General Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Lost information /update/BIG THANK YOU
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Rambling | Report | 17 Jun 2010 21:11 |
Thanks K...there just seems to be a discrepancy somewhere which I can't find an answer to? If as the article says she was under 18 in 1866 marriage....it doesn't give much leeway...i'm still not convinced that the second marriage to Samuel Shaw is right because of the father's name being Henry rather than John? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 17 Jun 2010 21:05 |
I've been trying to find one of the sons on military records to see if there's a clue there but I don't know if they are Tyler or Shaw. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
K | Report | 17 Jun 2010 21:04 |
I did this Ann with the right birthplace but probably too young? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 17 Jun 2010 21:00 |
ah now that's the problem Vera lol, we know that Ann Shaw was in Islington in 1927 from the newspaper article...but not if she was there in 1911... really need to find her with some of her sons or poss husband Samuel Shaw, on 1901 first |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 17 Jun 2010 20:41 |
Rose, |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 17 Jun 2010 20:28 |
Thanks Rose. |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 17 Jun 2010 20:14 |
Nudged for Vera! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 17 Jun 2010 18:48 |
Particularly useful might be the 1911 for Ann Shaw Islington ...I can't find her in 1901? can someone? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 17 Jun 2010 18:06 |
Searchers please help ! :)) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
dutch | Report | 17 Jun 2010 14:03 |
ok thank you and this is what i have on Anns family on 1851 census |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 17 Jun 2010 13:55 |
I will send the image for that marriage to you via email Dutch |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 17 Jun 2010 13:50 |
Thats interesting Dutch, there will be a record of that somewhere I'm sure...i will see what I can find. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
dutch | Report | 17 Jun 2010 13:50 |
Rose does it have page vol number and page number please |
|||
|
dutch | Report | 17 Jun 2010 13:45 |
Rose thats the right one her father was Henry her sister Mary i have been trying to find the marriage for her,but without any sucess as i know shes buried with military honours but cant look for her grave as i dont no her married name or when she died,i no were shes buried and ive rang up but got no joy,if i could find her it would be realy great as Queen Victoria sent acoach to bring her to the palace for tea for her bravery in the Indian Mutiny as she crawled over slain bodies to bring water to her her husband,but she was born in America as Henry her dad was in the army and they came from Ireland,nobody has been able to help so far with this one aright brick wall |
|||
|
dutch | Report | 17 Jun 2010 13:36 |
I dont know Rose with the marriage date for 1885,the one alady found for me was Ann Tyler married to John Thomas shaw june-sept 1885 Lambeth |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 17 Jun 2010 13:30 |
Ok so from the London records confirming that marriage IS likely to be the one (see father's name) Ann is a Widower address 92 marchmont st |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 17 Jun 2010 13:17 |
So the re marriage of Ann, is AFTER William's death...possibly the one Shirley posted |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
dutch | Report | 17 Jun 2010 13:13 |
also they were both at that address in 1886 |
|||
|
dutch | Report | 17 Jun 2010 13:03 |
have delete other thread so dont get everyone in amuddle |
|||
|
dutch | Report | 17 Jun 2010 13:01 |
yes this is what it reads |