General Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

What's your MP been claiming ?

Page 3 + 1 of 5

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. »
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Staffs Col

Staffs Col Report 19 May 2009 20:46

No just to pay for some of the items themselves - if I thought that a kit kat would enable my MP to do his job better then I wouldnt complain but I dont see how such trivial purchases have to be passed on to the taxpayer. As for the 46" TV that is mentioned that was a top of range £8000 model. Is the MP unable to purchase a smaller £399 21'' - of course not not whilst us mugs carry on paying through the nose.
As far as visits from foreign Government Ministers are concerned nine times out of ten they reside at their country's Embassy or Consulate and if the MP does entertain guess what he claims for that from the Foreign Office

JaneyCanuck

JaneyCanuck Report 19 May 2009 20:41

Bath plug 80p
Barbecue
Mole catching
tampons (a male MP!)
dog food
child's cot
Kit Kat
46 in flatscreen TV
carpets
leather sofas
hanging baskets


Perhaps the MP should have been restricted to taking showers, and having no plug for the bath.

The child should have slept on the floor? Or the MP should have had to pay for a cot in both locations, or never had family with him/her in London?

MPs should have to tolerate moles? I assume moles do destructive things; we don't have 'em.

MPs should live in uncarpeted unfurnished cold-water walk-ups with no plants, I guess.

MPs never need to host events in their homes for visitors from the home constituency, from abroad. One of those Japanese-style stacked sleeping cells should do them fine.


I have no doubt that some MPs have overclaimed and claimed unjustified expenses. But honestly. Someone really thinks MPs should not have plugs for their bathtubs?

Cumbrian Caz~**~

Cumbrian Caz~**~ Report 19 May 2009 20:38

Hi B,

Im going to have a look but may need a bucket, what do they know of ordinary people, with mortgages, businesses, tiny pay rises and bills..........nowt!!!

Caz xxx

JaneyCanuck

JaneyCanuck Report 19 May 2009 20:37

"I would think the " office " is a small bedroom in his 1st home."

I would think you think wrong, McB. I might also have thought you'd bother to find out, but I guess not.

Here's me, defending a Tory. Or a principle.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/mpdb/html/21.stm

Constituency address:
100 Walton Street, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire , HP21 7QP

Looks rather like a large commercial buiding, on Google maps satellite view, to me.

₪ TeresaW elite empress of deleted threads&#

₪ TeresaW elite empress of deleted threads&# Report 19 May 2009 20:36

Janey, take a look at this...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/5318810/MPs-expenses-20-most-bizarre-claims.html

Staffs Col

Staffs Col Report 19 May 2009 20:36

Remember the MP's husband who 'accidently' billed the taxpayer for his cable porn films - hmmm then people wonder why get miffed

₪ TeresaW elite empress of deleted threads&#

₪ TeresaW elite empress of deleted threads&# Report 19 May 2009 20:32

Janey, in all the scandal around here, not one person has quibbled about staffing expenses, although in past months mention has been made of oen or two claiming staffing allowance for a son who was not actually working for him, and a wife who ran her own business and didn't work for him.

It is the abuse of the second home mortgage allowance. They are not just claiming a little assistance with a second home, but they are using it to claim the most ridiculous of things. Bear in mind that whatever they claim for should be for their own personal use and relevant to their job.

Bath plug 80p
Barbecue
Mole catching
tampons (a male MP!)
dog food
child's cot
Kit Kat
46 in flatscreen TV
carpets
leather sofas
hanging baskets


Then there are those who have more than bent the rules with their second home allowance.

ie the married couple, both MP's. Living in town A with second home in town B. Mr claims home in town A is second home, Mrs claims home in town B is second home.

The one who was claiming £800 a month and did not question it when it was still going in his bank for 18 months AFTER his mortgage was paid off. He says he didn't know...er hello!

Or the one who used his second home allowance to re-furbish his 'second home' then quickly switched the listed second home and sold the refurbished one for £300,000.

Remember, it's tax payers money. If anyone else had fiddled their claims in that way they woudl be accountable to their bosses at best and to the courts at worst.

Staffs Col

Staffs Col Report 19 May 2009 20:29

Well I have to pay for food, travel etc out of my salary which is no where near the £67000+ UK MP's get as their basic - I dont think its unreasonable to expect them to pay for some things from that - read the list of trivial things that they have claimed for then wonder again why we Brits are absolutely fuming

McB

McB Report 19 May 2009 20:26

Snap. lol

McB

McB Report 19 May 2009 20:25

There ya go

Constituency: Norwich North
MP: Gibson, Dr Ian
Party: LAB
Expenses
Second Home: £16,216
London Supplement: £0
Office: £10,754
Staffing: £98,119
Stationery: £796
IT Provision: £1,023
Staff Cover: £0
Communication: £4,095
Travel: £2,967

Total Expenses: £136,241

₪ TeresaW elite empress of deleted threads&#

₪ TeresaW elite empress of deleted threads&# Report 19 May 2009 20:23

Well thats no good, it doesn't even have my constituency on it! Norwich North, Ian Gibson, if anyone can find it....*tsk*


Edit: Found it, it's teeeny tiny lol

Constituency: Norwich North
MP: Gibson, Dr Ian
Party: LAB
Expenses
Second Home: £16,216
London Supplement: £0
Office: £10,754
Staffing: £98,119
Stationery: £796
IT Provision: £1,023
Staff Cover: £0
Communication: £4,095
Travel: £2,967

Total Expenses: £136,241

McB

McB Report 19 May 2009 20:21

I would think the " office " is a small bedroom in his 1st home.

JaneyCanuck

JaneyCanuck Report 19 May 2009 20:19

And again we see that STAFFING accounts for something in the region of 60% of total expenses claimed ...

Unless the MP is employing his/her spouse, child, sibling-in-law, I can't imagine this being seen as a problem.

And I wonder whether many people moaning about these expenses know that this is the largest chunk of every MP's expense claims.

JoyBoroAngel

JoyBoroAngel Report 19 May 2009 20:15

Constituency: Middlesbrough South and Cleveland East
MP: Kumar, Dr Ashok
Party: LAB
Expenses
Second Home: £23,083
London Supplement: £0
Office: £12,034
Staffing: £90,972
Stationery: £769
IT Provision: £1,109
Staff Cover: £0
Communication: £10,424
Travel: £15,328

Total Expenses: £156,385

me

me Report 19 May 2009 19:58

Constituency: Knowsley North and Sefton East
MP: Howarth, Rt Hon George
Party: LAB
Expenses
Second Home: £13,896
London Supplement: £0
Office: £15,094
Staffing: £92,979
Stationery: £679
IT Provision: £1,459
Staff Cover: £0
Communication: £8,634
Travel: £15,380

Total Expenses: £149,809

JaneyCanuck

JaneyCanuck Report 19 May 2009 19:58

I'm not getting it.

What is insane about this?

Second Home: £19,470
London Supplement: £0
Office: £11,239
Staffing: £70,833
Stationery: £627
IT Provision: £1,283
Staff Cover: £0
Communication: £5,090
Travel: £4,659

MPs have to maintain offices in their constinuencies. Did someone prefer that constituents have to travel to London to meet with their MP?

That's the £11,239, I assume.

MPs have to have staff -- both in London and in their home constituency. Who wants the telephone at a constituency office to be answered by a machine? Who wants to be unable to communicate with their MP unless s/he is at home on a weekend? Who wants their MP to be unable to do the job s/he is paid to do in London, because s/he is too busy answering phones and filing things?

That's what the £70,833 is for.
The MP didn't get that money personally. Really, s/he didn't.
And that's about 60% of total expenses.

Stationery: £627
Paper, pens, file folders, envelopes, paper clips, staples ...
A bargain, I'd say.

IT Provision: £1,283
To maintain/upgrade computer equipment or something?
What else might it have been spent on?

Communication: £5,090
Amazing, that an MP should be in contact with people by long distance telephone. Maybe even have a cell phone. Or two.

And then we have:

Second Home: £19,470

£1645/month for a home in London -- accommodation, utilities ...
From what I hear on the things I watch on BBC Canada, that isn't exactly likely to be palatial digs.

quick google: http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080920153837AAuI1Df
"to rent a one bedroom flat in zone 1 will probably cost you at least £1300 a month. If you wanted to live in some of the more 'desirable' areas like Chelsea or Kensington you'll be paying even more than that."

Maybe MPs are supposed to commute every weekday from their home constituency to London? And then we'd be complaining about the train fare?

Travel: £4,659

They *do* have to commute. Amazingly.


So I'm curious. Just what parts of that total £115,891 are people so horrified by, and what do they suggest should be cut out?

maggiewinchester

maggiewinchester Report 19 May 2009 19:54

Mine has claimed £155, 911 :o(

£22,993 was for his second home

Staffs Col

Staffs Col Report 19 May 2009 19:47

Bargain mine came in at £131,000

Granny  Grumps

Granny Grumps Report 19 May 2009 19:45

I wanna a second home and lots of money..................can't wait till ours knock on door and asks for votes.....................flea in ear and kick up ass comes to mind.


Helen.

McB

McB Report 19 May 2009 19:39

Here's mine.

Constituency: Aylesbury
MP: Lidington, Mr David
Party: CON
Expenses
Second Home: £19,470
London Supplement: £0
Office: £11,239
Staffing: £70,833
Stationery: £627
IT Provision: £1,283
Staff Cover: £0
Communication: £5,090
Travel: £4,659

Total Expenses: £115,891