General Chat

227 different people have looked that thread, only ONE(as far as we know) didn't like what they saw.

I don't think the posters earlier board name should be an issue, We all have a member number that stays regardless of board name changes and then their the fact GR itself have an Error when changing board names, old threads don't always show in your new board name, But when you post using the new board name and the old one stays on the board but not in the thread itself then it becomes obvious who is posting

Roy

and the RR er dont even have the guts to own up and tell us why he/she thinks the posts are wrong ....

GUTLESS

Got no idea why I got sent for review either.


Perhaps someone does not like food colouring in their cupcakes the same as me

Whatever the reason, the RR's were totally unacceptable considering the nature of the thread.

Not often that I make comment about such things, but in this case.... :-|

the thread certainly did not deserve that sort of treatment


and nor did Errol's posts

The ones I saw were not worthy of RR'ing ............. except for bullying and harassment.

He dared to disagree with advice that the putative RR'er had given ...................


................ but he did also reveal that person's earlier board name in other posts :-D

Correct MR M it doesn't which is why I have refrained from posting on the thread itself

Roy

Possibly Roy.....not having seen all the RR'd posts i can't really comment. But the thread doesn't deserve that sort of treatment.

Not quite MR M, but I wouldn't call it being RR'd I call it being bullied into not posting further comment, Happened to me recently on another board by I suspect the same Troll as with Errol.

Roy

Edit, The troll failed, I refuse to be bullied

Today must have the record for RR's.

Errol must have the record for the most in one thread.

Someone is going to be busy on Monday in the GR office....... :-D