Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
help please? (some scottish!)
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
imp | Report | 25 Dec 2007 00:40 |
Hi Laura |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 24 Dec 2007 14:30 |
According to the header, column 4 of an 1878 Scotish birth registry entry is supposed to contain: |
|||
|
Laura | Report | 23 Dec 2007 21:29 |
Just wanted to say an extra big thank you to all those who helped me on this late last night ! I was chatting to my gran today about it, and my mum (it's her dad's side of the family) and they were both thrilled. |
|||
|
Laura | Report | 23 Dec 2007 00:03 |
oooh, that looks promising too! |
|||
|
imp | Report | 22 Dec 2007 23:49 |
IGI has this but may not be relevant |
|||
|
imp | Report | 22 Dec 2007 23:45 |
Ah yes, all looks good, doesn't it. |
|||
|
Laura | Report | 22 Dec 2007 23:42 |
And I've found a marriage - |
|||
|
Laura | Report | 22 Dec 2007 23:38 |
interestingly, 1851 census has this |
|||
|
imp | Report | 22 Dec 2007 23:36 |
Hi Laura |
|||
|
Laura | Report | 22 Dec 2007 23:30 |
Gail - maybe that's them but the person doing the census thought it was Penryn for the birth because that's where they lived? |
|||
|
Laura | Report | 22 Dec 2007 23:27 |
have a possible match for 1841, in Kenwyn which is near Truro... will buy the marriage certificate just after Xmas I think, that will give me the fathers names etc. |
|||
|
imp | Report | 22 Dec 2007 23:26 |
Yes I think it is Framer |
|||
|
imp | Report | 22 Dec 2007 23:17 |
Hi Laura, |
|||
|
Laura | Report | 22 Dec 2007 23:16 |
all looks very promising - thanks so much for all your help! |
|||
|
♥Betty Boo from Dundee♥ | Report | 22 Dec 2007 23:13 |
What about this from Family Search!! |
|||
|
Laura | Report | 22 Dec 2007 23:13 |
That one for 1861 is definitely likely as the daughter Mary Ann lived in Plymouth and married a Plymothian... |
|||
|
imp | Report | 22 Dec 2007 23:12 |
Think this John on the census is a Seaman, the same Mary Ann Solomon from the 1861 census is with a John on the 1891 and he is a Seaman.....maybe he did not get home very often................... |
|||
|
Laura | Report | 22 Dec 2007 23:10 |
Could it be a mistranscription/mistake with the James/John do you think? |
|||
|
°o.OOº°‘¨Claire in Wales¨‘°ºOO.o° | Report | 22 Dec 2007 23:09 |
Laura I have one that had been married for 27 years & 4 months when their youngest child (my Nan) was born so it is possible. |
|||
|
imp | Report | 22 Dec 2007 23:05 |
1861 census |