Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Gannaway/Plummer look-ups please.
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 10 Jan 2008 10:36 |
i know this is a big ask but i am totally baffled with it all. |
|||
|
Gwyn in Kent | Report | 10 Jan 2008 10:57 |
Do you know for certain that Charles was the son of Henry and Mary Ann? |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 10 Jan 2008 11:02 |
i have his birth certificate son on Henry Gannaway and Mary Ann formaly Bishop. he was born Southampton 1850. i'm convinced i have the right certificate. thanks for looking anyway. just thought i would try my luck i have emily and the children in 91 in Hackney but there is no Charles with them. he never seemed to be around at census time. thanks for looking though.x |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 10 Jan 2008 11:29 |
i'm not sure. where's pennigton? perhaps if it's anywhere near southampton it could be. that's the one gwyn found. i suppose if it's the only one about the right age it's possible. although she is an awful lot older than him- isn't that a rather large age gap? |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 10 Jan 2008 11:43 |
ok well thank you michael, i didn't realise it was that close to southampton. i found afew marriages for charles in southampton just thought i had better check before i ordered. i have looked for a death for amelia on freebmd and can't find one before 1885 when he re-married which is why i had counted them out. thanks for looking. |
|||
|
juma | Report | 10 Jan 2008 11:43 |
Charles Gannaway marriage to Amelia Gross 1872 3rd qtr Southampton ref 2c 76a |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 10 Jan 2008 11:47 |
but if i have the marriage for charles and emily in london in 1885 surely that can't be him. i must have it wrong somewhere. surely it can't be the same person. i know sydney's date of birth and his cert with mother as emily. oh dear this is not my day. thank you. :) |
|||
|
juma | Report | 10 Jan 2008 12:14 |
On the 1871 census he shows Amelia as spouse although they didn't get wed until the following year. Did he marry Emily Constance Plummer when he still had a wife in Lymington just saying he was a widower? |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 10 Jan 2008 12:16 |
Hi - I've just been tracing the family right back from the 1851 onwards and I agree with all those above. |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 10 Jan 2008 12:24 |
thanks to you all for looking. i didn't thinkm of the possibility he married bigamously. i'd always thought that henry worked on the ships which is why he wasn't around census time but i quite agree a name change and bigamous marriage would certainly make sense. |
|||
|
juma | Report | 10 Jan 2008 12:34 |
On the 1871 census he shows Amelia as spouse although they didn't get wed until the following year. Did he marry Emily Constance Plummer when he still had a wife in Lymington just saying he was a widower? |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 10 Jan 2008 12:44 |
ooh thank you. although i have not come across a mary gannaway before. perhaps a third wife. haha. also not heard of any Burtons. thank you so much for finding them. perhaps beatrice was mispelled. afterall gannaway not that common and spoken could be taken as any number of spellings. seems strange that they were all split up. if Vi is at an aunt and uncle's seems odd they didn't take at least beatrice and/ or henry too. thanks again, i really appreciate it. |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 10 Jan 2008 12:49 |
This is the only Violet I could find: |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 10 Jan 2008 12:55 |
although Beatrice should be Beatrice L and aged 11. it is possible but i can't find the link as to how he was her uncle. sorry what was Beatrice's relation to head? |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 10 Jan 2008 12:59 |
Oh, maybe it was just coincidence, Leanne. Just checked the actual page and it says she was a "servant". |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 10 Jan 2008 13:00 |
on the other hand it does seem a little odd that she be a smith. if emma e smith is 60 it's hardly likely that Beatrice be her daughter and there are no other smiths there. sorry could you possibly send me the image so i could have a quick look please? |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 10 Jan 2008 13:02 |
ok. well it was a good thought atleast. thank you.i know i am being a complete pain but could you perhaps look to see if you could find emily plummer on any of the census with family so i could maybe try to figure out where the burton's come in as uncle/aunt? please? |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 10 Jan 2008 13:03 |
The link to the Burtons could be that his wife, Louisa, was a sister to their mother Emily. You would need to research that line of the family to see if you find a Louisa Plummer. |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 10 Jan 2008 13:06 |
o i know tell me about it. this hobby sure does get confusing. i'm searching for marriages of frank burtons ah well we'll see. thanks for all of your help! it really is appreciated. |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 10 Jan 2008 13:11 |
Leanne - here is your link to the Burtons - have found Emily had a sister named Louisa: |