General Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Jackson found not guilty.
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown | Report | 14 Jun 2005 00:07 |
One word......GUILTY!!!! |
|||
|
Sue from Wakefield | Report | 14 Jun 2005 00:05 |
Dave I appreciate what you are saying. But nothing...and I mean nothing...will make me think for one minute that MJ is innocent. The world could not convince me...so 12 people have no chance. The verdict was innocent....that doesn't make MJ innocent though. I know of other cases as we all must know..where innocent people have been found guilty and guilty people have been found innocent. Travesty...absolute travesty Sue xx |
|||
|
Haribo | Report | 14 Jun 2005 00:01 |
justice for Jackson.........like millions of others, i too am relieved and delighted that his ordeal has ended rightfully in his favour. |
|||
|
DAVE B | Report | 14 Jun 2005 00:00 |
Sue of course I watched that documentry and thought he was guilty,do you not think the jury watched it as well I do. They were also shown other evidence we wasnt shown in 'Bashirs' indicment, lets open our minds he has been found not guilty so that is what he is!!! Davex |
|||
|
lynnchalmers70 | Report | 13 Jun 2005 23:59 |
i hope he goes back to pop, and continues making great records. ps, oh!!!!! i'm not a fan, incase anyone thinks i am,, tammy wynette is more my style lynnxx |
|||
|
Debbie | Report | 13 Jun 2005 23:59 |
Hi, Im in America... and no that doesnt surprise me!! Well be warned and feel sorry for the kid who is the next victim.. Isnt it amazing what media coverage does for you.. I know what I would do with a man that admits to sleeping with kids!!! No I dont want paying for the job either!! Debs x P.s as posted on another thread.. Still a dirty old man!! |
|||
|
Sue from Wakefield | Report | 13 Jun 2005 23:56 |
Ps people are going to have their own views on this verdict...of course they are. I personally think he is as guilty as hell, and an innocent verdict doesnt make any difference in my mind. Wrongfull verdicts have been given out before. I personally think that is what has happened in this case Sue xx |
|||
|
Shirley Ann | Report | 13 Jun 2005 23:54 |
I had a young couple at the centre where i work who were expecting thier first child, he was the most caring and loving chap to his partner , and was so excited about the baby . She went to hospital, baby was born, and they came backto the centre. i was called to a meeting at social services and told that this chap could not have unsupervised visits to his new born child, his partner had to sign a document to say she would not allow him near the child unless a social worker was present at all times, i had to sign a document to say i would do the supervised visits by appointment only, and if he was seen near the centre at any other time we had to inform them, and they would remove the child. It was said that when in a previous relationship he had a son ,at six weeks old the child was taken to hospital where it was found to have suffered brain damage, through being shaken, they could never prove which one of the parents had harmed this child, so they both were not allowed to have children, his ex had another child and it was taken away at birth. I could not believe this caring chap could have been responsible for harming this child, the child was 4yrs old at this time ,he is blind, death and cannot even sit up. Then one day he admitted to another resident when they met up one day that he had shaken the baby, he had held it by its ankles and shook it in a fit of temper, i reported this straight away, as his ex was being punished also for something she hadn't done, her second child was taken from her. but they could do nothing as it was hear say, and the person who had told me of his confession would not give a statement. how wrong i was. this chap was caught at the flat where his partner and new baby were living, so the baby was taken into care. it was never returned to its mother.And this chap has never been punished for what he did. This chap was very clever. Is this the case with Michael Jackson. |
|||
|
Sue from Wakefield | Report | 13 Jun 2005 23:53 |
I think Peter may have watched the Martin Bashir documentry....where Michael openly admits to taking boys to bed with him Sue xx |
|||
|
DAVE B | Report | 13 Jun 2005 23:50 |
Peter have you heard some evidence we have not from 6000 miles + away how can you make that statement that he is a pervert, if he had been found guilty I would have agreed but he has not so he is innocent end of story.! Dave |
|||
|
Fred | Report | 13 Jun 2005 23:49 |
YES PAT, I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU. HE HAS TOTALLY LOST EVERYONE......... SUCH A SHAME! ALL WE CAN HOPE FOR IS THAT THE VERDICT WAS CORRECT AND THAT MICHAEL JACKSON CAN PROVE HIS INNOCENCE. |
|||
|
InspectorGreenPen | Report | 13 Jun 2005 23:44 |
Sadly, he is a pervert. No normal 40 year old takes 12 year old boys into their bed. |
|||
|
DAVE B | Report | 13 Jun 2005 23:44 |
Sue of course you wouldnt let him babysit your son you dont know him personally neither would I! But you dont know me would you let me babysit your son I wouldnt expect you too even though we have spoken here.! He has been proved innocent even though I think he is mentally unstable and a sad character. Davex |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 13 Jun 2005 23:39 |
Michael Jackson as a young boy wasn't allowed to do what he wanted. At 4 years old he would look out the window and see all the children playing, his father would tell him to come away and practice his singing and dancing if he didn't he knew he would be beaten |
|||
|
Sue from Wakefield | Report | 13 Jun 2005 23:36 |
Michael brought that great life to a sad end himself. He knew after last time what would happen....and he still allowed young lads into his bed Sue xx |
|||
|
Sue Lambrini Smith | Report | 13 Jun 2005 23:36 |
all i know is i would not let him babysit my son ! would you ? sue. |
|||
|
Fred | Report | 13 Jun 2005 23:34 |
DAVE B. I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU. I DO NOT BELIEVE HE IS A PERVERT AT ALL. BUT YOU HAVE TO ADMIT, HE AINT NORMAL. I KNOW PEOPLE HAVE THEIR QUERKS, AND I AM SORRY, I CANNOT BELEIVE THAT MICHEAL JACKSON HAD IT SO BAD HE ENDED UP SO STRANGE. IF SOMETHING HAS EVER HAPPEN TO HIM, YES HIS MIND WOULD BE UNUSUAL. I THINK HE HAS HAD SO MUCH MONEY AND NO BOUNDARIES. AS A TEACHER, KIDS NEED BOUNDARIES, BEIT MONETARY, MORALISTACILARY OR JUST PLAIN HUMANISTIC. MICHEAL JACKSON HAS BEEN ABLE TO DO EXACTLY WHAT HE WANTS AND HAVE EXACTLY WHAT HE WANTS.... DO YOU THINK HE KNOWS WHAT HE WANTS. POOR BUGGER!!!!!! |
|||
|
Pat | Report | 13 Jun 2005 23:32 |
Roz far too late for Michael to do that, I pity him and see him as a very sad and haunted man, who never really grew up and will never know happiness. Very sad end to what could have been a great life. Pat x |
|||
|
Stelly ♥♥ | Report | 13 Jun 2005 23:32 |
This situation SHOULD NOT happen again! He has had a jury say he is innocent. His career is in tatters......and nobody will trust him again! He is....finished .... No matter what I think...... You have to believe that justice was upheld. STEL. |
|||
|
Fred | Report | 13 Jun 2005 23:25 |
I HATE TO ADMIT, I AGREE WITH WEE SCOTTIE. THE MAN IS TARNISHED FOR LIFE AND UNFORTUNATELY, WE WILL NEVER KNOW THE TRUTH. HE HAD SO MUCH MONEY, FAME AND ACCREDABILITY THAT PEOPLE DO NOT WANT TO BELEIVE THE TRUTH. WE WILL NEVER KNOW. ALL, I THINK, IS THAT EVERYONE AGREES - HE IS ONE WEIRD SON OF A GUN!! IF HE IS ACTUALLY GUILTY - WOT GOES AROUND, COMES AROUND. GOD HELP HIM. ITS IS ALL TOO STRANGE TO COMPREHEND. I PERSONALLY THINK HE PLAYED HIS PART TOO WELL. HE MAY BE RICH AND FAMOUS, HE MAY BE MESSED UP IN THE HEAD, BUT SURELY HE KNOWS RIGHT FROM WRONG. WHO KNOWS EH????? PERSONALLY, I LOVED HIS RECORDS. NOW HE JUST SEEMS LIKE A FREAK. IT IS SO SAD! MICHEAL, WISE UP |