bed with boys very stupid but I believe he did this in innocence. He is more to be pitied than lynched, I am very pleased he has been found innocent and so innocent he is. The man is ruined no matter verdict was going to be, that I find sad. Pat x

Some of you sound like you are baying for blood - it's quite scary!!! I hope he doesn't commit suicide - I wouldn't wish that on anyone. Kaye x

I don't believe they would have charged him if they didn't have a case, it's too high profile and a lot of money. To do it on the off chance they would get him and end up with egg on their faces. Just doesn't sit right.

im not quite sure what i think,on one hand i,d hate someone to be found guilty if there inocent,but theres this nagging doubt in my mind,he has 3 kids of his own,as a mum and nan that should keep him plenty busy,why always boys who bring him to court and not girls,why after jordy did he not think well i can help in other ways,you dont need to take a boy to bed to heal the world,i dont know what to think,would i let my boys sleep with him at 13 ,hell no,

Well i for one do not believe he is Peter Pan.

Must say I thought he would top himself too.

kaye sorry if i upset you but i still think hes guilty and nothing will change my mind however,i dont think we will have to worry much longer cos im convinced he'll commit suicide the reason being is because hes finished now.he has nothing left susie

It wasn't child porn that they found in his house, but 'usual' porn. That's not a crime.

I know what you mean Kaye, and I agree...

The guy is a Perv. Would you want your 13 year old to sleep with him?

I was trying to make the point that this case was completely different to that of Gary Glitter - it appears that I have been misunderstood? Kaye x

he DID have porn in his bedroom and they found fingerprints on some of the magazines he also admitted sleeping with young boys call that normal? cos i dont susie

Jackson is sad character but I believe he was innocent he should stay away from boys however innocent and change his lifestyle.He needs therapy but I dont believe he is a child abuser just that he is mentally unstable. Dave

What about the pornography they found at his house, wasn't that including child stuff too??

Why do people keep on comparing him to Gary Glitter? It's completely different - Gary Glitter downloaded Child Pornography onto his computer, there were no if's, but's or maybe's about it - he was guilty. There was absolutely no hard evidence of child pornography or abuse with Jackson - it was all hearsay. Kaye x

Peter I wouldn't let my 13 yr old son sleep with any man! Debby

I have a 10 year old son adn I most certainly wouldn't allow it. Also I really don't think my son would feel it was right either. Whats with these people???