Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Rambling
|
Report
|
21 May 2013 22:49 |
Hi Kucinta, I think that looks very likely . :-)
|
|
Kucinta
|
Report
|
21 May 2013 22:38 |
I think this might be another child of Charles Mackleworth and Alice Harmes., and that the mother's maiden name had probably been mistranscribed from the written entry in the original register.
I can't find any other Mackleworth-Haines children, nor a Mackleworth-Haines marriage to account for her. She fits between the last two known children of Charles and Alice, and, as she appears to have died as an infant, may have been lost to family recollection.
Births Jun 1924 Mackleworth Marguerite F Haines Bethnal G. 1c 188
Deaths Dec 1925 Mackleworth Margaret F 1 Lambeth 1d 323
The last two known children:
Births Sep 1921 Mackleworth Frederick W Harmes Bethnal G. 1c 203
Births Dec 1925 Mackleworth Ivy L Harmes Bethnal G. 1c 170
If you're out there, Rose, or anyone else, I'd love some feedback as to if anyone else thinks this is likely.
|
|
Kucinta
|
Report
|
20 May 2013 17:23 |
However Thomas and Mary also had a daughter named,Mary, baptism below. Could it be that Stephen was her child born out of wedlock, and Stephen used his grandfather's name in lieu of a father to save face on his second marriage cert?
Name: Mary Pointer Gender: Female Christening Date: 03 Jan 1802 Christening Place: EAST WELLOW,HAMPSHIRE,ENGLAND Birth Date: Birthplace: Death Date: Name Note: Race: Father's Name: Thomas Pointer Father's Birthplace: Father's Age: Mother's Name: Mary Mother's Birthplace: Mother's Age: Indexing Project (Batch) Number: P01508-1 System Origin: England-ODM GS Film number: 1041257 Reference ID:
|
|
Kucinta
|
Report
|
20 May 2013 17:14 |
If this is them in 1841, and allowing for the fact that age of over 15s was rounded down to nearest 5 years in 1841 census, Mary could have been in her early - mid 40s when Stephen was born.
Census 1841; Name: Thomas Pointer Age: 68 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1773 Gender: Male Where born: Hampshire, England Civil Parish: East Wellow Hundred: Thorngate (Lower Half) County/Island: Hampshire Country: England Street Address:
Registration District: Romsey Sub-registration District: Michelmersh
Piece: 401 Book: 20 Folio: 4 Page Number: 3
Household Members: Name Age Thomas Pointer 68 Mary Pointer 67
|
|
Kucinta
|
Report
|
20 May 2013 17:09 |
Back to Stephen Pointer.
On his marriageto Ann Tucker as a widower, previously posted, he said he had a father named Thomas.
The 1816 Baptism for Stephen Pointer on famllysearch , previously posted only mentioned a mother named Mary.
Pallot's Marriage Index for England: 1780 - 1837
has the following marriage of a Thomas Pointer to a Mary at Wellow:
Name: Thomas Poynter [Thomas Pointer] Spouse: Mary Moore Marriage Date: 1793 Parish: Wellow
Could they be Stephen's parents? It could be biologically possible, depending on how old Mary was when she married.
|
|
Kucinta
|
Report
|
20 May 2013 16:25 |
It would probably be for the sake of decency in Wiltshire, as the family were in the Salisbury area in 1861 & 1871.
Though as I've shown, it wasn't just Alice and enceinte Eliza that had moved to the Surrey area, their full blood sibs Samuel and Louisa as well as Edith were also either living or 'visiting' the area along with possible sib George, born Salisbury c1872, in the census of 1881.
|
|
MickB
|
Report
|
20 May 2013 16:19 |
Thank you RR. Now a photo would be something wouldn't it? My cousin in Oz has sent me a pic of my father and a pic of his brother. I look like both of them. It's spooky.
Kucinta - I agree with your last paragraph. I think the theory that Eliza Jane was shipped off to Kingston for the sake of decency in Hampshire holds water.
|
|
Kucinta
|
Report
|
20 May 2013 16:13 |
if you remember, the 1893 baptism for Eliza Jane's son, previously posted, had his name as Henry John Harmes
His birth ref, as a Pointer, also previously posted, had an initial 'H' that I reckon stood for Harmes
Name Henry John H Pointer Year of Registration 1886 Quarter of Registration Jul-Aug-Sep Registration District Kingston Registration County Surrey Mother's maiden name Volume Number 2A Volume Page 329
This third name/initial is missing from Alice's birth ref. There is also a bit of a gap between the bith of Alice and the birth of Henry John.
I'm pretty confident Harry is Henry John's father, but think it much less likely that he's Alice's biological father, though he seems to have embraced the paternal role.
EDIT: I also wonder whether that baptism, when Henry John was about 6 or 7, was an attempt to make him an 'official' Harmes.
In which case, is the fact we can't currently find a baptism for Alice as a Harmes (or even as a Poynter/Pointer) significant?
|
|
Rambling
|
Report
|
20 May 2013 16:03 |
Hi Mick, I have a similar situation with one of my gt's, born before the marriage of 'parents' I can not be sure one way or the other whether his father IS his father or if father is 'unknown'.
I'm lucky in that I've got a photo of both together when old, but I have looked at them for ages and still not sure whether there is enough of a resemblance to say they are blood relatives.
|
|
MickB
|
Report
|
20 May 2013 15:54 |
I'm not very good at this am I? I looked under Harmes. gawd...
She is born in Q3 apparently, right where I thought, so I got something right.
I wonder, having the name Pointer, if this means Eliza Jane hadn't yet met Henry Sr? If they had been having a thing, surely they would have given Alice the name Harmes?
Edit: but then mebbe not cos he was married to Ms Heather.
Trying to put the human side on to all these records. :-)
|
|
Kucinta
|
Report
|
20 May 2013 15:31 |
Births Sep 1881 POINTER Alice Lisette Kingston 2a 317 Pointer Alice Lisette Kington 6a 317
(previously posted by Rose)
|
|
Kucinta
|
Report
|
20 May 2013 15:29 |
Still can't find Stephen, he's not with either of the other children from census 1871, one of whom is happily mistranscribed. A George Pointer born 1872 has also surfaced...
Note at least two more of Stephen's children have moved to the Surrey/London area
census 1881:
Address: 1, Thomas St, Horsleydown County: London, Surrey
SHEARMAN, Frank Head Single M 34 1847 Cook (Nd) Paddington, Middlesex POINTET, Samuel Boarder Single M 20 1861 Railway Porter Salisbury, Wiltshire<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
and
Address: Highland Road, Leatherhead County: Surrey
HAISNER, James Head Married M 46 1835 Bricklayer Deptford, Kent POINTER, Louisa Visitor Single F 16 1865 Dom Serv Salisbury, Wiltshire<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< POINTER, George Visitor Single M 9 1872 Scholar Salisbury, Wiltshire??????
|
|
MickB
|
Report
|
20 May 2013 15:24 |
Just having a peruse in the free births for Alice and found a Daisy Louise born in Kingston in Q3 1881 2a 320. That's where I would have put Alice being born. Can't find Alice though.
Edit: or maybe in Q4 before she showed too much in April. Of course, we don't when she got there.
|
|
Kucinta
|
Report
|
20 May 2013 15:11 |
Yes,
I too wondered if they'd come to dump Eliza and her 'shame' on sister Alice (and then named the baby after her)
I still haven't found Stephen and the rest of the family.
Pointlo is meant to be Pointer. Given the Alice/Anna fiasco i think the enumerator was on the careless side when writing up the 'good' copy in the census books.
I'l pm you the image. EDIT: Just realised you must already have it as you say you downloaded it.
To be fair, Grandad Charles may not have been too sure when he was born, especially as he seems to have mislaid his parents when he was still just a lad.
|
|
MickB
|
Report
|
20 May 2013 14:59 |
I had to download it to have a look. What a clever find. You amaze me. You wouldn't let this go would you? Brilliant stuff. How on earth did you find it? And what on earth is Pointlo ? Is that supposed to be Pointer?
I dug out her birth details -
Name Eliza Jane Pointer Year of Registration 1858 Quarter of Registration Jan-Feb-Mar Registration District South Stoneham Registration County Hampshire Mother's maiden name Volume Number 2C Volume Page 56
The census is taken in April and that would make her 23 not 22 as she stated. They were careless with the dob in those days. Bit like Grandad Charles.
1st cousin in Oz apparently has Alice Lizzette's birth certificate, born in 1881. She says it shows 'Father unknown'. I am interested to see what her date of birth is. I am wondering if Eliza Jane came to stay with her sister to have the baby, i.e. away from Hampshire. They did that in those days (still do ;-)
|
|
Kucinta
|
Report
|
20 May 2013 12:05 |
FINALLY found Eliza Jane in i881.
She was visiting with her married sister Alice, but fmp transcribed them separately:
Census 1881:
Address: 15, Canbury Fields, Fredk Place, Kingston County: Surrey
POINTLO, Alice Visitor Head Married F 49 1832 Laundress Poole, Dorset POINTLO, Eliza Visitor Single F 22 1859 Laundry Maid Shirley, Hampshire<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< POINTLO, Edith Visitor Single F 12 1869 Scholar Salisbury, Wiltshire
NB 'Alice' aged 49 has her forename dittoed from that of her daughter Alice Dendy above her on the census page. I believe the census enumerator probably misread his own notes when writing up the census book, and mistook 'Anna' for another 'Alice'.
Address: 15, Canbury Fields, Fredk Place, Kingston County: Surrey
DENDY, John Head Married M 25 1856 Gen Labourer Kingston, Surrey DENDY, Alice Wife Married F 24 1857 Shirley, Hampshire<<<<<<
Marriages Dec 1877 DENDY John Kingston 2a 437<<<<<<<<<<<< Poynter Alice Kingston 2a 437 <<<<<<<<<<<<< Stevens Ellen Kingston 2a 437 White John Kingston 2a 437
Now you just need to find an old street map and see how close Harry's address was to Eliza's...
|
|
MickB
|
Report
|
20 May 2013 00:53 |
Kucinta
I cannot thank you enough for all this. You have certainly covered all the bases with Eliza Jane and Alice Lizzette. In summary -
There was a rumour my Oz cousin got from her mother that our grandmother Alice Lizzette was illegitimate. Your research and RR suggest this to be true. We do not know who the father is although Alice took the name Harmes when her mother, Eliza Jane Pointer, married a long time companion Henry Chapman Harmes. Her half-brother Henry John Pointer b1886 also took the name Harmes from that marriage in 1891.Henry Sr may be the father of both but we simply don't know.
It appears that Henry Chapman Harmes was married before to an Elizabeth Heather and this was why he was a long time companion of 20 years or more to Eliza Jane. No death or divorce has been found for this Elizabeth and he is back living with his mother in the 1881 census and stating he is married. This could suggest that the marriage was on the rocks but no divorce has been found. And neither has Elizabeth.
Further back, Eliza Jane was born in about 1859 to Stephen Pointer and Ann Pointer (nee Tucker) in Shirley, Hants. In the 1861 census, the transcribed place 'Wotter' turns out to be Wellow. Kucinta also found that Eliza's father was convicted of larceny in 1851 and served one month.
Finally, Henry J Harmes Jr, Alice's half-brother died in about 1960 at the age of 73. Alice Lizzette, the reason for this particular part of the search died in 1971, aged 90, and is buried in Manor Park cemetery, East London.
Kucinta and RR thank you both very much for you tireless efforts to help me. You did practically all of it - I merely typed it in.
mick
|
|
MickB
|
Report
|
19 May 2013 21:00 |
Re the jailbird evidence. I am happy to report that the family business carried on well into the 20th Century....
|
|
Kucinta
|
Report
|
19 May 2013 15:30 |
Death of Henry John's wife?
Name: Elizabeth Harmes Birth Date: abt 1886 Date of Registration: Jul-Aug-Sep 1957 Age at Death: 71 Registration District: Surrey Northern Inferred County: Surrey Volume: 5g Page: 294
Probate:
Name: Elizabeth Harmes Birth Date: abt 1886 Date of Registration: Jul-Aug-Sep 1957 Age at Death: 71 Registration District: Surrey Northern Inferred County: Surrey Volume: 5g Page: 294
Of 12 Acre Road K upon T. (wife of Henry John Harmes). Administration to the said Henry John Harmes retired painter and decorator. Effects £243 13s 6d.
|
|
Kucinta
|
Report
|
19 May 2013 15:21 |
Marriage:
Name: Lily E J Harmes Spouse Surname: Linford Date of Registration: Apr-May-Jun 1935 Registration District: Surrey Mid Eastern Inferred County: Surrey Volume Number: 2a Page Number: 771 Spouse: Linford James A Harmes Surrey Mid.E 2a 771
Two Linford children, mmn Harmes born in the 1930s. Won't put here for privacy reasons as may well be still living.
|